Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   No comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The White House, The President "Can Go It Alone" in Attacking Syria

By       Message Dave Lefcourt     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 8/30/13

- Advertisement -

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/35034347485@N01/8807166976/: Not to be messed with
Not to be messed with by allaboutgeorge

CNN photo of President Obama under the headline Obama, "U.S. Not To Be Messed With"

Unable to achieve a "coalition of the willing" with the British Parliament yesterday nixing Prime Minister David Cameron's plea for Britain to join the U.S. in attacking Syria, the White House says, "Obama can act alone".

What the "legal" basis for this latest misadventure by the U.S. government is simply : The President can do it. What else is there?

White House spokesmen have said he doesn't have to go to Congress, the U.N. Security Council is certain to veto the idea and besides "it's too late" as far as waiting for the U.N. chemical inspectors to give their report on the alleged gas attacks in Syria nine days ago.

Besides the British Parliament some 200 members of the U.S. House of Representatives in a rare bi-partisan showing want the president to present his case to the Congress before taking any action on Syria.

And according to accounts by a few high ranking retired military officers as well as some active duty officers, all have expressed skepticism of what would be the end game of a missile attack on Syria with deep concerns of what surely will be unintended consequences spurred by such an attack.

Of course the specter of the Bush administrations false account of Iraq's Saddam Hussein having WMD in 2003 weighed heavily in the British Parliament's decision and presumably behind the 200 members of the House being skeptical of the administrations plans to attack.

- Advertisement -

Even the American people in polls are overwhelmingly against a U.S. attack on Syria, they too remembering the charade given by Colin Powell at the U.N. in February, 2003 presenting "incontrovertible" evidence of Iraq's WMD, (which of course was proven to be a total fabrication).

Supposedly the Obama administration has "incontrovertible" evidence of Basher Assad being responsible for the gas attack last week.

However, no such "evidence" has been made public, just some allegations presented to a few Congressional leaders and even that was reportedly not the "smoking gun" leaving no doubt Assad authorized the attack.

So now we get "the president can act alone" in authorizing an attack on Syria. But it would be an illegal, reprehensible, un-Constitutional act of aggression and a crime against humanity against a country that has not attacked the U.S. or is an imminent threat to do so, (the ONLY legal basis to go to war).

If Obama does authorize a missile attack on Syria, this could be his "Waterloo" moment. With Democrats in the White House going all the way back to Lyndon Johnson and Viet Nam, the rationale for taking aggressive action has been fear of an attack by Republican right wingers. That continues with likes of Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham but now include the unhinged neo-conservative crazies pushing for regime change in Syria with Iran next on their agenda.

- Advertisement -

And let's not forget the Israeli government in this Syrian imbroglio. It is their "intelligence" on Assad's chemical weapons that the White House is purportedly trotting out as the basis for an attack on Syria. Throw in Israel's obsession with Iran developing a nuclear capability (and Syria being its primary ally along with Russia) and voila a new unnecessary war is on the near horizon with "unforeseeable consequences" sure to result.

From here it's reminiscent of the alliances of antagonists in 1914 before the onset of W.W. I. Think that probability is too much of a stretch; think again.    

 

View Ratings | Rate It

dglefc22733@aol.com
Retired. The author of "DECEIT AND EXCESS IN AMERICA, HOW THE MONEYED INTERESTS HAVE STOLEN AMERICA AND HOW WE CAN GET IT BACK", Authorhouse, 2009

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

CIA in the Crosshairs

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".