OpEdNews Op Eds

The U.N.'s only progeny.

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

As the fires of Gaza subside, the Israeli PR machine is working double shift. When all else fails, conflate Judaism and Zionism to shield  Israel from legitimate criticism.   Accusations of antisemitism - old and "new" - are doled out as a means to shut down dissent, and instill intellectual terror. This dishonest misuse of "antisemitism" trivializes the word, and is manna to real anti-semites.

It is not antisemitic to condemn the murder of Palestinians, the expulsion of an indigenous civilian population, the destruction of homes, the expropriation of agricultural lands, the uprooting of trees, the restriction of freedoms of circulation, education, work, health, food and right to security and more.

It is however racist not to deplore and condemn, as forcefully as one does Israeli losses, the Palestinian deaths killed by Israeli bombing. The framing of the conflict reeks of racism. The Palestinians, the occupied people – those who are protected by humanitarian law and should therefore enjoy the protection of the international community, those who have no army, no state, no freedoms and no rights – are turned into the aggressor. The occupiers, those who boast being the 4th military power in the world, who have a nuclear arsenal and total control over the lives of Palestinians, are made out to be the victim. How Orwellian does this sound? Innocence is guilt, guilt is innocence. And still, because this is Israel, we do not dare challenge this Israeli Newspeak lexicon.

Israel is indeed special. As the only state brought to the world by the international community, Israel has received a lot of attention, has been taken care of and gotten everything it wanted whenever it wanted it. Israel believes – and the world accepts - that everyone else’s needs or rights should be subjected to its own. 

Since the partition of Palestine by a U.N. resolution, Israel has rejected all UN decisions and, like a spoiled child, has consistently challenged and undermined the U.N. ‘parental’ authority with impunity.

We are told that Israel needs security, and who doesn’t?  But to assume that Israel’s security must come at the expense of another people is unacceptable. The wars it has initiated have not brought any security to Israelis, but just the opposite.  The state of Israel has become a fortified garrison. However high its walls, they will never provide security. The violent route has shown that it leads to a cul-de-sac.


Since the Oslo Peace Accord, Palestinian living conditions have greatly deteriorated: while during the first Intifada, in spite of the harsh conditions, Palestinians were able to feed themselves, a great number now relies on humanitarian aid to survive. The reason? Israel used the period since Oslo to double its settler population – illegally – and consolidate its control over the Palestinian Occupied Territory through what Israeli Jeff Halper calls a Matrix of Control.

The options that Israel has not tried yet are: to seriously consider treating Palestinians with due respect; to abide by the rule of law; and to make way for the creation of a sovereign and viable Palestinian state. Currently, the Knesset website states that:

“The Government of Israel flatly rejects the establishment of a Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan river.
 The Palestinians can run their lives freely in the framework of self-rule, but not as an independent and sovereign state. Thus, for example, in matters of foreign affairs, security, immigration and ecology, their activity shall be limited in accordance with imperatives of Israel's existence, security and national needs.”

The first act of good faith should be to change the above statement. Then, instead of pitting Palestinian against Palestinian and taking unilateral actions, consider justice as one key element to ensuring security for both Israelis and Palestinians.

If Israel maintain its me, me, and me first attitude, the answer should be less pampering and more tough love towards the U.N.'s only progeny.

 

Bahija Reghai is a Canadian Human Rights activist and a former president of the National COuncil on Canada-Arab Relations (NCCAR).

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Canadian Policy: The Jerusalem effect

Wake Up Canada!

Canada: Women's Programs Religiously Axed

NGO Monitor: Sucking the life out of Civil society

Gaza: Responsibility to protect

How Can Terrorizing a Civilian Population be a Right?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Israel abide by the dictates of morality and human... by Robert Hoogenboom on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:56:07 PM
The rule of law within states ensures peacefu... by Bahija Reghai on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:32:13 PM
Yes, the UN spawned a maniac child. No doubt about... by William Whitten on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:51:03 AM