Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
November 2, 2008 at 06:19:40

View Ratings | Rate It

The Trouble With Nader

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Mary Shaw (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Mary Shaw - Writer

I've been hearing from a lot of progressives who insist on voting for Ralph Nader or the Green Party's Cynthia McKinney in this year's presidential election, even in the swing states. These third-party voters say that they cannot vote for Barack Obama because they feel that Obama is not a true progressive. And these people worry me.

It's not that I don't like what Ralph Nader and Cynthia McKinney stand for, because I do. These alternative candidates stand for things like universal healthcare, alternative energy, peace, civil liberties, fair labor, equal rights for women and minorities, and more -- all issues that are near and dear to my heart.

And it's not that I don't agree that Barack Obama's policies are less than ideal, because I do.


My problem with a third-party presidential vote is one of practicality. A vote for Nader or McKinney is a progressive vote flushed down the drain. If we are to believe the pollsters, the race between McCain and Obama is too close to justify a symbolic vote for a third-party candidate.

Many people blame Ralph Nader for Al Gore's loss in the 2000 presidential election. For that reason, many progressive pundits urged him not to run in 2004 and similarly jeopardize John Kerry's chances. But he ran anyway.

This year, it's deja vu all over again. And, all over again, I am frightened by it.

As much as I appreciate the idealism of these third-party voters, the electoral process isn't set up to work in their favor. We've got a two-party system in which third-party votes are potential spoilers.

But there is a way around this.

Some folks are advocating for widespread use of instant-runoff voting (IRV) as a way to eliminate the spoiler effect. In this system, voters do not vote for a single candidate. Instead, they rank the candidates in order of preference. The website FairVote.org describes the vote tallying process as follows:
IRV allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference (i.e. first, second, third, fourth and so on). Voters have the option to rank as many or as few candidates as they wish, but can vote without fear that ranking less favored candidates will harm the chances of their most preferred candidates. First choices are then tabulated, and if a candidate receives a majority of first choices, he or she is elected. If nobody has a clear majority of votes on the first count, a series of runoffs are simulated, using each voter's preferences indicated on the ballot. The candidate who received the fewest first place choices is eliminated. All ballots are then retabulated, with each ballot counting as one vote for each voter's highest ranked candidate who has not been eliminated. Specifically, voters who chose the now-eliminated candidate will now have their ballots counted for their second ranked candidate -- just as if they were voting in a traditional two-round runoff election -- but all other voters get to continue supporting their top candidate. The weakest candidates are successively eliminated and their voters' ballots are redistributed to next choices until a candidate crosses a majority of votes.
This does seem to be the answer.

But, unfortunately, IRV is not currently an option for most American voters. So, for now, we have to live by the two-party system -- and vote by it.

If John McCain wins the presidency because of progressive votes squandered on third-party candidates, it's not just those third-party voters who will have to live with the consequences. We all will.

Therefore, unless and until IRV becomes the norm in this country, Ralph Nader should stick with what he does best: Advancing the progressive agenda as an activist, not as a spoiler candidate.

And the Greens should focus their efforts downballot, where they too can be effective.

 

http://www.maryshawonline.com

Mary Shaw is a Philadelphia-based writer and activist, with a focus on politics, human rights, and social justice. She is a former Philadelphia Area Coordinator for the Nobel-Prize-winning human rights group Amnesty International, and her views (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "2008 Election Presidential"
The World Views of the U.S. Presidential Election: 2008

$90.00
Lowest New Price $77.41

Number of pages: 266
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan

The 2008 Presidential Elections: A Story in Four Acts

$80.00
Lowest New Price $68.93

Number of pages: 272
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan

Presidential Elections 1789-2008 (Presidential Elections Since 1789)
by CQ Press

$59.00

Number of pages: 417
Publisher: CQ Press

The Galvanization of the Young Vote in the 2008 Presidential Election: Lessons Learned from the Phenomenon
by Glenn Starks

$19.95

Number of pages: 88
Publisher: University Press of America

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Deja vu by slowbeer on Sunday, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:14:27 AM
3rd Party Candidates by Diane Vandermast on Sunday, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:45:48 AM
IRV by Sherry Gadberry Turner on Sunday, Nov 2, 2008 at 9:57:48 AM
IRV is achievable reform by Terry Bouricius on Monday, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:02:35 AM
The trouble with cowardly progressives by Doug Rogers on Sunday, Nov 2, 2008 at 10:08:23 AM
Vote Your Conscience by mark barnes on Sunday, Nov 2, 2008 at 10:29:17 AM
IRV helps voting vendors more than anyone by ncvoter on Sunday, Nov 2, 2008 at 11:25:38 AM
IRV Works by Craig Seeman on Sunday, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:52:58 PM
Vote for change by Bill Samuel on Sunday, Nov 2, 2008 at 2:09:44 PM
Independent voter by Kellis R. Solomon on Sunday, Nov 2, 2008 at 3:20:45 PM
IRV fails by Clay Shentrup on Sunday, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:31:59 PM
Without by Jack Harrington on Sunday, Nov 2, 2008 at 9:15:05 PM
Don't waste your vote... by Wes Rolley on Monday, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:49:18 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum