Kucinich presents his 35 Articles of Impeachment to Congress

A resolute and determined Rep Dennis Kucinich presents to Congress his 35 Articles of Impeachment on the House Floor Link CLICK HERE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDZ8seg4Nr4 including substantial evidence supporting each Charge Link CLICK HERE http://kucinich.us/impeachment/articles.pdf           

by Gene Cappa (36 articles, 0 quicklinks, 62 diaries, 262 comments) on Monday, July 28, 2008 at 9:38:43 AM
 

THE REASON FOR THIS MADNESS IS CASPIAN SEA OIL AND GAS

About 30 years ago, then President Jimmy "Mr. Peanut" Carter and his National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, had a 'peanut brain idea' that the US could take over the entire Caspian Basin mother lode of oil and natural gas if they created Al Qaeda to destabilize those Islamic areas (except for Christian Georgia) and turn them against Russia. Well, it was a nut brain idea at the time, and it is still a nut brain idea. Here we are, about three decades later, and Russia is stronger than ever while the US is sinking like the Titanic...and its dreams of hegemony over the Caspian Basin are already sitting on the bottom of the sea. You can view the following two maps in much larger form by visiting the websites and zooming in on them. This is the north and south part of just the Caspian Sea area and who holds the tracts of oil and natural gas. It is not a US Show, it is now an "international affair" and the US has no one to blame but itself.

When I first found these maps years ago (during the early part of the 9-11 Commission hearings), Amerada Hess had a prominent piece that was just outside of Iranian territorial waters. They must have decided to sell that off to someone, since Thomas Keane, 9-11 Commission Chairman, is both on the board of directors and a major shareholder in Amerada Hess. They could not stick around too long and let Americans find out that the Chairman of the 9-11 Commission and the company he represents were profiting by not looking for the truth about 9-11, or why that was used as the excuse to attack Afghanistan 'regarding a pipeline.' If you look just southwest of Baku Azerbaijan you can find them in an older oil lease as 'Delta Hess'. That is a joint venture with their good buddies from Saudi Arabia - "Delta Oil" - and Amerada Hess. Now, what America needs to see are similar maps for Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Tajikistan to see just how Big Oil has positioned itself and is still waiting for that TAP pipeline across Afghanistan to the sea. That is why Barack Obama and Zbigniew Brzezinski want to 'refocus' the US military on Afghanistan. They want to be the 'heroes' who get that pipeline deal done...a project that BushCo screwed up from day one when it invaded Afghanistan on October 7, 2001 to steal the pipeline from the Bridas Corporation. That is especially true since Zbigniew dreamed up this entire Grand Chessboard dementia due to his pathological hatred of Russia, and his obsessive desire to take the oil and gas wealth for America. Well, uh, he failed and he will continue to fail. If Barky Obama continues to listen to him (and he has no choice), Barky will fail, too. Of course, the US has been vehemently opposed to pipelines that are headed to other places and directing overall control of the Caspian Basin oil and natural gas in directions the US cannot control. Remember, it was the US goal to control it all. That's why America lied, schemed, and killed for 30 years to steal it from Russia. click here This Kazakhstan pipeline is extremely problematic to US pipedreams of controlling the Caspian Basin. It will flow major amounts of oil and natural gas to China. http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/commonwealth/ kazakhstan_pipeline_2004.pdf If you look at who is sitting on key tracts of oil and natural gas leases for the Caspian Sea alone, you'll see it is not exactly a US- dominated show. When you see my next article on this subject, you will know exactly why the US has lost the Grand Chessboard match. The WORLD won, the greed-ravaged US has lost.

by Wolfie (9 articles, 0 quicklinks, 33 diaries, 1208 comments) on Monday, July 28, 2008 at 11:32:06 AM
 

John Conyers, Study in Pathos

The only way to put impeachment on the table with John Conyers is to have him trussed up on the table on a silver platter with an apple in his mouth, which may keep him from uttering his equivocating nonsense. He is about as devoted to impeaching Bush/Cheney as Bush and Cheney are. He has got to go if impeachment is going to proceed. Figure out how to get him out of the way or make an end run around him.

by Mac McKinney (48 articles, 78 quicklinks, 180 diaries, 1137 comments) on Monday, July 28, 2008 at 11:46:09 AM
 

Cheney/Bush team determined to get impeached

The Cheney/Bush Team is apparently determined to get themselves impeached because a host of their potential misdeeds have already been openly admitted to, such as illegal spying, signing statements, and ignoring subpeonas. If they're not trying to get impeached, it sure looks like they tried real hard anyway.    

by Gene Cappa (36 articles, 0 quicklinks, 62 diaries, 262 comments) on Monday, July 28, 2008 at 1:06:47 PM
 

Chances

The chances that Conyers and Pelosi will actually open impeachment proceedings is slim and none.  The interesting event that took place last Friday, July 25th, in the House was rather revealing on both sides.  The pro-impeachment side again presented the facts and reasons requiring an impeachment investigation.  The anti-impeachment side blabbed incessantly about what they saw as partisan politics and added the "remember the terrorists" distraction attempts.  Both sides showed exactly why we desperately need impeachments proceedings to begin immediately.  The Bush administration has committed a great many crimes and the Congress that was voted in to put an end to these crimes has instead protected the criminals.  It is high time that all of these "public servants" be held accountable for their broken oaths of office and other treasonous deeds.  To not begin this grand retaking of our government would be tantamount to capitulating to the worst enemy we have ever faced, ourselves!  

by Hayesml47 (5 articles, 0 quicklinks, 4 diaries, 502 comments) on Monday, July 28, 2008 at 6:11:25 PM
 

Republican Rep Lamar Smith defends the Constitution

We should not underestimate the gravity of the case against the president. When he put his hand on the Bible and recited his oath of office, he swore to faithfully uphold the laws of the United States - not some laws, all laws.

As to the uniqueness of the office the president holds, he is a person in a position of immense authority and influence. He influences the lives of millions of Americans. When he took the oath of office, he swore to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.

When someone is elected president, they receive the greatest gift possible from the American people, their trust. To violate that trust is to raise questions about fitness for office. My constituents often remind me that if anyone else in a position of authority - for example, a business executive, a military officer or a professional educator - had acted as the evidence indicates the president did, their career would be over.

The rules under which President Nixon would have been tried for impeachment had he not resigned contain this statement: "The office of the president is such that it calls for a higher level of conduct than the average citizen in the United States." This will not be an easy task. In fact, it is a difficult ordeal for all Americans, but we will get through it. We are a great nation and a strong people.

Our country will endure because our Constitution works and has worked for over 200 years. As much as one might wish to avoid this process, we must resist the temptation to close our eyes and pass by.

The president's actions must be evaluated for one simple reason: the truth counts. As the process goes forward, some good lessons can be reaffirmed. No one is above the law; actions have consequences, always tell the truth. We the people should insist on these high ideals.

That the president has fallen short of the standard doesn't mean we should lower it. If we keep excusing away the president's actions we as a nation will never climb upwards because there will be no firm rungs.

by Gene Cappa (36 articles, 0 quicklinks, 62 diaries, 262 comments) on Monday, July 28, 2008 at 6:43:38 PM
 

Republican Rep Sensenbrenner defends the rule of law

…being a poor example isn't grounds for impeachment; undermining the rule of law is.

When Americans come to Washington, they see the words "equal justice under law" carved in the facade of the Supreme Court building. Those words mean that the weak and the poor have an equal right to justice, as do the rich and the powerful.

The framers of the Constitution devised an elaborate system of checks and balances to ensure our liberty by making sure that no person, institution or branch of government became so powerful that a tyranny could be established in the United States of America. Impeachment is one of the checks the framers gave the Congress to prevent the executive or judicial branches from becoming corrupt or tyrannical.

I do so with no joy but without apologies, just as those on this committee who voted to impeach President Nixon, 24 years ago, did. Watergate and the Nixon impeachment reversed the results of an overwhelming election and were extremely divisive to our country, but America emerged from that national nightmare a much stronger country and will do so again after this sad part of our history is over. What is on trial here is the truth and the rule of law.

by Gene Cappa (36 articles, 0 quicklinks, 62 diaries, 262 comments) on Monday, July 28, 2008 at 8:41:25 PM
 

Republican Howard Coble defends his duty

Hon. Howard Coble (NC) Phone (202) 225-3065 . Fax: (202) 225-8611

Much has been made about the absence of bipartisanship on this issue, and I want to reiterate my position on that. Do not point accusatory fingers at Republicans or Democrats because there is disagreement. Assuming we vote our consciences and exercise sound judgment, little else can be asked.

...I take umbrage to charges that some are out to get the president...I take umbrage as well to those who claim that some approach this arduous task in a gleeful manner. I take no joy in discharging this duty before us, but it remains our duty nonetheless.

...I can't see that this is going to shut down the government or tie it up, assuming it does advance to the Senate.

by Gene Cappa (36 articles, 0 quicklinks, 62 diaries, 262 comments) on Monday, July 28, 2008 at 8:45:51 PM
 

Republican Elton Gallegly defends the Constitution

Hon. Elton Gallegly (CA) Phone (202) 225-5811 . Fax (202) 225-1100

This has been a very trying time. In a democracy, there are few more serious acts than to consider the possible impeachment of a president. I can tell you in true conscience it has caused me many sleepless nights.

I wanted to hear the evidence that would prove the charges were false. I believed that was the only fair way to proceed, and it was also my solemn constitutional duty and immense responsibility. I waited, I read, and I listened.

Mr. Chairman, I'm not a lawyer -- one of the few on this committee -- however, everyone that knows me knows I believe in the rule of law -- believe the rule of law is fundamental to our society. A society without laws is anarchy. Societies that ignore the laws are condemned to violence and chaos.

That bothers me. My district is considered among the safest communities in the nation. We have fine police officers, which certainly helps, but every officer from the chief to the beat officer will tell you a low crime rate begins with citizens who obey the law. Every citizen must obey the law, every law.

He violated the Constitution. To condone this would be to condemn our society to anarchy. Mr. Chairman, I cannot and will not condone such action.

by Gene Cappa (36 articles, 0 quicklinks, 62 diaries, 262 comments) on Monday, July 28, 2008 at 8:52:16 PM
 

Republican Bob Goodlatte doing his constitutional duty

Hon. Bob Goodlatte (VA) Phone (202) 225-5431 . Fax (202) 225-9681

Mr. Chairman, this is a somber occasion. I am here because it is my constitutional duty, as it is the constitutional duty of every member of this committee, to follow the truth wherever it may lead. Our Founding Fathers established this nation on a fundamental yet at the time untested idea that a nation should be governed not by the whims of any man but by the rule of law. Implicit in that idea is the principle that no one is above the law, including the chief executive

Since it is the rule of law that guides us, we must ask ourselves what happens to our nation if the rule of law is ignored, cheapened or violated, especially at the highest level of government. Consider the words of former Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, who was particularly insightful on this point. "In a government of laws, the existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. If government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for the law. It invites every man to become a law unto himself."

Mr. Chairman, we must ask ourselves what our failure to uphold the rule of law will say to the nation, and most especially to our children, who must trust us to leave them a civilized nation where justice is respected.

If we truly respect the presidency, we cannot allow the president to be above the law. Millions of law-abiding Americans from all walks of life, including my constituents, put in an honest day's work, follow the rules and struggle to teach their children respect for the law and the importance of integrity. When a factory worker or a medical doctor or a retiree breaks the law, they do so with the knowledge that they are not above the law.

This same principle must also apply to the most powerful and privileged in our nation, including the president of the United States. To lose this principle devastates a legacy entrusted to us by our founding fathers and protected for us by generations of American families.

I have a constitutional duty to follow the truth wherever it leads. The truth in this case leads me to believe that the president knowingly engaged in a calculated pattern of lies, deceit and delay in order to mislead the American people…

The precious legacy entrusted to us by our founders and our constituents is a nation dedicated to the ideal of freedom and equality for all her people. This committee must decide whether we will maintain our commitment to the rule of law and pass this precious legacy to our children and grandchildren, or whether we will bow to the political pressure for the sake of convenience or expediency.

by Gene Cappa (36 articles, 0 quicklinks, 62 diaries, 262 comments) on Monday, July 28, 2008 at 8:55:17 PM
 

Republican Steve Chabot upholds his oath of office

Hon. Steve Chabot (OH) Phone (202) 225-2216 .  (202) 225-3012

Thank you. Mr. Chairman, every member of our committee recognizes that this is likely the most important vote we will ever cast, and all of us would prefer that the president's actions had not led us down this fateful path. However, we have sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution and we must fully accept that responsibility.

Back in 1974, Congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzman, who served on the judiciary committee during Watergate, said that she would vote to impeach President Nixon, in part, because -- and I quote -- "the presidential cover-up is continuing even through today."

The historic record, the law, and the Constitution tell us that the charges against the president do indeed rise to the level of impeachable offenses. They constitute serious violations of criminal law and fall squarely within our Founding Fathers' definition of "high crimes and misdemeanors."

Mr. Chairman, impeaching the president is an extremely serious matter. Throughout these proceedings, I've tried to keep an open mind, giving the president every opportunity to refute the facts that have been laid before our committee, but now all of the evidence is in and a decision is at hand.

It has become apparent to me that impeachment is the only remedy that adequately addresses this president's illegal and unethical acts. Allowing the president's actions to go unpunished would gravely damage the Office of the President, our judicial system and our country.

I have not reached this decision lightly. I have done my share of soul searching, I have listened carefully to the views of my constituents, and I've reviewed the evidence in excruciating detail. And much of it wasn't particularly pleasant, I can assure you. And I've been guided by our Constitution.

When we cast our votes, we are not voting as Republicans or Democrats, we are voting as Americans. Our allegiance does not lie with any one president but with our country. Our charge is not handed down from any one political party but from the Constitution. Every member of this body is duty-bound to put politics aside, follow our conscience, and uphold our oath of office.

by Gene Cappa (36 articles, 0 quicklinks, 62 diaries, 262 comments) on Monday, July 28, 2008 at 8:58:19 PM
 

Republican Chris Cannon must impeach to perform his duty

Hon. Chris Cannon (UT) Phone (202) 225-7751 . Fax (202) 225-5629

We are at a defining moment in our history. What we do here will set the standard for what is acceptable for this and future presidents.

I believe profoundly that the behavior of this president is unacceptable because I agree with John Jay, one of our Founding Fathers, who said, "When oaths cease to be sacred, our dearest and most valuable rights become insecure."

[Quoting President John F. Kennedy], "I think you gentlemen should recognize the responsibility of the president of the United States. His responsibility is different from what your responsibility may be. In this country, I carry out and execute the laws of the United States. I also have the obligation of implementing the orders of the courts of the United States. And I can assure you that who's ever president of the United States, he will do the same, because if he did not, he would begin to unwind this most extraordinary constitutional system of ours. So I believe strongly in fulfilling my oath in that regard." And that regard means if he didn't fulfill his oath, the system would begin to unwind. It's inexorable.

I submit that in the spirit of our Founding Fathers and John F. Kennedy, that our first duty is to provide for the security of the fundamental rights of Americans.

To properly perform that duty, we must vote to impeach the president. Thank you.

by Gene Cappa (36 articles, 0 quicklinks, 62 diaries, 262 comments) on Monday, July 28, 2008 at 9:01:05 PM