Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Uncomfortable Absence of Safety

By       Message Richard Girard     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 1/10/10

Author 149
Become a Fan
  (40 fans)
- Advertisement -

"A murderer is regarded by the conventional world as something almost monstrous, but a murderer to himself is only an ordinary man. . . . It is only if the murderer is a good man that he can be regarded as monstrous."

Graham Greene (1904-91), British novelist. The Ministry of Fear, book 1, chapter 7, section 1 (1943).

"A desperate disease requires a dangerous remedy."

Guy Fawkes (1570-1606), English Catholic conspirator. Quoted in: The Dictionary of National Biography, volume 6, referring to the gunpowder plot to blow up the Houses of Parliament, 5 November 1605, following the dictum of Greek physician Hippocrates.

The recent attempt by an alleged al-Qaeda operative to destroy an aircraft landing in Detroit reminded me of a very simple fact: that there is no such thing as one hundred percent safety from the acts of terrorists.

I came to this conclusion more than twenty years ago when I read the Warren Commission's Report on the Assassination of President Kennedy. One of their conclusions is that if an assassin is willing to die in the attempt, there is no way to prevent, with absolute certainty, the President's assassination.

If the government cannot guarantee absolute safety for the President, how can we, as private citizens, hope for anything close to real security from terrorists, especially when there are members of our government and ruling elites who have a vested interest in keeping us too scared to think?

- Advertisement -

I have been telling people for years that the only thing that surprised me about September 11, 2001, was that it took foreign terrorists so long to execute a high casualty major operation on American soil. The homegrown, domestic terrorist beat them to the punch in 1995 at the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City and did so with far fewer resources in terms of money and equipment.

In fact, I honestly do not believe that international terrorists represent nearly the threat to the United States that the domestic variety do.

Yes, we are more likely to receive an attack from a group of foreign terrorists that involves some form of a weapon of mass destruction (nuclear, biological, chemical, radiological). Even that is not guaranteed: we still have no idea who sent the envelopes containing anthrax spores to Senators Tom Daschle, Patrick Leahy, NBC News Anchor Tom Brokaw, and several other people in 2001, but it was almost certainly a domestic, not an international source.

For this reason, I am far more worried about an American version of Guy Fawkes than I am a Hassan ibn Sabbah reborn. After all, we have seen a number of religiously motivated, political fanatics pop up in this country already. And their numbers are growing every year.

I consider the first victim of these Guy Fawkes wannabes in camouflage to be liberal talk show host Alan Berg, here in Denver, June 18, 1984. Besides the neo-Nazis and the KKK, other groups, including the so-called Christian Identity movement, the Aryan Nations, Posse Comitatus, Operation Rescue, the Army of God, the Minutemen, the Freemen and numerous other "militia" and right wing paramilitary groups, have spawned individuals like David Lewis Rice, Eric Rudolph, Timothy McVeigh, Terry Nichols, Scott Roeder, David Lane, Ray Lampley, Paul Hill, and George Sodini. Most of these individuals' body counts have been less than a dozen people, McVeigh and Nichols being the notable exceptions. But they and their kindred spirits represent not four unthinkable incidents in a single morning, but many dozens of horrible incidents over twenty-five years. An American citizen in this country is far more likely to die or be injured at the hands of these home grown terrorists in the course of their lives, than they are some jihad-minded foreigner.

- Advertisement -

Part of our problem is that the traditional American solution to a problem--just throw money at it--does not by itself work in the long term against domestic terrorists. Much of this has to do with the fact that there are none of the traditional "choke points," such as airports, harbors, chemical plants, nuclear power stations, military and naval facilities, etc., to defend against domestic terrorists, as there are with the foreign variety. Domestic terrorists do not have to make the big statement: they simply have to wear us down, bit by bit, until we collapse like a Janga puzzle with the wrong piece removed.

The economic basis that is driving these domestic terrorists, and the cause for the anger that fuels their extremist views, is that they feel they have not only been disenfranchised, but they have been thrown down to the bottom of the economic pecking order, underneath those who they once looked on as inferiors to bolster their own self worth. Certain unscrupulous politicians have taken advantage of this perception over the last thirty years with overblown issues like "welfare queens in Cadillacs," illegal immigration, and affirmative action. These right wing demagogues have done this rather than admit the real cause of the problem: corporations shutting down American manufacturing plants and shipping them to foreign countries where labor is cheap. All of this is done in the name of an impossible ideal called "free trade," but in reality its purpose is to improve the corporate profit margin. This has made us increasingly dependent on foreign sources for not only our basic industries, but also our most advanced manufacturing processes. This is not a good position to be in if we are ever again find ourselves in a major war.

If you ever talk to someone from this school of thought, or one of its closely allied belief systems, you will discover that they blame the liberals, the Democrats, the lawyers, the media, the socialists, the Marxists, the Communists, the Congress, etc. If you ask them if they have written to their Representative or Senator, signed a petition, campaigned for a cause, or even voted in the last election, their answer is usually "No." This is invariably followed by some variant of, "It won't do any good, so why bother."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

View Ratings | Rate It

Richard Girard is an increasingly radical representative of the disabled and disenfranchised members of America's downtrodden, who suffers from bipolar disorder (type II or type III, the professionals do not agree). He has put together a team to (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Great Enemy of the Truth

Into a Thousand Pieces

The Communist Takeover of America

The Judgment of History; Or Why the Breaking of the Oligarchs Avenges President Kennedy's Assassination--Part One

Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense

Social Capitalism