Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 11   Well Said 7   Interesting 6   View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (29 comments)

The Primitive Conservative Psyche

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (14 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

The battles against the anti-democratic Right in Wisconsin, Ohio, Indiana, and elsewhere are being fought to prevent conservatives from remaking America in the image of their moral worldview.

Berkeley professor and author George Lakoff advises us to see more deeply into the psychology of this crisis. We need to understand, he writes, how the conservative belief in individual responsibility, to the exclusion of social responsibility, is based on the model of the strict-father family.

According to this model, the father's role in the family as Decider and moral authority is required to teach kids right from wrong. Conservatives claim that father's superior moral guidance is needed, along with physical punishment if necessary, so kids can develop the discipline to become morally responsible adults.

Why do conservatives think that father knows best? Psychoanalysis can provide insight.

According to psychoanalysis, the superego, also known as the inner critic or inner aggression, typically assumes an authoritarian, even a tyrannical, stance within our psyche. The superego is an aggressive drive that can function as an inner disciplinarian. However, it is usually negative and irrational. In less evolved individuals, the superego often decides what is right and wrong. But it makes this distinction for the sake of fulfilling its function, which is to exercise inner authority. It is not interested in, nor can it even distinguish, what is truly right or wrong.

In their psychological naiveté, however, conservatives interpret the oppressive, impersonal superego as a guiding voice of inner conscience.

When people are inwardly weak and unaware, the superego can have the run of their psyche and dominate their personality. Often, it is critical, ruthless, mocking, and unforgiving. It frequently overpowers what little sense of autonomy and personal authority many people possess.

Unwittingly, conservatives plant their soul in the impersonal authority of the superego. Hence, they are enamored of the power of the impersonal, as evidenced by their emotional alignment with corporations, the market, and the military. These three impersonal forces impose their values and authority without interference from citizens, as when the alleged self-regulating "invisible hand" of the marketplace destroys the environment.

Conservatives distrust government because it is personal, not impersonal. Government is the voice and protector of the people. But the people are not supposed to have a voice. Only some "higher" impersonal law or representative of that law (father figure) is allowed to decide the right approach to life's big issues. Just as children of conservatives must submit passively to the father, we adults are not supposed to have a mind of our own. We are not expected to grow in human consciousness.

Ideally, democratic governments express human consciousness at its best. This is the wise guiding authority that represents and protects us. But human consciousness is a discredited term in the conservative lexicon. That's because on an inner level, the consciousness of rigid conservatives is frozen in place. Global warming can't defrost it because "higher" authority hasn't factored in that game-changing scenario. In addition, the superego, the conservative mind's Decider, is hostile to our progress and completely indifferent to our suffering and self-defeat.

Hence, the superego has no capacity for empathy. Yet empathy is a quality of higher consciousness, as well as the basis of American democracy. Empathy is built into the principle of one person, one vote. When each person's vote counts, each person is respected and valued. Democracy is an evolved system that practices equality and justice. Democracy is supportive of each person being strong and happy, and it's not threatened when labor collectives possess bargaining rights. When it comes to power, the more the merrier.

Conservatives believe the government should not provide health care, environmental protection, and other forms of public service. That gives too much respect and power to everybody. They rationalize their lack of empathy by claiming that the poor deserve their poverty because they are responsible for their own failings. But the poor haven't necessarily failed. Perhaps they're doing well with the poor cards they were dealt. We're the lesser ones if our hearts are closed. So we have no business being judgmental. But the superego's specialty is being judgmental.

Conservatives' mental gymnastics for disrespecting the poor enable them to practice guilt-free ruthlessness while feeling morally superior, which is precisely the stance adopted by the superego. The superego clings to its power like a dictator as it tries to keep down human consciousness. Meanwhile, the conservative embrace of individualism is derived from the righteousness and arrogance of the superego as a power onto itself.

The conservative mentality rests on this primitive aspect of human nature. How tragic for America and the world if it were to prevail!

Self-knowledge is power, and knowledge of the oppressor's inner corruption is power to the people.

 

http://www.WhyWeSuffer.com

Peter Michaelson is an author, blogger, and psychotherapist in Ann Arbor, MI. He believes that better understanding of depth psychology reduces the fear, passivity, and denial of citizens, making us more capable of maintaining and growing our (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
29 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Another thought by Peter Michaelson on Friday, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:54:34 AM
I will take another angle by BFalcon on Saturday, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:52:23 PM
Another blanket statement by Joe L on Saturday, Feb 26, 2011 at 9:56:38 PM
Excuse me, but by BFalcon on Sunday, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:27:45 AM
Most are sucked in by the tactics used to divide and by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Friday, Feb 25, 2011 at 5:46:14 PM
Of course, people need to quit falling for the claim that by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Friday, Feb 25, 2011 at 5:54:57 PM
Reminds me of a diary I wrote some time back: by Daniel Geery on Friday, Feb 25, 2011 at 6:41:04 PM
Tweet: The Primitive Conservative Psyche: http://bit.ly/gKDStC by Chad Chase on Friday, Feb 25, 2011 at 7:18:29 PM
The Punitive Parent Model by Lee Cash on Saturday, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:55:33 AM
Punitive Parent by Peter Michaelson on Saturday, Feb 26, 2011 at 8:43:01 AM
The Punitive Parent Model and matriarchial possibilities. by Lee Cash on Sunday, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:05:23 AM
Primitive Conservatie Psyche by Joe L on Saturday, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:05:03 AM
Lots to think about by Peter Michaelson on Saturday, Feb 26, 2011 at 8:52:29 AM
Lots to think about. by Joe L on Saturday, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:36:33 PM
More to charity? by Gary Williams on Sunday, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:06:10 AM
More to charity? by Joe L on Monday, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:20:42 AM
The Adolescent Liberal Psyche by Miriam Callaghan on Saturday, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:30:28 AM
I agree, but will most folks appreciate this article? by Ron Morris on Saturday, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:38:01 PM
Good article? by Joe L on Saturday, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:50:13 PM
You read what you wanted to read by Ron Morris on Sunday, Feb 27, 2011 at 2:55:43 AM
You're reply is confusing. by Joe L on Sunday, Feb 27, 2011 at 8:47:38 PM
Blacks? by Gary Williams on Sunday, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:20:02 AM
Blacks by Joe L on Sunday, Feb 27, 2011 at 8:53:49 PM
Projection by Gary Williams on Monday, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:29:25 AM
Projection? by Joe L on Wednesday, Mar 2, 2011 at 1:06:06 AM
Not so sure of your analysis. by James OShanahan on Saturday, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:34:44 PM
Blanket Statements? by Gary Williams on Sunday, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:01:51 AM
Blanket statements redux by Joe L on Monday, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:50:50 AM
Blanket statements once again by Joe L on Thursday, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:43:10 PM