Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 10   Supported 6   Valuable 6   View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (68 comments)

The Republican plan to wreck the economy and then blame the Dems. Will it work?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (95 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

The Republican Party and its powerful allies in the right-wing news media made it clear from the moment Barack Obama took office that they would demonize everything he tried to do, especially with respect to the economy.

Knowing that progressives had no comparable media infrastructure with which to respond and that many Democrats would cower when attacked the Republicans now appear to have convinced many Americans to hand congressional power back to the GOP, a situation that Stephen Crockett addresses in this Consortium News article, a synopsis of which follows here.

Republicans in Congress have decided that sabotaging economic recovery and employment growth is their best tactic for electoral gains in November as long as they can pin the blame for all the joblessness and the bad economy on the Democrats. And this it seems fairly likely they will succeed in doing, given that most Dem voters are essentially asleep at the wheel when it comes to really understanding how our political economic system works. Signs of this Republican plan have been cropping up since the Democratic victories in 2008.

Here are the things you need to understand, to clearly see how this Republican plan will work:

1. Economic recessions and depressions almost always result from insufficient "effective" consumer demand for goods and services produced domestically. In economic terms, merely wanting something does not constitute "effective demand." For a want to become an "effective" demand for goods or services, it must be accompanied by the monetary ability to actually make the purchase.

2. Jobs are not created by just having large pools of investment money available, as most big corporations and banks now do. There must also be the opportunity to invest in a business that will have customers who have the money to buy the goods and services. Then and only then will investment money flow into business opportunities and job creation.

3. Over the last 30 years, the Republican-Right economic theory that economic prosperity and employment automatically "trickle-down from the wealthy" has been proven again and again to be fallacious. Tax cuts for the wealthy create huge investment money pools -- but not jobs.

4. Republicans are seeking to extend the tax cuts for the wealthy by falsely stating that increases in taxes for the upper 2% of income earners would hurt demand and prolong the economic downturn. Experience and history prove otherwise. The large majority of buying is done by the remaining 98% of the population. The top 2% invest much of their income, rather than spend it on consumer goods. Besides, compared to the rest of us, there are not that many of them.

Implications for the larger economy

Tax cuts at the highest marginal income brackets simply serve to concentrate wealth and political power in the hands of the economic elite. This power of the economic elite then pushes government policy in directions that dramatically cut the percentage of the nation's wealth and income that goes to the large majority of Americans. And this has been happening for at least the last 30 years. Hence the decimation of America's middle class.

The ever reduced incomes and wealth holdings of the middle class cuts into the ability of most Americans to buy goods and services. As a result, the economy falters because most customers do not have enough disposable income to keep the flow of goods and services at a level that is sufficient to generate the number of jobs and the kind of incomes that a vibrant economy and a healthy middle class requires.

That part of the national income that previously (prior to 1975) would have ended up in the hands of America's great middle class, as disposable income, has for more than 30 years been increasingly diverted into the pockets of our economic elite who, because they already had more money than they could possibly spend on goods and services, have used most of this recent "windfall money" to invest in things that turned out to be "bubbles." As a result, sound business enterprises lacked the numbers of middle class customers they had always depended upon. As a result, many such businesses faltered and had to start laying off employees and/or moving their factories or other operations to low-wage countries.


Why middle-class tax cuts are important for the economy

Middle-class tax cuts increase the disposable income of those members of society who spend the vast majority of their incomes and have little left over to save. The money changes hands over and over again (instead of either creating some kind of investment bubble here or being invested in a foreign country like China or Brazil). This is the great multiplier effect that people learn about when they take a course in, or read a basic text on, economics. Extending unemployment benefits has a huge multiplier effect as well. This is because unemployment benefits are so very badly needed by the recipients that virtually every penny of it gets spent on goods and services, immediately.

Excessive concentration of wealth and income in the hands of the financial elite stifles this kind of middle class spending and thus cripples our economy. And even though all the Republican policies for the past 100 years have been designed to concentrate wealth and income in the hands of the very few, and have always had the effect of crippling the economy, the political-economic dogma of the hard right obviously does not die easily. Why not? Because the very rich spend billions every year keeping it alive! For what purpose? For the purpose of multiplying their incomes, through tax breaks won in Congress by the politicians whose campaigns they pay for, and through the huge sums of money they can "earn" by buying stocks cheap after a market crash, and then selling 'dear' after the market recovers.

Some other ways that the bought-and-paid-for politicians of the rich help their masters stay rich

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Expose the Republican destruction of our economy

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://www.TechEditingServices.com

Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've always (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
68 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Great intro by Suzana Megles on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:07:58 AM
Dems create prosperity, GOP pockets it by martinweiss on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:21:20 AM
Huh? by Hayesml47 on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:33:23 AM
REPUBLICAN PLAN TO WRECK THE ECONOMY by BARB BF on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:42:45 AM
Be careful while you are politically sleepwalking,... by John Sanchez Jr. on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 9:32:27 AM
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ by Maxwell on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:11:42 AM
To clarify Mr. Sanchez for you, Barb by Ian MacLeod on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:18:17 AM
It's a damn shame: by Richard Clark on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:54:04 AM
Here Comes the Helmet Dance! by Michael Olympia on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 9:26:21 AM
Can we get everyone to write in "no one"? by Paul Kruger on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:44:57 AM
I used the same reasoning, but this time by Philip Pease on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 11:14:31 AM
Your multiplier is fantasy by Phil Weingart on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 9:46:52 AM
brainwashed by liberalsrock on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:28:03 AM
What's that trickling down YOUR leg, Phil? by Bia Winter on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:32:33 AM
Wow by Michael Olympia on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:16:12 PM
What kind of non partisan politics do you want? by BFalcon on Sunday, Aug 15, 2010 at 8:28:29 AM
The Democrats went to the same driving school... by Laura Roberts on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:03:18 PM
wow.2 by Michael Olympia on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 7:35:14 PM
Oh and... by Laura Roberts on Saturday, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:41:03 PM
Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, a Republican? by BFalcon on Sunday, Aug 15, 2010 at 8:24:40 AM
Reply to Phil by Richard Clark on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 11:29:45 AM
Actually,... by John Sanchez Jr. on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:28:38 PM
Very good points, John by Richard Clark on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:48:14 PM
Laughable... by Steven Leser on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:55:01 PM
This is my take.... by Paul Kruger on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:29:36 AM
The GOP began wrecking the U.S. economy after the by Stanimal on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:40:13 AM
Let's play Blame-a-Dem by Perry Logan on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:11:09 PM
Tea Party anyone? by Hayesml47 on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:06:34 PM
Obama is a republican by Debbie S on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:56:20 PM
This article is way too long and . . . by Ed Tubbs on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:43:25 PM
Does it matter? by Philip Pease on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:50:44 PM
Richard Clark must be my Clone by Freddie Venezia on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:06:50 PM
Guys, they have won. by Jack Lohman on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:07:20 PM
Property party by Jan Daniel on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:40:46 PM
Nice try but normal people are too smart for that. by Bob Frapples on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 9:33:44 PM
Portugal, Spain, Greece and Italy are not run by Democrats by Steven Leser on Friday, Aug 6, 2010 at 11:07:39 PM
very typical of rank and file democrats by Bob Frapples on Saturday, Aug 7, 2010 at 8:47:05 AM
Democrats pushing failed policies by Bob Frapples on Saturday, Aug 7, 2010 at 8:36:02 AM
Both the Right and Left should be outraged... by Jack Lohman on Saturday, Aug 7, 2010 at 9:24:15 AM
corrected link by Jack Lohman on Saturday, Aug 7, 2010 at 9:41:37 AM
One more way the Repugs are wrecking the economy by Richard Clark on Saturday, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:33:33 AM
Can we say partisean hack by Bob Frapples on Saturday, Aug 7, 2010 at 2:09:19 PM
Is it Drugs? by Michael Olympia on Sunday, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:13:49 AM
...proof that the Democrats and Republicans are corporatists by Jill Herendeen on Saturday, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:06:03 PM
"Will it work?" Of course it will. by Jill Herendeen on Saturday, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:10:50 PM
Yea but... by Jack Lohman on Saturday, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:19:22 PM
The people who own the corporations and the pols also own by Jill Herendeen on Sunday, Aug 8, 2010 at 8:02:22 AM
Will it work? by Ralph Dratman on Saturday, Aug 7, 2010 at 2:03:46 PM
Economy/Congress by David McKeever on Saturday, Aug 7, 2010 at 3:51:33 PM
Of course... by Jack Lohman on Sunday, Aug 8, 2010 at 8:15:08 AM
Economist Dean Baker comments: by Richard Clark on Sunday, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:33:11 AM
Guys, it is what it is... unless... by Jack Lohman on Sunday, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:56:43 AM
Ralph Nader on what collapsed the US economy by Richard Clark on Sunday, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:05:15 PM
Your article and explanations are great by BFalcon on Saturday, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:24:12 PM
Yes, all we need is more consumer spending, but . . by Richard Clark on Saturday, Aug 14, 2010 at 1:56:20 PM
Sure right by BFalcon on Saturday, Aug 14, 2010 at 4:36:38 PM
Totally agree bout returning the troops & letting them spend by Richard Clark on Saturday, Aug 14, 2010 at 6:26:00 PM
let the troops spend what by Laura Roberts on Saturday, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:37:21 PM
Get rid of contracters by Laura Roberts on Saturday, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:49:54 PM
How about colonels? by BFalcon on Saturday, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:47:15 PM
The money spent by Laura Roberts on Saturday, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:41:29 PM
Military staffing needs cannot be met... by John Sanchez Jr. on Saturday, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:33:26 PM
If our wars were truly defending our country and moral by BFalcon on Sunday, Aug 15, 2010 at 8:48:58 AM
military contractors by John Shriver on Sunday, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:35:26 AM
War by Debbie S on Sunday, Aug 15, 2010 at 12:03:05 AM
I support reducing the use of contract work by BFalcon on Sunday, Aug 15, 2010 at 8:39:09 AM
Construction Batallion by John Shriver on Sunday, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:25:30 AM
The Purpose Behind Engineered Economic Collapse in America by Richard Clark on Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:45:32 AM