Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 6   Must Read 5   Supported 3   View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (14 comments)

The Right to get High

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (18 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Every year or two some public figure gets in trouble and I feel compelled
to write yet another version of my drug-prohibition injustice column.
Last year it was Lance Armstrong. This time it's Ron Washington.

For those of you who don't know, Ron Washington is the manager--for the
moment--of the Texas Rangers baseball team. He tested positive for
cocaine last year; he said he used it once.

I hope that's a lie, because he's had to abase himself enough to cover an
eight-ball. That one high got him three weeks in rehab, and now he can't
take a leak without some putz holding a cup under his putz. All because
he wanted to have a little fun, off the field, on his own time, with
demon coke.

So here we go again. Another victim of our crazy buzz-phobia. Ron
Washington isn't going to jail for his sin, but he could have.

Railing about our inhumane, ineffective, counterproductive and just plain
evil drug policies is an exercise in futility, the Super Bowl of
frustration.

Sisyphus had it easy. He only had to roll a rock up a mountain. Trying
to change our drug laws is like rolling a mountain up a rock. Sisyphus
was a sissy.



Well, I'm done with half measures. If you are trying to do the
impossible, you might as well ask for the impossible. Once and for all.
No more compromises, no more nibbling around the edges, no more happy
talk and BS excuses. The whole drug law edifice is rotten, rotten to the
core. It must go.

The most damaging thing about drugs isn't drugs. It's jail. Drug
prohibition is a murder machine powering failed states. The most
poisonous drug is lead.

Drug laws aren't about social control, they're not about crime, they make
crimes, they're about sin, they're the product of theocracy.

A free, secular, society is one where nobody has to power to dictate what
you can put into your body. In a free society, you own that body. You
can put whatever you want into it and you can put it into what and
whoever consents.

It's taken a couple of hundred years but we've finally allowed the
latter. The sodomy laws were religious laws as well. Homosexuality was
banned because it was considered a sin; there is no other reason, or
rather excuse, to justify criminalizing that ineradicable human behavior.
So now it's legal to commit sodomy, a mere three thousand years since
they invented it in Sodom.

There is no difference with drugs. Pills, powders or penises, it's all
the same. It's your body. It's your choice. You are free to do as you
wish.

Otherwise freedom is a lie. What good is freedom if you are only free to
do what the government deems "good?" You have the right to get high.

The Founding Fathers left that out of the Constitution. They left out
the right to bear arms, too, but they quickly jammed it into the bill of
rights. We've been paying for that freedom ever since. Supposedly it's
helped keep tyranny at bay. But there's still plenty of tyranny around
when it comes to what we're allowed to do with our bodies.

It is time to rectify that mistake. I hereby propose this 28th amendment
to the Constitution.

"A well-regulated mood being necessary to the pursuit of happiness,
Congress shall make no law abridging the right of the people to get
high."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

San Francisco based columnist, author, gym rat and novelist. My book, "The Confessions of a Catnip Junkie" is the best memoir ever written by a cat. Available on Amazon.com, or wherever fine literature is sold with no sales tax collected. For (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Beautifully put by Carol Cleveland on Sunday, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:00:48 AM
Beautifully elaborated by Allan Goldstein on Tuesday, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:15:29 AM
Then keep going! by Carol Cleveland on Tuesday, Mar 23, 2010 at 6:12:08 AM
Why An Amendment? by arlen custer on Sunday, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:17:51 PM
I agree with 95% of what you stated. by William Cormier on Sunday, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:21:22 PM
I'll take it by Allan Goldstein on Tuesday, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:23:44 AM
Freedom by Bob Gormley on Sunday, Mar 21, 2010 at 5:05:30 PM
It's not me "crying," But the lives it ruins by William Cormier on Sunday, Mar 21, 2010 at 5:38:22 PM
All good points by arlen custer on Sunday, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:20:51 PM
Unfortunately... by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Sunday, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:00:04 PM
True by arlen custer on Monday, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:10:28 AM
OK except for children by Perry Logan on Monday, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:26:20 AM
Totally, Perry by Allan Goldstein on Tuesday, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:26:11 AM
Right, but not an insoluble problem by Carol Cleveland on Tuesday, Mar 23, 2010 at 6:27:51 AM