Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ;
Add to My Group
September 26, 2008 at 23:12:08

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 9/26/08:
The Republican Guard?

by Jayne Lyn Stahl     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com


Tell A Friend

In an election cycle which might well make the Guinness Book of World Records for gaffes, evidence of yet more confusion surfaces from the mouth of candidate McCain who says that we must go after the "Republican Guard of Iran."

Perhaps Sen. McCain was thinking of his own party, when he said that, and not the Iranian "Revolutionary Guard" that allegedly causes an egregious, and growing, threat.
As you recall, the Republican Guard was an elite group of Iraqi ground forces that was dissolved in 2003 which functioned principally to guard Saddam Hussein. Oh, well, Iraq--Iran; same difference.   

McCain got his Reagan reference right, during the debate, though. The gipper's famous slogan "Trust, but verify" was a timely reference indeed given McCain's penchant for chastising Obama over his openness with respect to making public any intention to take some kind of military action in Pakistan.    For the McCain camp, covert action only need apply. Presidents think, and strategize about, but never discuss with taxpayers what military roller coasters they intend to embark on. Let the taxpayer pick up the tab, to the tune of $10 billion a month in Iraq, as Obama repeatedly reminded McCain tonight and, all the while, let the unitary president keep his mouth shut.

Rest assured, if John McCain becomes the next commander-in-chief of our military, we may expect the same news blackouts witnessed in Grenada, and Libya. And, if Sarah Palin, becomes his second in command, we can expect to see the same defiance of congressional subpoenas, the same claims of executive privilege, campaign of secrecy, and the same suppression of the press. If the next occupiers of the executive branch are McCain/Palin, we may also expect to see the State of the Union Address with photos only, and no sound.


With President Obama, we may expect to hear plenty of sound, some of which we may not like, of course, but he will be one president who knows how to talk.

And, when it comes to the vision behind the talk, think about this: while McCain speaks about increasing the use of nuclear energy, Obama's focus, when it comes to things nuclear, is on nuclear nonproliferation, with the recognition that nonproliferation is as much a necessity to the survival of the planet as an effective energy plan.

Think about this: while McCain said that he will cut back on governmental programs and services with the exception of defense spending, and aid to veterans, remember that, on Memorial Day, John McCain openly opposed Virginia Senator Jim Webb's G.I. bill that will increase benefits to service members who return from Iraq and Afghanistan. McCain used the lame argument that the bill would "encourage people to choose to become noncommissioned officers," and would thereby "hurt the military and our country." (WaPo)

When Obama disagreed with McCain's position on Webb's bill, McCain shot back by challenging Obama's experience, and knowledge.

Well, when considering things like knowledge, judgment, and experience, one can only hope that the next President of the United States will recognize the difference between a group that guarded a downed leader during a military coup, and a group with a similar name in a neighboring country.

When considering things like knowledge, and experience, one can only hope that those of us who are old enough to remember what it was like to hide under a desk during an air raid drill will also remember the 1950's mindset that brought us not only the Cold War, but the deep intellectual freeze known simply as McCarthyism, and the mindset of conformity at the expense of creativity, faux nationalism; a mindset that forced women into back alley butcher shops for abortions.

We're glad Sen. McCain sees three letters on Putin's forehead: "KGB" because maybe he will soon recognize that George H.W. Bush, and Dick Cheney have three letters on their forehead, too: "CIA," and that the FBI, under George W. Bush, has expanded its powers to include unwarranted surveillance on ordinary American citizens under this foolishness that goes by the name of the USA Patriot Act powers that will soon be expanded thanks to the efforts of Attorney General Michael Mukasey. This new plan to increase FBI powers such that agents, and informants, may hide their identity while conducting so-called "pretext" interviews while pursuing national security risks. (WaPo)

Hiding one's identity is, after all, not a whole lot different than the kind of hiding from plain view we've seen in the destruction of millions of White House e-mails, and the subsequent attempt of the vice president to secede from the executive branch to avoid accountability. Don't let anyone try to convince you otherwise: Islamofascism isn't theonly kind of fascism we need to worry about now.

When he spoke about Russia, during tonight's debate, McCain was prescient in demanding that those who want to return to Russia to its empire days must deliver "a country that respects international boundaries, and the norms of international behavior," as he asserts. The same must be true of the United States which, in recent years, has defiled international boundaries in the name of empire building, and defied international law, and the Geneva Conventions.

Senator Obama is right. The only leadership that can truly take us forward is one, as he contends, with the "foresight to anticipate problems." Anything less amounts to lip synching the failed policies of a presidency that confuses homeland security with destabilizing the Bill of Rights.

Yes, Sen. McCain is right about working to unseat the Republican Guard---not the one in Iraq, of course, which was dissolved five years ago, but the one that has insulated the President of the United States, and his cohorts, from accountability over the past eight years.  
Make no mistake, the radical right neo-conservative agenda being pushed by McCain-Palin reflects the position of maybe a third of Republicans.  Indeed, McCain-Palin is what happens when Republicans let their guard down proving only that the war on terror begins at home. 

 

http://ladyjaynestahl.blogspot.com

Widely published, poet, playwright, essayist, and screenwriter; member of PEN American Center, and PEN USA. Jayne Lyn Stahl is a Huffington Post blogger.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Republican GOP"
The Republican Party: An Illustrated History of the Gop
by Adam I. P. Smith

$29.98
Lowest New Price $7.71

Number of pages: 368
Publisher: Thunder Bay Press (CA)

GOP devastation. (Republican Party of Arkansas) (Editor's Notes) (Column): An article from: Arkansas Business
by Jeff Hankins

$5.95

Number of pages: 3
Publisher: Journal Publishing, Inc.

GOP rules Georgia: Republicans control the state Capitol for the first time in 134 years.(Republican Party): An article from: State Legislatures
by Jim Tharpe

$5.95

Number of pages: 10
Publisher: Thomson Gale

Kristol ball: William Kristol looks at the future of the GOP. (chairman of the Project for the Republican Future) (Interview): An article from: Policy Review
by Adam Meyerson

$5.95

Number of pages: 14
Publisher: Hoover Institution Press

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments


Obama wins by not losing ...

As someone who is more interested in policy than personality, I found the performance of both candidates disappointing. In broad terms, the occasion, if not the debate per se, probably served Obama rather more than McCain. Behind by more than a margion of error in the polls, having declared his unwillingness to debate this side of a deal on the bailout of Wall Street and having been sent away by Republicans who could think of no way to help him without looking stupid and dragged back to the debate by the fact that most thought he had to be there, McCain needed at least to win clearly. Instead, he lost by not winning and Obama won by not losing.

McCain played to save on the economy, by muddying the waters and Obama abetted him, declining to challenge him on his technical insights into Glass Steagall or Gramm_Leach_Bliley or on counterparty risk or anything else. Obama, one suspects, thinks it risky to appear too clever or too much like a beltway insider to the good voters of Kentucky or West Virginia. He's ahead, so the upside for him was simply not there. Obama knows that McCain's endorsement of the bailout will hurt McCain's campaign more than his. 

The exchanges on foreign policy were much the same, with roles reversed, with Obama defending and McCain attacking. While Obama looked a little more at ease, and 'presidential' (which will probably help him with those who couldn't see him this way) neither candidate really showed a  grasp of the issues that would exceed those of a reasonably enthusiastic college freshman. McCain's gaffe on the "Republican Guard" went unchallenged by Obama and indeed, IIRC, Obama repeated it. MCain said that Obama was confusing tactics and strategy and then proceeded to use the terms interchangeably, and again went unchallenged. McCain, referring to Obama's posture on taking out Bin Laden in Pakistan,  said that there were "some things you just don't say" and then went on to say that when he looked into Putin's eyes he saw three letters: KGB.  Obama could have pointed out that this was indeed something one just didn't say -- given that it was already public knowledge and one way or another, any viable strategy demanded involvement of the Russians in a common effort to restrain nuclear proliferation, but he didn't. He could have pointed out that anyone who understood the difference between tactics and strategy would understand the strategic implications of taking out Iran's enemies on both frontiers in quick succession, but he didn't. He might have noted that the source of the unhelpful conduct by successive Pakistani governments was the same as the source of their helpful conduct during the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan -- the desire to preserve a strategic balance of power in the region viz a viz Russia and India. Obama might have pointed out that it was under McCain's hero, Ronald Reagan, that the ISI, via Reagan's protege, General Zia, achieved the most spectacular growth in its influence over both Pakistan and Afghanistan, and that this lack of strategic insight was what ensured a nuclear armed power fell under the control of a dictator sympathetic to Islamists, and how it came to be that Mushharraf reached the point of explicitly threatening to use them against India. It's why the US-funded ISI had people fighting alongside the Taliban even as US forces were backing the Northern Alliance forces, and why when the Taliban and Bin Laden were pinned down by US-allies in December 2001, the Pakistanis chose to abet their flight to Waziristan-- with the help of the US .  He might equally have pointed out that it was during Reagan's stewardship that Saddam acquired his documented WMD, precisely so that he could be a counterweight in the region to Iran and serve what were then considered the ends of US policy. If McCain really understood the difference between strategy and tactics, why did he not get this? Why was it that McCain saw Reagan as his hero again? How could McCain have justified any of this?

I don't know whether Obama had it within him to make these points, but he certainly failed to, which was most disappointing. 

Fran 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

by Fran Barlow (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 2 comments) on Saturday, Sep 27, 2008 at 3:02:02 AM

Recommend  (0+)

Too Bad Obama missed it

and then had to go and repeat it.

 

I think Mr. McCain made what some might call the classic Freudian slip.

He represents the American counterpart, The Republican Guard. Stuck in a socially conservative mindset that does way more harm than good.

Too bad Obama missed the opportunity to point this out.

Kim

A World Of Progress

by kgongre (19 articles, 0 quicklinks, 22 diaries, 30 comments) on Saturday, Sep 27, 2008 at 10:43:52 AM

Recommend  (0+)

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

South Africa Woolworth's Removes Aspartame by Stephen Fox

Rothschild's Federal Reserve Must Be Abolished by Allen L Roland

Photo Essay: Thoughts for the Fourth of July: Talking the Talk and Walking the Walk for Peace by Mac McKinney

Health Insurance Exec Whistleblower Wendell Potter Testifies Before Congress by Wendell Potter

Israeli Embassy Correspondence Concerning Spirit of Humanity Capture Clarifies Centuries of Conflict by Meryl Ann Butler

McKinney Relocated from Israeli Prison by Meryl Ann Butler

Dept. of State Spokesman Addresses McKinney's Capture by Meryl Ann Butler

Torture on the 4th of July by Lawrence Gist

Our Nation has a Great Deal to Learn from Phillip Butler about Morality, Law, and Torture by Lawrence Gist

Capricorn Full Moon Eclipse 2009 by Cathy Lynn Pagano

Go To Top 50 Most Popular

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum