OpEdNews Op Eds

The United States Needs SENSIBLE Gun Legislation Now

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

 

It drives me crazy when I hear people say that guns don't kill people. They put this out there as if to negate the fact that these mass murderers, like the one in Newton, Connecticut this past week, are in fact using guns to do their killing. These recent events once again bring to light the need for comprehensive gun control legislation in the United States.

While the right to bear arms may be protected in the U.S. Constitution, it has very little to do with protecting the rights of the individual to possess and use death machines on an unsuspecting public.  However, that is not to say that guns do not have any place in our society.

I grew up in a hunting household.  Therefore, I know firsthand that whether someone personally believes in the sport of hunting or not is irrelevant to the fact that this is an American right. The vast majority of hunters will never use a gun to do anything but kill game. However, I don't think that legislation in our country ever need impede on the rights of these individuals. The type of legislation I'm talking about is in regards to multi-clip, multi-round assault weapons.

Let's face it, no hunter needs more than a few rounds to participate in their sport. A rifle holds several shots, a shotgun two and a pistol six. One does not need any more rounds than this to go hunting and if they do they should immediately return to a hunter safety course or the closest shooting range for practice. Yet, the Republicans in Congress, who remain in the pocket of the National Rifle Association, have allowed the assault weapon ban, which limited magazine capacity to ten, to expire in 2004 and have prevented it's reenactment since.

While the NRA has continued to donate heavily to the GOP, many innocent people have died in the United States directly because of these assault-type weapons. There is no person in this country that needs access to a gun that shoots a hundred bullets without needing to be reloaded unless they work for law enforcement.

Let's not even start this crap about how bad people will do these bad things regardless.  While that may be true, their ability to kill as many people in the blink of an eye as happened in Newton will be greatly reduced if we put a strong assault weapon ban back in place.

Newton, Aurora, Columbine and the list goes one.  Instead of getting our backs up about our individual rights, we ought to take a step back in United States to think about how many lives could have been saved had we cared more about the safety of our people than the lobbying dollars of the gun industry.

 

Comedienne, actress, personality, writer, and producer extraordinaire! You can find Jeza writing pearls of draggy wisdom, performing comedy, or just plain acting the fool for camera. Check out the latest at www.iamjezabelle.com or find her on (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

This Drag Queen's View of Conservatives Dobson's and Huckabee's Gay Related Newtown Responses

The United States Needs SENSIBLE Gun Legislation Now

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Why is the news reported the way it is? What I mea... by Steven G. Erickson on Thursday, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:11:59 PM