Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Republican Right Poisons Well of Patriotism

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to None 5/3/10

In the manner of lacing well water with poison, the Republican right has sought to use patriotism as a deadly sword against progressive Democrats.

The propaganda maneuver is based on a simple principle. Only the Republican right can define patriotism. As a result, the most reactionary Republicans engaging in the most odious conduct, including unconstitutional acts of war and corruption, are deemed patriotic.

Those attacking such individuals and their actions are ipso facto deemed unpatriotic and of engaging in conduct that "gives aid and comfort to the enemy."

Many cite the mid-twentieth century conduct of Richard Nixon and Joseph McCarthy as the opening salvo in the strategy to paint progressives unpatriotic, but the effort was launched when President Franklin Delano Roosevelt developed a coalition of union and middle class support based on strong federal action to counteract the tragedy and suffering incurred during the Great Depression.

A reactionary big business coalition called the American Liberty League strove so hard to bring FDR down that a Fascist coup was initiated that was brought down through the valiant effort of one of America's unsung heroes, General Smedley Butler.

One of the leading legal minds of the thirties was Thurman Arnold, who served in the Roosevelt Administration Justice Department as an assistant attorney general. He was later nominated by Roosevelt and confirmed as an associate judge of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. He also served as a law professor at Yale.

Arnold is now best known for his thought provoking book "The Folklore of Capitalism." The book's thesis that was brilliantly elucidated was the central myth perpetuated by right wing propagandists of the American Liberty League.

This myth continues to be perpetrated. It lay at the central core of the Reagan and Bush II administrations as well as the current Tea Party movement. Its underlying belief is that what business does is essentially good and that actions by government in the economic and interrelated regulatory spheres are fundamentally bad and frequently un-American.

There is one exception to this rule. Unsurprisingly, the military sphere not only draws a free pass but, contrary to the pernicious regulators of our economy and legislators of social welfare legislation, who are suspect if not outright disloyal, advocates of high-powered Pentagon spending as well as advocates of military action are deemed patriotic heroes.

A classic example of this propaganda rule carried to its zenith was Richard Nixon, who was elected initially to Congress and later to the Senate through impugning the patriotism of his Democratic opponents, when he faced opposition from peace advocates seeking to end an increasingly unpopular Vietnam War.

Nixon and his propaganda agents sought to demonize his opposition. He proclaimed himself to be the spokesperson for the "Silent Majority" and let it be known that what he called "a small but vociferous" minority opposed his plan to achieve "peace with honor" in Vietnam.

The words "peace with honor" were repeated as a mantra. In the 1972 re-election campaign, when funding corruption that was exposed in the Watergate investigation gave him an overwhelming funding advantage over Democratic nominee George S. McGovern, President Nixon put some of his money to work in an interesting as well as highly devious manner.

Individuals were paid to appear at Nixon rallies dressed shabbily and shouting angry taunts. This tactic achieved a memorable pinnacle at one Southern California airport rally late in the campaign.

On one side stood grubby looking, snarling, seemingly anti-Nixon demonstrators. On the other side stood the kind of Americans that appeared to come out of a Frank Capra movie, nicely dressed, innocent appearing, who held Nixon banners.

It was a well paid for presentation and star performer Nixon relished his opportunity to stand before television cameras and make his point to Americans as the campaign wound toward its conclusion.

He pointed toward the angry looking, strident supposed Nixon demonstrators and exclaimed with a knowing smile, "They're against me!" After that he pointed toward the well dressed pro-Nixon enthusiasts and exclaimed, "They're for me!"

Next Page  1  |  2


Began in the journalism field in hometown of Los Angeles. Started as Sports Editor and Movie Writer at Inglewood Daily News chain after working in sportswriting of high school events at the Los Angeles Examiner.

Received a bachelor's in (more...)
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Koch Brothers Own Scott Walker

The Casey Anthony Photo that Dominates the Trial

Reagan, Deregulation and the Slippery Road to Poisoned Assets

When the CIA Overthrew Iran for British Petroleum

Did 12 Heads of Cabbage Decide the Casey Anthony Trial?

Fox News and the Dumbing Down of America


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

is it also the party of Nixon? And Hoover? And--da... by Margaret Bassett on Monday, May 3, 2010 at 8:44:16 AM
seems to have been totally abandoned in Republican... by Bill Hare on Monday, May 3, 2010 at 11:35:04 AM
is what the Republican right defines it to be. If ... by Bill Hare on Monday, May 3, 2010 at 11:36:31 AM
The Repubs may have taken the lead in the last few... by Richard Pietrasz on Tuesday, May 4, 2010 at 1:24:05 AM
this has been true. I was not referring so much t... by Bill Hare on Tuesday, May 4, 2010 at 1:37:33 AM