![]() |
|
|
November 5, 2008 at 01:02:28
Promoted to Headline (H2) on 11/5/08: by Rob Kall Page 1 of 1 page(s) |
|
|
I couldn't believe how many people told me I wasn't the only one waking up in the middle of the night last night, unable to sleep.
It's not that big a stretch to speculate that all over the world, billions of people who were walking on eggshells worrying about the outcome of the election are now celebrating. Billions!
While America faces tough times economically, the world will embrace us, with billions of people with tears in their eyes, for bestowing upon a black man one of the greatest honors humanity can bestow upon a person – leadership of the most powerful nation.
America has become, again, a beacon, a light that illuminates and energizes the hopes of humanity, making what is best in us shine brighter.
Looking at the faces of the people in the crowd, as Barack Obama gives his first speech as president-elect, I see a hope that beams bright, a hope that does not stop at red or blue state borders or the border of the United States. The whole of humanity is sharing in this moment of hope. We had a moment of connection after 9/11. It was thrown away. But we have another chance now.
I get an instant message from a friend in Waziristan. He usually tells me about the latest bombings and US drone missile firings. He's thrilled that Obama has been elected-- believing there is new hope for democracy and an end to the terrorism he lives with every day. A message comes from Australia titled Delirium in Sydney, and one from Riyad Saudi Arabia, saying "God Bless America."
Obama talks about bottom-up solutions to the economy, to democracy. Echoing that vision, he says tonight, "Let us summon a new spirit of patriotism, of responsibility, where we work harder and look after each other . . . In this country we rise and fall as one nation, as one people."
He says, "The new dawn of American leadership is at hand. To all those who have wondered whether America's beacon still burns bright . . ."
And you see the sea of happy faces and know that all around the world, hearts are a little lighter.
A smart man, a man who chose helping the poor instead of becoming a wealthy lawyer, a man who has a vision of bringing people together will soon be leading America. He advises us to put our "hands on the arc of history and bend it once more to the hope for a better day."
David Axelrod related how, when Obama was considering running for president, he was asked what he could do to make a difference as president. Obama replied, "When I take the oath of office, the world will look at us differently and millions of kids will look at themselves differently."
There are hundreds of millions, perhaps billions of people who suddenly can believe that they can do anything . . . anything.
We can't bask in the glow of this victory tonight without appreciating the fact that the White House will again welcome a strong, brilliant, accomplished, powerful woman. This will also change the way hundreds of millions think about themselves. Michelle Obama brings so much to the White House.
And it seems so true, what Obama said, so modestly, yet so accurately, "I will never forget who this victory truly belongs to. It belongs to you."
Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, President of Futurehealth, Inc, more...)
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
|
|
|
|
| 65 comments |
|
Tears of Joy
Tonight after a brief break in the NBC reporting at 11:00 pm EST when I saw the banner proclaiming Barack Obama the 44th President of the United States - I thought, "Oh my God! What are they doing showing that!?" The electoral votes were only posted as 207 just moments before. I expected to hear about another state or two....NOT the 306 votes that came in during that break! I was watching with my 90 year old mother - we both were stunned that such a huge jump in votes came in in those few minutes. We thought the announcement was a mistake! I am jubilant - ecstatic - and so glad to be an American alive at this historic moment in my beloved country's history. The past 7 years have been so demoralizing and outrageous and draining and hopeless. To say outloud, "I feel glad to be alive." because of a political event is amazing to me. I never knew it could take such a thing to feel real joy. My real name means HOPE and I like so say that I always have hope as long as I don't abandon myself. Now I can rejoice in a resurgence of Hope for a better, saner, more fair, democratic America. I also feel an urge to become more active in the future to the point of speaking my ideas and thoughts to the next administration. (This comes somewhat belatedly - I was a teenager with Nixon and Watergate and tuned out until 2004.) I suspect that I may be listened to now. Again, I Hope so. I am wondering this: What more chicanery can the Bush regime enact in their last couple of months? P.S. The little pin I wore today at the polls: WAR...what is it good for? by Hope Hofmann (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 17 comments) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 1:54:30 AM
|
|
Reply: I Cried.
by JC Garrett (40 articles, 65 quicklinks, 7 diaries, 604 comments [10 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:03:28 AM
|
|
Reply: My 90 (almost 91) year old Mother shouted with me, too !
Mom organized the 10th Anniversary Dinner of the UN Association here in LA, and has been a lifelong crusader for social justice. A 16 year survivor of breast cancer, and a 9 survivor of a near fatal traffic wreck ( she's tap dancing again, after being in a wheelchair for all of 2000) she shouted with me, after the first blowback of shock receded at 8 PM our time Tuesday. We had just returned from the Spanish language Mass, where we had prayed intensely. We had gone the night before, too. It was the Vigil Mass of Election Day, but Monday was also the memorial of St. Martin de Porres, the first saint from the Americas of African descent. From Peru, he was born to a white father and black mother, in grinding poverty, but as a lay Dominican rose to a stature of great holiness, and is now considered a key patron of the Americas. When my bus stopped over somewhere in the deep south, I think Savannah, GA, thirteen years ago, I walked up the street from the station and found myself at the doors of the church that bears his name. It seemed the rightest moment ever to honor his memory, Monday, 7PM, the first Mass for Election Day, and when we walked out of Mass the following night, I opined to Ma, "I have a feeling we're going to have some amazing news as soon as we settle in, and turn the TV back on." At the time, I was thinking it would be Keith Olbermann suggesting that the night would go Obama's way, but we hadn't but walked in the door, minutes before 8, when MSNBC cut into someone's mid-sentence to say, simultaneous with their cutting to the visual and sound of the huge crowd at Grant Park, Chicago roaring, "NBC has just announced that Obama has been elected President." As long as I retain my ability to remember, I will never forget the curious sound of the crowd's roar, or that moment, one of the purest and greatest kinds of music, purely people made, I have ever heard. My personal souvenir from the night, having been a last minute invite to Jesse Jackson's Victory Party in SF after the Convention in 1984, was the sight of Jesse face Tuesday night, moments after Florida was called, with Justice starting to come down "like a mighty stream," beginning as the tears from his eyes........! Obama was perhaps the first to note: "You didn't do this for me." And yet, as Nicholas von Hoffman recently tagged him, "Destiny's tot" will nonetheless carry in his corporate briefcase the hopes and fears of billions. What we saw elected was not just a man, but how much more a powerful symbol of hope, in human guise. It is for that Jesse wept, and we with him. I have no illuisions as to what degree his hands are now tied by so many restraints. But we hope that he, and we, can continue the job of "loosing the ties that 'bind'." More power to Obama, or the very best in him. And our very best to him. ~~John Ervin Native Intelligence Agency Director of Natalities by muservin (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 78 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:51:19 PM
|
|
People's Expectations
People in the USA and all over want and demand radical and profound changes and not mere talk. Here is a short list An honest investigation into the massmurder of 9/11 because the false flag fearmongering is at the root of Cheney's permanent agression upon humanity Impeach the bastards : Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld/Rice/Kissinger massmurderers warmmongers who have tarnished America's image so badly Eliminate the Federal Reserve because this mafia organization is the mother of all financial crises and wars ever since 1913 Abolish AIPAC because it is the instrument of a foreign nation manipulating US's government Tax the rich and the wealthy 10% top earners. Free health care for every American from craddle to death Free education for everybody Put an end to Oil addiction. Choose other non-polluting renewable sources of Energy. He will judged upon performance. Talk is cheap. by ramsheyi (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 793 comments [1 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:06:09 AM
|
|
Reply: No great expectations.
A different middle management has been installed. Four years ago I would have been ecstatic if Kerry had been elected and four years before that had Gore been elected. But I know a lot more now than then and my understanding of the 'system' does more than hint at the superficiality of the national election spectacle. Certainly, Obama is more appealing than any McCain-like figure. But will the juggernaut Empire change its course of world domination? I think not. Will Peter Dale Scott's 'deep government' suddenly disappear. Will the elites who implanted and control Obama wither away into dust? You're kidding, right? Underneath the joyous excitement of the Obama victory lies yet the unfortunate reality that there will be, I certainly believe, no grand substantive change. That such a change, the real change that is necessary to restore the Republic and to restore not just a semblance of morality but real fairness and human concern worldwide... and eliminate the Empire's machinations and disease - that change will not occur. Not only because it will not be 'allowed' to occur. But because Obama is, indeed, a part and parcel of the controlling power. Indeed, we shall see what this episode of the future brings. by richard (0 articles, 5 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 1359 comments [400 recommended, 8 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:01:07 AM
|
|
Reply: to not acknowledge that this was a step towards progress...
you have to be very angry,very depressed and possibly self-deluding. Sure there are still problems. But this is a step in the right direction. I'm meeting with senior editors today and am pretty sure we're going to resolve to NOT tolerate the usual drone of complaining. Things are different now. Think about how YOU can help, not just grouse about past weather. And this is not just for you Richard. There will be reasons to criticize, but we have entered a time of hope. Sure, you're right that there are still plenty of bad guys out there. I challenge you change your narrative from angry complaining to coming up with solutions and good ideas, and to find the light. And if you can't find any light, your eyes are squeezed tightly closed. by Rob Kall (953 articles, 4178 quicklinks, 374 diaries, 2087 comments [45 recommended, 3 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:51:14 AM
|
|
Reply: Does this mean
censorship for OEN Rob? by Jack Harrington (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 676 comments [70 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:50:18 AM
|
|
Reply: no
regulation is not sensorship- -it is time to change --we need to focus on positive changes and we cant be draged down by negative people---and lets all thank rob for helping obama, he seen the truth ,posted it and informed us all---thanks rob and all oped brothers and sisters--ya-hoooooo!!!!!!!! by TRADESMAN (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 12 diaries, 335 comments [40 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:53:37 PM
|
|
Reply: Censorship
we've had this conversation before. OEN routinely does what you might call censorship. We call it editing. The constitution provides you with free speech, the right to say what you want. It prevents the GOVERNMENT from abridging those rights. But it doesn't require publishers to allow you to make your statements within their domain, in print or online. I've just written another article about the issue of grouchy old men who are very negative. I've lightened up a bit, but we ARE going to set some rules. I don't want to see the same handful of cranky negativity people posting the same basic angry complaints on article after article. That's called spamming and it is not tolerated. If you want to call that censorship, go ahead. I don't think it is. by Rob Kall (953 articles, 4178 quicklinks, 374 diaries, 2087 comments [45 recommended, 3 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:06:47 AM
|
|
Reply: Rob, how do you square that...
...with what you said in your Naomi Klein interview about requiering malls to allow free speech on their property? If you have a right to edit (& I agree that you do) then don't malls have a right to control what gets said on their premises? by Darren Wolfe (15 articles, 401 quicklinks, 141 diaries, 1031 comments [84 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:48:47 PM
|
|
Reply: Censorship
exists on many levels, not just an issue of government. Churches censor. Corporations censor. Libraries censor, to mention just three. Perhaps that which you see as negative by cranky old men, those cranky old men see as holding someones' feet to the fire. I can appreciate some of what you are trying to do Rob, but there are, and always will be, folks who do not share your vision. Does that make them negative or wrong? Or does that make your restriction of speech just another power trip? I tend to be a very positive person, until I perceive an injustice or wrong. Then I stand up. I have spoken against the Bush administration. I have spoken my perceptions and the reality of the Democratic behavior. Is that negative? Or only my speaking out against the Democrats, because many here also joined the chorus against Bush. Where and how do you draw the line Rob? I have presented many ideas in my comments that were positive, or should be seriously considered. A national referendum, to perhaps restrain Congress from such things as this mess of a bailout. National recall of national level politicians and judges. Constitutional convention. Restoration of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the rule of law. Are these negative issues? Does speaking my mind on them make me negative? Is it negative or wrong to point out the Emperors new clothes? Should we just sweep the egregious negative behavior of Democrats in Congress under the rug? It is obviously your operation here and your call. Just remember that Bush surrounded himself with self serving yes men and look where it got us. Is that what you want for OEN? by Jack Harrington (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 676 comments [70 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:00:58 PM
|
|
Reply: Perhaps challenge us all to practice SELF-censorship
Thought exercise: "Would I take this as an insult? Can I make this point without indulging in a personal slap?" Even in the give-and-take of honest disagreement, a tone of civility would help everyone focus on the point being urged rather than the offensive attitude being displayed. Rob, I hear you. by editnetwork (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 73 comments) on Friday, Nov 7, 2008 at 6:25:35 AM
|
|
Reply: Does this mean . . .
Provide them a separate play pen, where they can hurl (er) stuff at each other out of our sight? A kind of virtual free speech zone? Asking them kindly to kindly desist or decamp? I'd like to be a fly on the wall at that editorial meeting. by editnetwork (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 73 comments) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 6:32:40 AM
|
|
Reply: This is a time to stop the pettiness
President Obama used the word in his acceptance speech. I read it on line and chose not to listen to it via internet, because I am bunking on a couch of a person who doesn't have tv hookup and like the blogger who, for some sadness that is now a curmudgeonly world view of hopelessness and lovelessness, would have dampened any joy I would have expressed in hearing Obama speak, so I read. And when I came to the word pettiness, and his request that we stop it, well, isn't that the bottom line to any kind of grassroots movement? On my very best days in Iowa during the caucusing, rubbing shoulders with all the candidates, and feeling part of the bigger picture, in a respectful and integrity based way, I was humbled when I stood next to Obama that I felt petty in comparison to the spirit of something great in him, a largesse d'esprit, and my feeling was a reality check, a barometer on my own accord, not something he made me feel...but the mastery of self was so predominant in Obama, that I suddenly wondered if I had done enough for my community, for my neighbors, for the school kids. Until these naysayers have stood and talked with Obama, his hand on their shoulder, looking straight into their eyes, not for one second distracted by the crowd, the timeframe, the next person in line...until that happens to you, you don't realise what you are called to. At the Dem headquarters in Van Nuys I bought the button Be the Change...I am sure you have seen it, with Obama and Biden looking serious...we are the ones to step into our trailers parks and make sure the kids have school supplies so that they can move on in life...we are the changers to say hello to neighbors and not use color/age/gender/etc to build imaginary walls....we are the change without pettiness. So Obama is just asking us that, so why wouldn't Rob Kall ask us the same thing in our writings? When I was wearing my black arm band on moratorium day, back when a cruel war was raging, the phrase was; "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem", a devise that has inspired me time and again to step up the plate, make a phone call, and nowadays, send an email (of ideas that may/could/would possibly help/transform/inspire. I don't see that that is censorship in asking us to not be petty. Finally we have a President modeling light, and remember the flame of a candle burns vertically, not horizontally, (looking to the right of left constantly to see who says what). Like Obama, who focused on me when we talked for a minute, there was no right or left, there was only now...what are we doing now....be the light, be the change, be not petty. by karmacounselor (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 7 diaries, 106 comments [7 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:27:26 AM
|
|
Reply: If you actually saw Barack's speech...
and feel this way, give me your address and I'll send along a shovel, so you can bury yourself. If you didn't see it, you owe it to yourself to do so. P.S. I'm glad too, that I can now go a little slower on my Spanish lessons. by Daniel Geery (26 articles, 95 quicklinks, 126 diaries, 912 comments [27 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 9:38:45 AM
|
|
Reply: Much is new.....
Well. YOU're not cynical, are you. You are overlooking the important and monumental groundswell of the internet-ization of the American public. That in itself (in a political venue and countless others) is transformational. In large part, it is responsible for the remarkable galvanizing ability of the Obama campaign. Political shenanigans-as-usual, I believe, will increasingly be a thing of the past. Too many people can poke around; transparency is inevitable; communication is instant and widespread. The controlling cartels that you believe in, and believe to be impregnable, will have to resort of cyber-crime. But we have lots and lots of exceedingly bright, exceedingly cyber-savvy young geeks who can enter all kinds of systems..... ...and will, for the Good, if we can continue to ignite, cherish, and nurture the idealism that shone from so many faces in crowds of thousands, as they celebrated this unlikely victory for Obama, and for hope. I have seen Science Fiction, and it is us. by Wisewoman (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 47 comments [4 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:37:44 PM
|
|
Reply: WET BLANKET
Don't be a "WET BLANKET", Richard! Have you ever heard of "living in the moment"? Come on! Please let this moment last a little longer...before you dampen it. I felt so good after reading Rob's article and you almost brought me down...."ALMOST but not quite plum!" (wink) "Hope definately floats." by O'Terry (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 19 comments) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:42:01 PM
|
|
Reply: Beware of Extremes
Unbridled enthusiasm is the joy of youth, the belief in righteousness, the certainty of success. It is an intoxication to be briefly enjoyed but it has its dangers. Skepticism is a healthy attitude to be encouraged. We should always try to retain some doubt and wait for real evidence. Let us always never succumb to unbridled enthusiasm. Cynicism is skepticism taken to a pathological and absolutely unhealthy extreme. It is an an antithesis of skepticism as much as is unbridled enthusiasm. Cynicism is a certainty of failure and an unwillingness to wait to see the evidence that something good might be in the making. Cynicism is neither enjoyable nor healthy. It is a degenerate outlook to be avoided. by PrMaine (13 articles, 13 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 510 comments [22 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:45:27 PM
|
|
Reply: Good Call....!
"Middle Management" is the perfect place for positioning our ideas about the pResidency. It is very important that people understand that crucial distinction. The office is called "executive" with good reason: a president is merely the executor of his Boss's orders. Until there is a fundamental change in the structure of the way we do things in our expansionist capitalist setup, a president will only be CEO, or perhaps CFO, of USA, Inc. Although Obama may represent a tangier flavor than the dreary individuals who have "occupied" the office before, it's still the same, and we're fooled again: "Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss." (And, Thanks, Roger Daltrey, for such an incisive lyric.) by muservin (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 78 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:36:15 AM
|
|
Reply: "Middle Management" is always "right" ~~
You nail it when you use the "framing device" of "middle management." That's why they call it "The Executive Branch." The President is merely executor of the Powers that Be. It would be great to find out who these people are. They know who they are, and so must we. by muservin (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 78 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:45:33 AM
|
|
We wanted to retire in Europe
because of Bush. But NOW WE ARE STAYING!! UP THEIRS! by Mark Sashine (72 articles, 19 quicklinks, 269 diaries, 4101 comments [131 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:42:26 AM
|
|
Reply: Welcome back, Mark
:-) We were thinking the same thing. Now we're staying for the rebuilding efforts. Lots of hands are needed. by Kathlyn Stone (46 articles, 227 quicklinks, 27 diaries, 690 comments [1 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:47:33 AM
|
|
Reply: Ditto, but Canada.
There is light. There is hope. Frankly, I want to some respite from the negativity-heads. Let's see what happens. It's time to envision what CAN be. We can react if things don't go as we like. As far as AIPAC, I wish there was a poll that somehow looked at Jews who voted FOR Obama and how they feel about AIPAC. 78% of Jews voted FOR Obama-- the strongest demographic, after blacks. But I'd bet the ones who voted against Obama were the majority of the AIPAC supporters. That doesn't mean the Jews who voted for Obama don't suppot Israel. I'd guess that 98% of them DO. But they don't support the warlike extremism AIPAC supports. by Rob Kall (953 articles, 4178 quicklinks, 374 diaries, 2087 comments [45 recommended, 3 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:44:53 AM
|
|
Reply: The Russian - Jewish
diaspora was vehemently pro- Bush and Pro-McCain. But the US Jews as you have mentioned are 78% pro- Obama. What that means is very interesting- the US Jews are more pro- American than pro- Israel. The US Jews, 78% of them are true American patriots. I had lost all my friends in the Russian-Jewish world through these 8 years but as I said- those are not Jews but Juwes. The real Jews are American patriots. They respect other countries, Israel too but they are not the Zionsit property. Never will. by Mark Sashine (72 articles, 19 quicklinks, 269 diaries, 4101 comments [131 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 9:11:03 AM
|
|
Reply: Russian-Jewish politics
I wouldn't necessarily characterize Russian-Jews as less Jewish than their American counterparts. They tend to identify primarily as "Jewish" (over "American" and "Russian"), even though their Jewishness is manifested culturally rather than religiously. This community is also very invested in Israel, no less so than American Jews. But I wouldn't read it's overwhelming tendency to vote Republican as having anything to do with Israel or with Jewishness. Coming from a communist state, this community is ultra-sensitive to any policy or any person that even resembles socialism. This fear and resentment of socialism or, as they might label it, justified concern, is the foundation of their political conservatism. Democrat-Republican differences regarding Israel barely, if at all, enter the picture. This is all my own subjective opinion (we don't have polling data on this), but it's based on intimate knowledge of my own and my wife's extended family, as well as years of professional research with this community. by Mikhail Lyubansky (15 articles, 11 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 184 comments [7 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:20:09 AM
|
|
Reply: Dear Mikhail
We differ here but it is a very long conversation. My experience as a first- generation one ( my son is now 25) you read in my essay Russian Deliberate Bushlove and is in one statement- they pretend. I am so sorry, Mikhail but the country they left was neither communist nor socialist and also I have to say absolutely that most of us did not really have hard life there, compared to say, people in Sri-Lanka and even with the MAJORITY of the Russian citizens. Yes, there were personal problems and yes, there was a state- supported antisemitism but it had a lot to do with the state-corporate structure of power and not with socialism. In fact , the remnants of socialsim was what was good- education, universal healtcare, possibility to survive at hard times - and there was a plenty. No, Mike, the people en masse emigrated because of personal circumstances, sometimes due to catastrophes or horrible extremes that surely happened, sometimes on the basis of the dream for something better. Now, here they ADOPTED a posture of 'specialists' in the misfortunes of socialism. Partially it is also due to the simple fact that they never saw other worlds, never could really compare and as such consider their misfortunes as something special. I am one of them, I do not separate and I went through all of that. It took me a lot of time to stop feeling inferior and angry and appreciate all the goodness in me which came from that part of my life, the one I left behind. As such I have a right and I unequivocally state that vehemency and berserk noise of the Russian -Jewish media is a PRETENSE, Hypocricy, deliberate instigation of madness and have only one explanation- Cowardice and Intention to appease their Zionist masters in many cases, thus irrational and totally unpatriotic. I also state the whoever God wants to destroy He takes his mind away. When people who had been oppressed by the state insist on oppressing others, when they howl about Obama being ' an end of the world' they are either hypocrites or sick and need help. Sorry for being so blunt and as I said, it is a very long and separate conversation. by Mark Sashine (72 articles, 19 quicklinks, 269 diaries, 4101 comments [131 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:14:29 PM
|
|
Reply: Mark, I hope we get to have that conversation one day.
In the meantime, any thoughts about how to start addressing the deep-seated racism in our community? I would write editorials but my writing in Russian is not up to par and I'm not sure that any of the papers would even print them. by Mikhail Lyubansky (15 articles, 11 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 184 comments [7 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:44:03 PM
|
|
YOU'LL GET EXACTLY WHAT YOU VOTED FOR DON'T EXPECT "TRUTH"
Let’s be generous and give Obama the whole four years of his initial term to make significant progress on the following issues. Here are some questions about “change” that we are going to be keeping track of until 2012. - Will Obama repeal Patriot Acts I and II as well as reversing Bush’s signing statement and acknowledging the repeal of the John Warner Defense Authorization Act? - Will Obama support Dennis Kucinich’s efforts to bring war crimes charges against Bush, Cheney and others for deceiving the country into a war or will he protect them against such charges like Nancy Pelosi has done? - Will Obama bring war crimes charges against Bush, Cheney and others for authorizing torture and will the torture of suspects under U.S. detention, a complete violation of both the Constitution and the Geneva Conventions, cease under an Obama administration? - Will Obama withdraw American troops from Iraq and Afghanistan without sending them away again to bomb another broken-backed third world country in the name of a UN-supported “humanitarian” war? - Will Obama end the warrantless secret surveillance and phone-taps of American citizens? - Will Obama follow through on his rhetorical support for the second amendment or will he seek to ban guns as he did in Illinois? - Will Obama cease his support for the Bush-administration backed banker bailouts, hated by the majority of Americans, and target the real cause of the problem - the Federal Reserve - or will he continue to give taxpayers’ money to banks who are merely hoarding it all for themselves? - Will Obama seek to continue the militarization of America and preparations for martial law through Northcom and the secret government or will he dismantle the police state that has been constructed over the last eight years by the Bush administration? There can be no excuses - either Obama will be proven to be a liar or he will, backed by Democratic control of Congress and the Senate, follow through on his mandate for “change”. Those caught up in Obama fever who would have otherwise voted for Ron Paul should heed the warnings of Dr. No. As the coming of the new messiah drew closer, Paul had some sobering reminders for a CNN audience last night, pointing out that Obama will not cut spending, government will get bigger and more intrusive, foreign policy will remain the same and unpopular financial bailouts will continue. We hope we are wrong, but forgive us for our cynicism, because whatever has emerged from the two-party monopoly in the past has always proven to be the problem - not the solution. DON'T BLAME ME I VOTED FOR MC KINNEY!! by tiffane (4 articles, 2 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 47 comments [1 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:29:41 AM
|
|
Reply: I Hope, and Yes, I Pray, to "All Gods," Including
... including "The Big Bang," I do so Hope and Pray, i.e. "Keep Hope Alive," as Reverend Jackson also did put it, words much akin to This-Here, "Half Irish-Descended," GOOD Lad, named(forgve the Celtic "surname," herein!) "Barack, HUSSEIN, O'BAMA," ... whom, like his beloved Wife, and a TRULY, Good-HGearted First Lady, of Now, finally, again, a TRULY ELECTED(*still we must count every last vote Rob,in Missouri, etcetera, where by any honest VOTE COUNT, OBama won the Show-me State, ... and any honest vote count, nationally must grant barack Obama at least 60% of the People's VoteS(*"The People are coming, Randi," as Maxine Waters told Randi Rhodes, during those darkest days, just after Stolen "election" II, in November, 2004!) have to be HONESTLY tabulated for Obama, or the Republicans$' Massive VOTER SUPPRESSION and Attempted "Election's" THEFT that Greg Palast and Brad Friedman speak of, hath happened, again, Rob, as in 2000, '02, 2004 AND in *2006, as well! This Op-Ed-er makes some great and TRUE points, ... yet too, Libertarian "thinkers$" like Ron PAUL, and Milton Friedman, Ayn Rand, and Alan Greenspan, have long infuenced[going BACK to at least the mid 1970's and probably long BEFORE!) thes$e RIGHTIS$T, often LIBERTICIDAL "Pro-Libertarians$" Bastards$, like Ron Reagan, from at leas$t January, 1981 A.D., and all the CRAPOLA that this country, formerly known as "America," hath had HEAPED upon the People's$ Unwilling throats$, like some cruel YOKE upon some poor TORTURED, and OLD, Farm Animal's Head and Neck, whom s$uch DEREGULATED, unfettered, Murderous CRUELTY that Ron PAUL would allow the "American" Oil Companies$ in Alaska, and EVERYWHERE, is$ JUST what made S$ARAH PALIN Support Ron PAUL, earlier on in this whole MAD, and LIES$-addicted, "Election" process! Still will try to keep positive about Barack and Michele Obama, two truly DESERVINGLY Elected, Leaders, of hopefully, the newly "Reborn Again, AMERICA," and that kind of SECULAR American PEOPLE's(of ALL Faiths, including devout and indeed, PEACEFUL, MUSLIM, People, Our fellow CITIZENS, Our fellow, ... Humanity!) "Re-Birth" is something that will NEVER require S$arah' palin's$ False "GODS$," nor, honestly, Ron Paul's for that greedily-cynical matter, and why hath NOT your "Cons$titutionalis$t" "Hero" Ron Paul hath never signed on as co-sponser to any of Rep. Denny KUCINICH's highly PATRIOTIC, 35 Articles of the needed IMPEACHMENT Process? Is "Cons$titutionalist," Mr. Paul simply being his usual, HYPOCRITICALLY-CRUEL "thinking" $Self, or is HE too, simply afraid of the NAPOLEONIC, "Inbred Blue Blood" in his, KING GW's$ Completely NON-Elected, PEOPLE'S$ "White Hous$e"!? Ban me if yee wish, for such remarks, Dr. Robby MacKall, me-lad. For I shan't be surprised, if you did so. I long ago wroted that we should NEVER treat Obama as our "new God or Jesus," etcetera, that WE THE PEOPLE, have to get this country back from the S$till-powerful Republican-Led Fas$cists$, and their NEO CON-Artists$, DLC Phony "Democrats$," ... and "Free Markets$" Uber Alles$[!], espousing Liberticidal "Libertarians$"[*hence we NOW have over $518 TRILLION Dollars$ in thesetotally Unregulated Deriviatives$ and "Securities$" that the-then "Libertarian-Minded" GW Bus$H, forbade the S.E.C., from regulating, at ALL, G-damned it, for 7-8 years$!] close KIN, in the languages of HATRED, but NOT of truly, truth-seeking, critical Thought, ... will still be very powerful, and criminally S$o, in this incoming Obama Administration; how much will Obama COLLABORATE with them all, is my real question, for I do not believe this barack Lad to be a true "recrudescence" of FDR, or Even JFK, and I shall pray for each and every day, in his, hopefull 8 years in Office that HE, Obama shall not Die in Office, from Illness, as did, God protect HIM, FDR, nor BLOODILY, Murderously, from some Coward{s$] shooting from Behing the GRASSY KNOLL, on THAT "November 22nd," of 1963 A.D., the first day that I ever saw my beloved, TOUGH, Boston Irish Street "Kid," and World War Two, HERO Father, ever CRY, openly. Best Barks, nonetheless, to "the RIDENT One, named Rob," and to all a good MORNING of True Re-Birth, particularly if yee be my Beloved, Fellow, Tolerant, and always-THINKING, American Citizenry, from Brian and Casper O'Moore! by Brian O'Moore (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 49 comments [2 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:00:05 PM
|
|
Reply: Good Article Tiffanie
We all wanted Change from these past eight years of Bush. The Obama Presidency like others have noted, will bring only cosmetic differences. Obama received four times the amount of money from the militeary-industrial complex as McCain. They are both total One World Order. Look for spreading wars, more loss of personal freedoms, a new currency, and a million man homeland security force to spy on and keep the population from total rebellion. The changes that are coming down the pike may have us saying the Bush years were the good old days. Hope I'm wrong! by ronheri (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 257 comments [45 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:43:36 AM
|
|
Reply: Pendulums...
tiffane: Thanks for the reminder. The euphoria for a change from the path the US was on is great, but let's see if anything REALLY changes. And doesn't just substitute a leftist autocracy for a rightist one. by kibitzer2 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 49 comments) on Saturday, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:11:20 PM
|
|
To me
the celebration is premature. He has not begun naming his Cabinet, has not proposed any actual laws or changes in the law to present Congress, in fact he has not even been inaugurated, and several Senate and House seats are still undecided. I am glad you have hope. I just see the record of the Democrats in opposition and have to wonder just how many spots the leopard will change while in power. We will see, but I for one am not holding my breath. by Jack Harrington (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 676 comments [70 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:48:55 AM
|
|
Exhale...
then breathe slowly, it ain't gonna be easy my friend. The world awaits and expects big things which will not happen quickly if ever. Being on the pricipiece of a deep world-wide recession, possibly even depression does not give Obama much wiggle room, no matter how smart he is. He will have to be a real uniter and bring the smartest, most innovative minds to the table to have much chance of doing anything close to what folks will expect of him. His vision for unity is good and he sounds wonderful, but only time will tell. If he fails, racism will likely rear it's ugly head beyond what either of us can imagine. But it is a time for celebration and prayers for a brighter future. poeticsense by Patrick Michael (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:51:51 AM
|
|
Reply: Amen
Amen to that, brother. by Jay Farrington (13 articles, 2 quicklinks, 12 diaries, 236 comments) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:58:46 AM
|
|
Hallelujah!
We're taking our country BACK!!! Praise GOD! by Zena Princess (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 89 comments) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:05:45 PM
|
|
Rahm Emanuel for Chief of Staff?
Proffering Rahm Emanuel as Chief of Staff is not a very promising sign of Light. It is an potentially ill omen for the Middle East and puts an AIPAC man in a strategic position to work their agenda. My warm fuzzy feeling after Obama's speech last night is fading fast. If Obama also, like Bush, tethers himself to extreme Right-wing Israeli interests, then he might as well sow dragon seeds right now and just watch them grow into specters of death and war. If Obama does not become a neutral player and facilitator in the Middle East and work with all sides, then he will be walking the opposite path from Light. He too will be plunging into darkness. This is a moment in history when we really, really need a leader who will embrace what the Buddha has taught: Hatred can never vanquish hatred. Only love can vanguish hatred. If Obama gets this core truth wrong, kiss off any hope of transforming the world into something better. by Mac McKinney (53 articles, 114 quicklinks, 241 diaries, 1414 comments [31 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:07:17 PM
|
|
Reply: Do you know what a Chief of Staff DOES?
He isnt a policy guy. He is an enforcer of the President's policies and makes sure the cabinet is focused on them. He also makes sure no one does anything that hurts the prestige of the President. by Steven Leser (255 articles, 58 quicklinks, 38 diaries, 2147 comments [63 recommended, 2 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:15:59 PM
|
|
Jump start to real thinking.
For most people this election has opened new vistas of possibility, and recalled many old vistas that seemed foreclosed by the government of the last eight years. All of us have new hopes, though we don't all share the same vision. A few of us are skeptical, not wishing to have hopes dashed. For those of us that write, the challenge is to model clear thinking, and to persuade rather than rant. We must give shape to the new possibilities with our words and logic, and document what needs to be changed in ways that create unity of purpose. Surely the campaign that just ended demonstrates how much more productive hopeful people are, and how destructive and cruel fearful people can be. We voted for hope and optimism. Now let's live it and write about it with insight, talent and passion. by Richmond Shreve (30 articles, 70 quicklinks, 17 diaries, 157 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:25:49 PM
|
|
Hope
Rob, I liked the way you described the feeling of America's Victory last night. How could anyone who saw the hope in the faces of people all over the world on the TV screen, not realize the impact of what took place. Sure Obama will make some mistakes, and there will be those who will never give him credit when he is right. It will take us all pulling together, and sometimes pulling those who would rather stay behind forward with us. It won't be easy. In addition, there are still so many things that could happen between now and January 20th. This administration, I am afraid, will not go away without at least one more try at destoying our country. But on this Historic day, we need to look ahead at the possibilities that have been given to us. We should not let the people who choose to be negative detract from the hope that we feel. I believe this feeling of hope is possibly the same hope our Founding Fathers felt when they were at last free from the chains that bound them. God has blessed America. May he contiue to do so is my prayer. by Fish Farmer (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:39:22 PM
|
|
Obixon
I hate to rain on this parade, but all that's happened is that another sleazy politician has fooled people into voting for him. Even if he were a good man, & I don't think he is, he'd have a hard time fixing the mess were in. But since he's just another empire builder he'll bungle everything. Read about it at Obixon. Then join us at: by Darren Wolfe (15 articles, 401 quicklinks, 141 diaries, 1031 comments [84 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:57:45 PM
|
|
Reply: I think you should be convicted of murder
What, you haven't done anything yet? Well, Obama hasnt taken office yet either. Convicting him, which is what an impeachment is, goes against anything in which any American should believe. by Steven Leser (255 articles, 58 quicklinks, 38 diaries, 2147 comments [63 recommended, 2 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:55:08 PM
|
|
Reply: Yeah, yeah
At this point Impeach Obama Now! is tongue in cheek. In a few years it will be looked at as prophetic. by Darren Wolfe (15 articles, 401 quicklinks, 141 diaries, 1031 comments [84 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:43:59 PM
|
|
Reply: Hello Troll
Darren Wolfe, Nice catching you red-handed on this spot. Where have been? We missed so much your nonsense and trash. Let's scrutinize your absurdity posted here. I don't need your garbage of an answer, my questions are irrefutable facts. 'Sleazy politician...who fooled people' I would reserve this for Bush. Didn't he steal two elections shamelessly, first through court appointment, the second time through rigging voting machines? 'Epire Builder' would aptly apply to someone who wages wars of agression on foreign nations and builds military bases and steals the oil for the benefit of his cronies. Sounds like Bush, no? 'the mess you are in' was something deliberately set up by Bush's buddy Mr Ben Bernake of the Federal Reserve. It was intentional meant to ruin the populace by stealing their tax money and giving it to the rich. Fixing the mess requires removing the entire cohort of gangsters grouped around a chief bandit called George Bush. Let us hope Obama will honor his oath and will impeach and tar and feather these criminals that you are paid to defend here. By the way, aren't you the nasty guy who was sent here to smear Noble Prize winner Krugman? You ought to be the fellow sent here to throw dirt at the honest politician Chavez, Right? I recognize you. Trolls stink, and you smell troll sh*t. by ramsheyi (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 793 comments [1 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:04:36 PM
|
|
Reply: NUTS!!
You're NUTS! Get back in your cage! by O'Terry (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 19 comments) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:13:17 PM
|
|
Great analogy Rob
I am overwhelmed and elated with great joy, not only for myself but for all of us everywhere on earth. The shroud of darkness has finally been lifted and a bright beacon of hope is shining brightly in its place! by Michael Shaw (12 articles, 1 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 439 comments [16 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:54:31 PM
|
|
A Time of Meaning
Last night was the vindication of those who have worked for hope and for change. Last night was the door opening, an invitation for us all to walk together into the future in unity. It is not going to be a smooth or easy journey. Each of us is going to have to resolve to work hard, fight if necessary against those who would thwart beneficial progress; and NEVER forget that YES WE CAN DO IT. I have lived through 72 yrs., around the world and here at home in America; the first hand education through interaction with other peoples who have differing spriritual, ethnic paths, has always left me open to listen first with an open mind before making decisions. The journey has been often frustrating, especially over the past 8 yrs., BUT I have never lost faith in the common goodness of people. Last night my faith was made manifest. Remember, nothing ventured, nothing gained. Each of us must now venture to usher in the changes this country needs so bady. Each of us must now support a man who has called to each of us to be better to ourselves, our neighbors -- here and abroad, and to ensure that the coming generations will live in a safer, more prosperous world. A world where dreams can be fulfilled if we are willing to work to make them so. by Wazi (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 6 comments) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:24:42 PM
|
|
Great Ariticle!
What a great article, Rob! ...and Amen!!! by O'Terry (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 19 comments) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:44:14 PM
|
|
Ah, the problem of 'self delusion'.... by whom?
Rob wrote: “to not acknowledge that this was a step towards progress... you have to be very angry,very depressed and possibly self-deluding. [rob, are you sure you wish to engage psychiatric diagnosis based upon my views regarding Obama. Not only is that unprofessional, but it is also inaccurate. Go back to school.] “Sure there are still problems. But this is a step in the right direction. I'm meeting with senior editors today and am pretty sure we're going to resolve to NOT tolerate the usual drone of complaining. Things are different now. Think about how YOU can help, not just grouse about past weather. And this is not just for you Richard.” [I find it very revealing that you that you would consider censoring comments (that are not violating any aspect of polite discourse) with which you simply disagree. This position you appear to endorse is, perhaps, the most disappointing view I have ever heard from you. Silence criticism of Obama. Silence any questioning of the basis of your ‘hope’. And silence any real criticism of Obama based upon reasonable review of what he has done, what he has said, and based upon what we actually know about the two parties, the ‘deep government’, the CIA and their purposes within the context of global financial and military power.] “There will be reasons to criticize, but we have entered a time of hope. Sure, you're right that there are still plenty of bad guys out there. I challenge you change your narrative from angry complaining to coming up with solutions and good ideas, and to find the light. And if you can't find any light, your eyes are squeezed tightly closed.” [Rob, you’re sounding more like an authoritarian pollyanna here. Just what, exactly, is the light you are referring to here? The 'light' that has apparently blinded you? You appear to be thoroughly caught up within the official memes that we are a ‘democracy’, that the two parties represent anything other than the two faces of the folks who own you. And frankly, the available evidence runs counter to the face of your ‘hope’. I have ‘hopes’ like any other person. But I am also an empiricist and realist. You appear willing to wallow in the ‘hopeful’ illusion. And should you implement a draconian censure of of views at odds with your own, an unfortunate truth would be revealed. I sincerely hope you do not stoop to that level of paranoid control. But should you, I would certainly voluntarily promise to never post on and visit OpEdnews again. (i.e., you wouldn’t have to ban me).] by richard (0 articles, 5 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 1359 comments [400 recommended, 8 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:56:39 PM
|
|
I feel like I've left the trench.
I feel like I've left the trench and now I'm in no man's land. As usual, when it comes to the Democrats, I am expecting another betrayal. I'll come around when I see some Republicans arrested and tried. by John Hanks (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1762 comments [39 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:04:07 PM
|
|
while we're being positive...
....how about a few words of praise for McCain's concession speech? I thought it was very gracious, much more than I would have expected given some of the earlier name-calling. Not only did he not blame anyone except himself, he also offered his assistance in working for the good of the country that both himself and Obama served. I'm not a Republican nor an American but I know that lasting change won't come about without finding common ground between 'red' and 'blue'. by lwarman (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 98 comments [7 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:43:45 PM
|
|
a reconsideration...
Perhaps you need to get a clue. Before you diagnose somebody as 'delusional'...... Do you really think my cynicism is misplaced...? Ah... I thought not. CAN WE TALK ABOUT THE REAL OBAMA NOW? Sam Smith Over the past few weeks I've been a good boy. I've placed everything having to do with the real Barack Obama into a futures file and spent my time on the far grimmer matter of the real John McCain and Sarah Palin. Now the party is over and it's time for people to put away their Barack and Michelle dolls and start dealing with what has truly happened. This, I admit, is difficult because the real Obama doesn't exist yet. He follows in the footsteps of our first postmodern president, Bill Clinton, who observed the principles outlined by scholar Pauline Marie Rosenau: Post-modernists recognize an infinite number of interpretations . . . of any text are possible because, for the skeptical post-modernists, one can never say what one intends with language, [thus] ultimately all textual meaning, all interpretation is undecipherable.. . . Many diverse meanings are possible for any symbol, gesture, word . . . Language has no direct relationship to the real world; it is, rather, only symbolic. As James Krichick wrote in the New Republic, "Obama is, in his own words, something of a Rorschach test. In his latest book, The Audacity of Hope, he writes, 'I am new enough on the national political scene that I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.' " This is remarkably similar to Ted Koppel's description of Vanna White of TV's Wheel of Fortune: "Vanna leaves an intellectual vacuum, which can be filled by whatever the predisposition of the viewer happens to be." Obama has left the same kind of vacuum. His magic, or con, was that voters could imagine whatever they wanted and he would do nothing to spoil their reverie. He was a handsome actor playing the part of the first black president-to-be and, as in films, he was careful not to muck up the role with real facts or issues that might harm the fantasy. Hence the enormous emphasis on meaningless phrases like hope and change. Of course, in Obama's postmodern society -- one that rises above the purported false teachings of partisanship -- we find ourselves with little to steer us save the opinions of whatever non-ideologue happens to be in power. In this case, we may really only have progressed from the ideology of the many to the ideology of the one or, some might say, from democracy to authoritarianism. The Obama campaign was driven in no small part by a younger generation trained to accept brands as a substitute for policies. If the 1960s had happened like this, the activists would have spent all their time trying to get Martin Luther King or Joan Baez elected president rather than pursing ancillary issues like ending segregation and the war in Vietnam. Obama himself took his vaunted experience in community organizing and turned its principles on its head. Instead of empowering the many at the bottom, he used the techniques to empower one at the top: himself. It is historic that a black has been elected president, but we should remember that Obama was not running against Bull Connor, George Wallace or Strom Thurmond. Putting Obama in the same class as earlier black activists discredits the honor of those who died, suffered physical harm or were repeatedly jailed to achieve equality. Obama is not a catalyst of change, but rather its belated beneficiary. The delay, to be sure, is striking; after all, the two white elite sports of tennis and golf were integrated long before presidential politics, but Washington - as Phil Hart said of the Senate - has always been a place that always does things twenty years after it should have. There is an informative precedent to Obama's rise. Forty-two years ago Edward Brooke became the first black senator to be elected with a majority of white votes. Brooke was chosen from Massachusetts as a Republican in a state that was 97% white. Jason Sokol, who teaches history at the University of Pennsylvania, wrote in History News Network: |||| On Election Day, Brooke triumphed with nearly 60 percent of the vote. Newspapers and magazines hummed with approval. The Boston Globe invoked a legacy that included the Pilgrims, Daniel Webster, and Charles Sumner, offering the Bay State as the nation's racial and political pioneer. Journalist Carl Rowan was among the unconvinced. For whites, voting for Brooke became "a much easier way to wipe out guilt feelings about race than letting a Negro family into the neighborhood or shaking up a Jim Crow school setup." Polling numbers lent credence to Rowan's unease. They showed that only 23 percent of Massachusetts residents approved of a statewide school integration law; just 17 percent supported open housing. |||| That's the problem with change coming from the top, as Obama might have heard when he was involved in real community organizing. It also helps to explain why there have been no more Catholic presidents since John Kennedy. Symbolism is not the change we need. Getting at the reality of Obama is difficult. He performs as the great black liberal, but since he is one half white and one half conservative, that doesn't leave him a lot of wiggle room. To be sure, in the Senate he got good ratings from various liberal groups, but two things need to be remembered: First, liberals aren't that liberal any more. Thus getting a 90% score merely means that you went along with the best that an extremely conservative Democratic Party was willing to risk. This is not a party that would, in these times, have passed Social Security, Medicare or minimum wage. In fact, many liberals aren't much interested in economic issues at all - especially that portion of the constituency that controls the money, the media and the message. Second, politicians reflect their constituency. Obama's constituency is no longer Illinois. He has a whole new set of folks to pander to. There is one story from Chicago, however, that remains relevant. A citizen walks into his alderman's office looking for a job. "Who sent you?" he asks. "Nobody," he replies. Says the staffer: "We don't want nobody nobody sent." Who sent Barack Obama remains a mystery. He has risen from an unknown state senator to president in exactly four years and that only happens when somebody sends for you. The black liberal image falters on a number of other scores including Obama's affection for extreme right wingers like Chuck Hagel and an obvious indifference to anybody who votes like, say, a state senator from Hyde Park. Think back over the campaign and try to recall a single instance when Obama reached out to the progressive wing of the Democratic Party or to the better angels of the Congressional Black Caucus. Instead his ads attacked as 'extreme' the single payer health insurance backed by many of his own supporters, he dissed ACORN and Colin Powell was as radical a black as he wanted to be seen palling around with. The key issue that has driven Obama throughout his career has been Obama. He has achieved virtually nothing for any other cause. His politics reflects whatever elite consensus he gathers around himself. This is why his "post partisanship" needs to be watched so carefully. If Bernie Sanders and John Conyers don't get to White House meetings as often as Chuck Hagel, Obama will glide easily to the right, as every president has done over the past thirty years. If liberals, as they did with Clinton, watch without a murmur as their president redesigns their party to fit his personal ambitions, then the whole country will continue to move to the right as well. Since the real Obama doesn't exist yet, it is impossible to predict with any precision what he will do. But here is some of the evidence gathered over the past months that should serve both as a warning and as a prod to progressives not to take today's dreams as a reasonable facsimile of reality: Business interests Advisor Cass Sunstein told Jeffrey Rosen of the NY Times: "I would be stunned to find an anti-business [Supreme Court] appointee from either [Clinton or Obama]. There's not a strong interest on the part of Obama or Clinton in demonizing business, and you wouldn't expect to see that in their Supreme Court nominees." Obama supported making it harder to file class action suits in state courts. David Sirota in the Nation wrote, "Opposed by most major civil rights and consumer watchdog groups, this big business-backed legislation was sold to the public as a way to stop 'frivolous' lawsuits. But everyone in Washington knew the bill's real objective was to protect corporate abusers." He voted for a business-friendly "tort reform" bill He voted against a 30% interest rate cap on credit cards He had the most number of foreign lobbyist contributors in the primaries He was even more popular with Pentagon contractors than McCain He was most popular of the candidates with K Street lobbyists In 2003, rightwing Democratic Leadership Council named Obama as one of its "100 to Watch." After he was criticized in the black media, Obama disassociated himself with the DLC. But his major economic advisor, Austan Goolsbee, is also chief economist of the conservative organization. Writes Doug Henwood of the Left Business Observer, "Goolsbee has written gushingly about Milton Friedman and denounced the idea of a moratorium on mortgage foreclosures." Added Henwood, "Top hedge fund honcho Paul Tudor Jones threw a fundraiser for him at his Greenwich house last spring, 'The whole of Greenwich is backing Obama,' one source said of the posh headquarters of the hedge fund industry. They like him because they're socially liberal, up to a point, and probably eager for a little less war, and think he's the man to do their work. They're also confident he wouldn't undertake any renovations to the distribution of wealth." Civil liberties He supports the war on drugs He supports the crack-cocaine sentence disparity He supports Real ID He supports the PATRIOT Act He supports the death penalty He opposes lowering the drinking age to 18 He supported amnesty for telecoms engaged in illegal spying on Americans Conservatives He went to Connecticut to support Joe Lieberman in the primary against Ned Lamont Wrote Paul Street in Z Magazine, "Obama has lent his support to the aptly named Hamilton Project, formed by corporate-neo-liberal Citigroup chair Robert Rubin and other Wall Street Democrats to counter populist rebellion against corporatist tendencies within the Democratic Party. . . Obama was recently hailed as a Hamiltonian believer in limited government and free trade by Republican New York Times columnist David Brooks, who praises Obama for having "a mentality formed by globalization, not the SDS." Writes the London Times, "Obama is hoping to appoint cross-party figures to his cabinet such as Chuck Hagel, the Republican senator for Nebraska and an opponent of the Iraq war, and Richard Lugar, leader of the Republicans on the Senate foreign relations committee. Senior advisers confirmed that Hagel, a highly decorated Vietnam war veteran and one of McCain's closest friends in the Senate, was considered an ideal candidate for defense secretary. Richard Lugar was rated 0% by SANE. . . rated 0% by AFL-CIO. . . rated 0% BY NARAL. . . rated 12% by American Public Health Association. . . rated 0% by Alliance for Retired Americans. . . rated 27% by the National Education Association. . . rated 5% by League of Conservation Voters. . . He voted no on implementing the 9/11 Commission report. . . Vote against providing habeas corpus for Gitmo prisoners. . .voted no on comprehensive test ban treaty. . .voted against same sex marriage. . . strongly anti-abortion. . . opposed to more federal funding for healthcare. . .voted for unconstitutional wiretapping. . .voted to increase penalties for drug violations Chuck Hagel was rated 0% by NARAL. . . rated 11% by NAACP. . . rated 0% by Human Rights Coalition. . . rated 100% by Christian Coalition. . . rated 12% by American Public Health Association. . . rated 22% by Alliance for Retired Americans. . . rated 36% by the National Education Association. . . rated 0% by League of Conservation Voters. . . rated 8% by AFL-CIO. . . He is strongly anti-abortion. . .voted for anti-flag desecration amendment. . .voted to increase penalties for drug violations. . . favors privatizing Social Security Ecology Obama voted for a nuclear energy bill that included money for bunker buster bombs and full funding for Yucca Mountain. He supports federally funded ethanol and is unusually close to the ethanol industry. He led his party's reversal of a 25-year ban on off-shore oil drilling Education Obama has promised to double funding for private charter schools, part of a national effort undermining public education. He supports the No Child Left Behind Act albeit expressing reservations about its emphasis on testing. Writes Cory Mattson, "Despite NCLB''s loss of credibility among educators and the deadlock surrounding its attempted reauthorization in 2007, Barack Obama still offers his support. Even the two unions representing teachers, both which for years supported reform of the policy to avoid embarrassing their Democratic Party 'friends,' declared in 2008 that the policy is too fundamentally flawed to be reformed and should be eliminated." Fiscal policy Obama rejected moratoriums on foreclosures and a freeze on rates, measures supported by his primary opponents John Edwards and Hillary Clinton He was a strong supporter of the $700 billion cash-for-trash banker bailout plan. Two of his top advisors are former Goldman Sachs chair Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers. Noted Glen Ford of black Agenda Report, "In February 1999, Rubin and Summers flanked Fed Chief Alan Greenspan on the cover of Time magazine, heralded as, 'The Committee to Save the World.' Summers was then Secretary of the Treasury for Bill Clinton, having succeeded his mentor, Rubin, in that office. Together with Greenspan, the trio had in the previous year labored successfully to safeguard derivatives, the exotic 'ticking time bomb' financial instruments, from federal regulation." Robert Scheer notes that "Rubin, who pocketed tens of millions running Goldman Sachs before becoming treasury secretary, is the man who got President Clinton to back legislation by then-Sen. Phil Gramm, R-Texas, to unleash banking greed on an unprecedented scale." Obama's fund-raising machine has been headed by Penny Prtizker former chair of the Superior Bank, one of the first to get into subprime mortgages. While she resigned as chair of the family business in 1994, as late as 2001 she was still on the board and wrote a letter saying that her family was recapitalizing the bank and pledging to "once again restore Superior's leadership position in subprime lending." The bank shut down two months later and the Pritzker family would pay $460 million in a settlement with the government. Foreign policy Obama endorsed US involvement in the failed drug war in Colombia: "When I am president, we will continue the Andean Counter-Drug Program." He has expressed a willingness to bomb Iran and won't rule out a first strike nuclear attack. He has endorsed bombing or invading Pakistan to go after Al Qaeda in violation of international law. He has called Pakistan "the right battlefield ... in the war on terrorism." He supports Israeli aggression and apartheid. Obama has deserted previous support for two-state solution to Mid East situation and refuses to negotiate with Hamas. He has supported Jerusalem as the capitol of Israel, saying "it must remain undivided." He favors expanding the war in Afghanistan. Although he claims to want to get out of Iraq, his top Iraq advisor wrote that America should keep between 60,000 and 80,000 troops in Iraq. Obama, in his appearances, blurred the difference between combat soldiers and other troops. He indicated to Amy Goodman that he would leave 140,000 private contractors and mercenaries in Iraq because "we don't have the troops to replace them." He has called Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez an enemy of the United States and urged sanctions against him. He claimed "one of the things that I think George H.W. Bush doesn't get enough credit for was his foreign policy team and the way that he helped negotiate the end of the Cold War and prosecuted the Gulf War. That cost us $20 billion dollars. That's all it cost. It was extremely successful. I think there were a lot of very wise people." He has hawkish foreign policy advisors who have been involved in past US misdeeds and failures. These include Zbigniew Brzezinski, Anthony Lake, General Merrill McPeak, and Dennis Ross. It has been reported that he might well retain as secretary of defense Robert Gates who supports actions in violation of international law against countries merely suspected of being unwilling or unable to halt threats by militant groups. Gays Obama opposes gay marriage. He wouldn't have photo taken with San Francisco mayor because he was afraid it would seem that he supported gay marriage Health Obama opposes single payer healthcare or Medicare for all. Military Obama would expand the size of the military. National Service Obama favors a national service plan that appears to be in sync with one being promoted by a new coalition that would make national service mandatory by 2020, and with a bill requiring such mandatory national service introduced by Rep. Charles Rangel. He announced in Colorado Springs last July, "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded." On another occasion he said, "It's also important that a president speaks to military service as an obligation not just of some, but of many. You know, I traveled, obviously, a lot over the last 19 months. And if you go to small towns, throughout the Midwest or the Southwest or the South, every town has tons of young people who are serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. That's not always the case in other parts of the country, in more urban centers. And I think it's important for the president to say, this is an important obligation. If we are going into war, then all of us go, not just some." Some have seen this as a call for reviving the draft. He has attacked the exclusion of ROTC on some college campuses Presidential crimes Obama aggressively opposed impeachment actions against Bush. One of his key advisors, Cass Sunstein of the University of Chicago Law School, said prosecuting government officials risks a "cycle" of criminalizing public service. Progressives Unlike his deferential treatment of right wing conservatives, Obama's treatment of the left has been dismissive to insulting. He dissed Nader for daring to run for president again. And he called the late Paul Wellstone "something of a gadfly" Public Campaign Financing Obama's retreat from public campaign financing has endangered the whole concept. Social welfare Obama wrote that conservatives and Bill Clinton were right to destroy social welfare, Social Security Early in the campaign, Obama said, "everything is on the table" with Social Security. o As things now stand, the election primarily represents the extremist center seizing power back from the extremist right. We have moved from the prospect of disasters to the relative comfort of mere crises. Using the word 'extreme' alongside the term 'center' is no exaggeration. Nearly all major damage to the United States in recent years - a rare exception being 9/11 - has been the result of decisions made not by right or left but by the post partisan middle: Vietnam, Iraq, the assault on constitutional liberties, the huge damage to the environment, and the collapse of the economy - to name a few. Go back further in history and you'll find, for example, the KKK riddled with members of the establishment including - in Colorado - a future governor, senator and mayor after whom Denver's airport is named. The center, to which Obama pays such homage, has always been where most of the trouble lies. The only thing that will make Obama the president pictured in the campaign fantasy is unapologetic, unswerving and unendingly pressure on him in a progressive and moral direction, for he will not go there on his own. But what, say, gave the New Deal its progressive nature was pressure from the left of a sort that simply doesn't exist today. Above are listed nearly three dozen things that Obama supports or opposes with which no good liberal or progressive would agree. Unfortunately, what's out there now, however, looks more like a rock concert crowd or evangelical tent meeting than a determined and directed political constituency. Which isn't so surprising given how successful our system have been at getting people to accept sights, sounds, symbols and semiotics as substitutes for reality. Once again, it looks like we'll have to learn the hard way. by richard (0 articles, 5 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 1359 comments [400 recommended, 8 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 9:15:07 PM
|
|
Reply: a worthy read
Interesting read...thanks for posting it (though a link would have also sufficed). I agree that he does serve as a sort of Rorschach (am working on a piece about this) and that there is much about him we don't know. Indeed, there are many unknowns and it's good (vital!) that we have critical voices. But even if Obama winds up being a Centrist executive, it is still a victory to move away from Republican rule...and many people here just want a few days to enjoy it. by Mikhail Lyubansky (15 articles, 11 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 184 comments [7 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:07:26 AM
|
|
Reply: Richard...
How is it that I could tell that Obama's "honeymoon period" with the far left would be much shorter than his honeymoon with the far right? I was waiting for comments like yours to pepper OEN comment sections from Wednesday morning on. Very predicable. Why don't you wait a few months before you tell us all how awful Obama is as a president? by John R Moffett (89 articles, 18 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 697 comments [14 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:23:37 AM
|
|
Reply: John,
Hate to disillusion you but.. I am not a leftist. Being critical of Obama's actual expressed views on a vast array of issues (as noted in the above article) and utilizing that data to determine that he is not somebody whose views I find acceptable does not make me a 'leftist' .... except possibly in Bizarro world. And I hazard that you don''t have many months..... let's see, you have about until the 21st or 22nd of January ... at least according to Colin Powell. What I find interesting, but not particularly remarkable, is that so many would prefer to live in their illusory, pollyanna world (perhaps because their relief in ridding themselves of BushCo) and neglect, in their 'joy' to even begin to look realistically at the brave new world they've been tossed into. I chastise myself for not having predicted what should have been, to me, the obvious outcome a two years' worth of electoral distraction and emotional manipulation (given my profession). Perhaps I should have taken more courses in sociology or consulted with my Sociology professor nephew. It is remarkable, however, to note how easily vast swaths of the American populace have been so masterfully manipulated. So yeh, John, go back to sleep and wait your many months. by richard (0 articles, 5 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 1359 comments [400 recommended, 8 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 6:00:15 AM
|
|
Still more than 2 months of Bush
We're not out of the woods yet. There is a lot then can happen before Jan. 20. To see military planes on alert around nuclear plants, buzzing around, hasn't occured since 9-11 in such ferocity. There was real fear. There still is a real concern. How many really bad people have been profiting from killing and harming, for how long? It is a business and they want the money to continue to flow. Those that have done wrong will continue to harm and kill, not to get prosecuted, and to continue to profit. Bush, Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Rumsfeld, and others have to know that there is a calm before the storm. There is a major push out there just waiting for Jan. 20. Many want Bush to spent the rest of his life in prison for all the fraud, lying, killing, and harming perpetrated out of his office. No matter what happens, let's stand together and not let them pull any crap. [my blog] by Steven G. Erickson (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 57 diaries, 218 comments [3 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:28:50 PM
|
|
Irrational Exuberance?
I voted for Obama instead of throwing my vote away on a third-party candidate. Does that give me the right to complain here? If not, why not? My vote was more against McCain than for Obama, and I voted for McCain in 2000 and 2004 as a write-in. That shows just how far McCain and I have diverged over the last four years, and I didn't change, he did. That said, I'm really not interested in participating in a pro-Obama circle jerk for the next 4 years, so ban me if you wish. Yes, it's nice to see the first black president. Yes, it's nice to see a straight up election for a change. Yes, it's nice to see that post-9/11 fearmongering had no effect on the populace for once. But I'm feeling a little buyer's remorse about Obama after seeing he wants to appoint Rahm Emanuel as chief of staff (who represents the worst of the Clinton years) and listening to Catherine Austin Fitts talk about Obama's economic advisors on Coast to Coast AM last night (I won't elaborate right now. Google her it you want to learn more). I want to see where Obama really stands on the offshoring of US jobs and free trade agreements that have hollowed out our manufacturing sector before I get too excited. I want to see whether he really lowers taxes for the middle class. I want to see an energy policy that does more than just tax coal-burning power plants out of existence and doubles or triples the price of electricity. I want to see if he has the guts to slap tariffs on goods made in Communist China. I want to see if he can really deal with the Iranians without being walked all over. I want to see an end to the Patriot and Military Commissions Acts. In other words, Obama has as lot to live up to. If you are so busy being enraptured about change or the idea of having a Democrat in the White House that you do not allow criticism of him, then count me out. You can ban me or I will ban myself. Right now it's easy to get caught up in the irrational exuberance and excitement of the moment. But that will fade over time when we get to see the real Obama instead of the popular myth that he is right now. by Sam Adams (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 90 comments) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:02:10 AM
|
|
Reply: Censorship? Not hardly.
The only thing Rob was asked was to have one day of the positive. You've got 364 more days to be as negative and cynical as you want to be. by JC Garrett (40 articles, 65 quicklinks, 7 diaries, 604 comments [10 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:26:05 AM
|
|
Reply: Actually, your assertion is false.
Rob stated: “I'm meeting with senior editors today and am pretty sure we're going to resolve to NOT tolerate the usual drone of complaining. Things are different now. Think about how YOU can help, not just grouse about past weather. And this is not just for you Richard.” Obviously that is not a statement referring to just one day of myopic enthusiasm. by richard (0 articles, 5 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 1359 comments [400 recommended, 8 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:18:27 AM
|
|
If only People had read just a bit more of the FACTS RE: GW
... regarding G.W. Bush, from at-about July 1999, through 2000, about his being totally corrupt and unqualified to be President, then even the Fascist machinations of Katherine Harris and her associates$ in Florida 2000, could not have taken the rightful election of Al Gore away from, that good man, as well, ... then so much could have been, so profoundly, and "world-changingly"(* don't believe that's a true term, "world-changingly," but it doth "fit," somehow!) DIFFERENT, from what it now is. But perhaps, for now at least, that's living too much in the past, i.e., the CrimeS of the twice "Elected" Bus$h Presidency need to be prosecuted, but we need to go forward(and *PROTECT Barack and his GOOD, All-American Family, and Administration, in the process!), and let us, in the "General," National Good sense of the phrase, of a plaque that I have read, please, let us not "Let Yesterday, use up all of Today". (*That said, Denny KUCINICH, is still right about his 35 Articles of the NEEDED Impeachment process; I've read from some sources that GW Bus$h can STILL be "Impeached," or at least, prosecuted, long after he leaves office on January 20, 2009, A.D.) by Brian O'Moore (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 49 comments [2 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:10:40 AM
|
|
Eyes Wide Open
Great job Richard No way they can blindfold us with a glittering façade. It is a show for fools. We will keep wondering and asking questions. Wary, skeptical, watchful and alert We have to wonder aloud when a democratic candidate with so many liabilities ( color, name, Muslim background, inexperience) waltzes right through every obstacle witout breaking a sweat and succeeds We have to wonder aloud when the corporate-far-right-owned MSM, headed by the New York Yimes, throws its unconditional support behind a democratic candidate while the same media was in accord in two previous presidential elections in demeaning and distorting everything said by a democratic candidate We have to wonder aloud when Obama stoops in front of the AIPAC offering to be their attack dog tearing to pieces any innocent bystander who happens to be disliked by the Masters We have to wonder aloud when Obama endorses a bailout which is nothing but a plain and obvious public rip-off We have to wonder aloud at his promises to straighten up the economy in a country where the only industry left intact is the military and war industry We have to wonder aloud when a candidate refuses to address and to investigate the most horrendous crime in US's history, 9/11, with its ensuing illegal wars We have to wonder aloud when Collin Powell, a far-right blood-soaked war criminal crosses lines to endorse a naive inexperienced candidate We will wonder aloud 4 years from now if Obama has actually done something positive for the ordinary people and is still alive unimpeached and untarnished by a sex scandal or other trivia As long the Federal Reserve mafia remains intact hope is not an option by ramsheyi (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 793 comments [1 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:49:05 AM
|
|
Muhammad Ali
Barak Obama's landslide victory reminds me of Muhammad Ali's great fights, when the entire world watched the perpetual underdog attempt to kill his opponent, yet sensed in him a man of peace. When he won, the world arose in joyous celebration, internalizing his power, and believing that they too could take on superior powers and prevail. For many a white youth, Ali was their first African American hero, crashing through the glass ceiling with the power of his punches, as their parents hoped desperately for his defeat. If nothing else, Barak Obama's victory has given black Americans that final vestige of American citizenship which they have thus far lacked. As Whoopi Goldberg put it, "I've always felt like I was an American, but now I feel like I can put my suitcase down." This feeling will forever bond American blacks to this land and to the American people at large, and America will always be a better place because of it. Obama may make many mistakes. He may not be a savior. It seems impossible that he could live up to the expectations that he, himself, has created. But by his mere victory, he has changed the tale of America, and he has created a mass movement that he can use for good or for ill. The least that can be said is that he is unlikely to start WWIII, which is more than could be said for his opponent. by W.M.L. (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 537 comments [52 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:37:31 PM
|
|
it's the cabinet
Will Dennis Kucinich be the new Attorney general?. I don't think so Is emanuael a known entity. I think the facts are in fact the facts, no? What Richard wrote out are Obama's positions. His positions seem horizontal to me. Should we see what he does? ofcourse. Should we walk around in a trance because he won? With all this blubbering slovenly sentimental cases I think Richard may be just fine to counterbalance some meshuganah sappy emotions. I think it is disgusting to attack Richard for not diving into this messiah crapola. Is he gonna be better than Bush,? you betcha. Is he gonna be the same as Clinton? We shall see. We need to respect eachother. The pseudo psychological criticsm of Richard is nothing more than name calling. I thought name calling was not acceptable. by robert braunstein (60 articles, 0 quicklinks, 21 diaries, 194 comments [40 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Thursday, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:57:59 PM
|
|
Beautiful
-- both Rob's essay and your reply. This one I'll keep open on my browser for some time to come, refreshing it each day to see what new comments have been added. You've inspired me to post something I finally found words for on Wednesday evening: ____________ Re: WOOOOHOOOOOOOOO! - and that gaping, ringing feeling . . the feeling of all possibilities palpably open (as perhaps they've always been), but the high and worthy ones no more than the awful and evil ones. Amen to the prayer request for Obama's safety and preservation. My first thought on his taking the stage last night was: "Here it is, the Secret Service's worst nightmare waiting to happen." Then I noticed what seemed to be transparent deflective shields of some sort, ranged around at least part of that long proscenium. * I wish the concession speech had left out this final jab: "Let there be no reason now for any American to fail to cherish their citizenship in this, the greatest nation on Earth." We don't need resentful reminders of me first (or "me-already" -- most often long overdue and justified) or especially country first. We need to hear and accept the challenge of humanity first, brothers and sisters united in the mission to lift one another and in every way to restore the planet, our common home. We can only be "the greatest nation on Earth" through the path of humble service, realizing that with great abundance comes great responsibility. This is the substance of our honorable call to "make history," in McCain's constant refrain. by editnetwork (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 73 comments) on Friday, Nov 7, 2008 at 6:20:20 AM
|
|
Reply: Apologies for broken link
I meant to post this in reply to Muservin, far above. by editnetwork (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 73 comments) on Friday, Nov 7, 2008 at 6:22:07 AM
|
|
Sigh of Relief
The end of tyraney has come, how good it feels. After eight eight years of our freedooms stripped from us and the facist leadership that has lead this country its over. Obama will lead this country with a renewed spirit and purpose. We must bring legal action against Bush and his cronies for all the laws they broken. Yes the light is brighter today then yesterdaY. by Bradley A Harris (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 6 comments) on Saturday, Nov 8, 2008 at 3:02:47 PM
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |