Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
6 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Way to Occupy a Bank is to Own One

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 6   Well Said 5   News 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H1 12/16/11
Become a Fan
  (155 fans)

opednews.com


Own Bank by ugoto.com


The campaign to "move your money" has gotten a groundswell of support. Having greater impact would be to "move our money" -- move our local government revenues out of Wall Street banks into our own publicly-owned banks.


Occupy Wall Street has been both criticized and applauded for not endorsing any official platform.   But there are unofficial platforms, including one titled the 99% Declaration which calls for a "National General Assembly" to convene on July 4, 2012 in Philadelphia.   The 99% Declaration seeks everything from reining in the corporate state to ending the Fed to eliminating censorship of the Internet.   But none of these demands seems to go to the heart of what prompted Occupiers to camp out on Wall Street in the first place -- a corrupt banking system that serves the 1% at the expense of the 99%.   To redress that, we need a banking system that serves the 99%

Occupy San Francisco has now endorsed a plan aimed at doing just that.   In a December 1 Wall Street Journal article titled "Occupy Shocker: A Realistic, Actionable Idea," David Weidner writes:

[P]rotesters in the Bay Area, especially Occupy San Francisco, have something their East Coast neighbors don't: a realistic plan aimed at the heart of banks. The idea could be expanded nationwide to send a message to a compromised Washington and the financial industry.

It's called a municipal bank. Simply put, it would transfer the City of San Francisco's bank accounts--about $2 billion now spread between such banks as Bank of America Corp., UnionBanCal Corp. and Wells Fargo & Co.--into a public bank. That bank would use small local banks to lend to the community.

The public bank concept is not new.   It has been proposed before in San Francisco and has a successful 90-year track record in North Dakota.   Weidner notes that the state-owned Bank of North Dakota earned taxpayers more than $61 million last year and reported a profit of $57 million in 2008, when Bank of America had a $1.2 billion net loss.   The San Francisco bank proposal is sponsored by city supervisor John Avalos, who has been thinking about a municipal bank for several years.  

Weidner calls the proposal "the boldest institutional stroke yet against banks targeted by the Occupy movement."  

Responding to the Critics

He acknowledges that it will be an uphill climb.   In a follow-up article on December 6th, Weidner wrote:

Of course, there are critics. . . . They argue that public banks would put public money at risk.   Would you be surprised to know that most of the critics are bankers?

That's why you don't hear them talking about the $100 billion they lost for the California pension funds in 2008.   They don't talk about the foreclosures that have wrought havoc on communities and tax revenues.   They don't talk about liar loans and what kind of impact that's had on the economy, employment and the real estate market -- not to mention local and state budgets.

Risk to the taxpayers remains the chief objection of banker opponents.   "There is no need for such lending," they say.   "We already provide loans to any creditworthy applicant who comes to us.   Why put taxpayer money at risk, lending for every crackpot scheme that some politician wants to waste taxpayer money on?"

Tom Hagan, who pays taxes in Maine, has a response to that argument.   In a December 3rd letter to the editor in the Press Herald (Portland), he maintained there is no need to invest public bank money in risky retail ventures.   The money could be saved for infrastructure projects, at least while the public banking model is being proven.   The salubrious result could be to cut local infrastructure costs in half.   Making his case in conjunction with a Maine turnpike project, he wrote:

Why does Maine pay double for turnpike improvements?

Improvements are funded by bonds issued by the Maine Turnpike Authority, which collects the principal amounts, then pays the bonds back with interest.

Over time, interest payments add up to about the original principal, doubling the cost of turnpike improvements and the tolls that must be collected to pay for them. The interest money is shipped out of state to Wall Street banks.

Why not keep the interest money here in Maine, to the benefit of all Mainers? This could be done by creating a state-owned bank. State funds now deposited in low- or no-interest checking accounts would instead be deposited in the state bank.

Those funds would be used to buy up the authority bonds and municipal bonds issued by the Maine Bond Bank. All of them. Since all interest payments would flow into the state treasury, we would end up paying half what we now pay for our roads, bridges and schools.

North Dakota has profited from a state-owned bank for 90 years. Why not Maine?

The state bank could generate "bank credit" on its books, as all chartered banks are authorized to do.   This credit could then be used to buy the bonds.   The government's deposits would not be "spent" but would remain in the government's account, as safe as they are in Bank of America--arguably more so, since the solvency of the public bank would be guaranteed by the local government.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of twelve books including the best-selling WEB OF DEBT. In THE PUBLIC BANK SOLUTION, her latest book, she explores successful public banking models historically and (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

It's the Derivatives, Stupid! Why Fannie, Freddie and AIG Had to Be Bailed Out

Mysterious Prison Buses in the Desert

LANDMARK DECISION PROMISES MASSIVE RELIEF FOR HOMEOWNERS AND TROUBLE FOR BANKS

Libya: All About Oil, or All About Central Banking?

Borrowing from Peter to Pay Paul: The Wall Street Ponzi Scheme Called Fractional Reserve Banking

"Oops, We Meant $7 TRILLION!" What Hank and Ben Are Up to and How They Plan to Pay for It All

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Brown has championed this cause for a long time. I... by R A Bows on Friday, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:06:56 PM
States, counties, and cities opening their own ban... by Ernie Messerschmidt on Friday, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:00:13 PM
Do you have any idea how much money is invested wi... by Peter Selby on Sunday, Dec 18, 2011 at 1:20:04 AM
that color background and font you chose is really... by Kevin Gallagher on Monday, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:52:18 AM
Hi Ellen Brown. I just now discovered the followin... by Daniel Penisten on Tuesday, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:32:54 PM
I see public banking at the state and local levels... by Luis Magno on Tuesday, Dec 20, 2011 at 7:59:15 PM