Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   11 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Need to Hold the GOP Accountable

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H1 5/5/09

Become a Fan
  (53 fans)
- Advertisement -

Perhaps it was the image of Jeb Bush expounding on the future of the Republican Party or Condoleezza Rice channeling her inner Richard Nixon with the imperial logic that "by definition, if it was authorized by the President, it did not violate our obligations under the Convention Against Torture."-

But what is increasingly clear is that the modern Republican Party "" with its unwillingness to face up to its responsibility for many of today's calamities and the crimes of its leaders "" has become a clear and present danger to the founding principles of the United States, and to the nation's security.

The issue is not "rebranding"- "" as the mainstream news media endlessly says "" but accountability. The concern should be more about the Republican past than its future or, put differently, whether the GOP deserves a future considering what it has done in the recent past.

Yes, I know that former Secretary of State Rice later clarified her remarks to assure us that she wasn't echoing Nixon's famous claim that "when the President does it, that means it is not illegal."- But the truth is that Nixon's assertion of above-the-law presidential powers was at the core of George W. Bush's unbridled view of executive authority for eight years.

Rice wasn't just parroting Nixon, but the views of her deeply admired leader, Bush. According to the Bush administration's recently released secret legal memos, Bush was a power onto himself with the authority to ignore all laws and all meaningful constitutional rights of citizens.

For instance, in an Oct. 23, 2001, memo, Deputy Assistant Attorney General John Yoo declared that Bush could order spying on and military attacks against U.S. domestic targets at his own discretion as Commander in Chief.

- Advertisement -

Yoo added, almost in passing, that the President also could abrogate the rights of free speech and a free press.

"The current campaign against terrorism may require even broader exercises of federal power domestically," Yoo said.

Another Yoo memo, dated June 27, 2002, essentially voided the Sixth Amendment's right of a trial by jury, the ancient protections of habeas corpus, and a federal law guaranteeing Americans public trials. In the memo, Yoo asserted that Bush had the power to declare American citizens "enemy combatants"- and detain them indefinitely.

So, while it may be true that Bush's lawyers put themselves through legal contortions in July and August of 2002 to explain why the near-drowning of waterboarding and other brutal tactics weren't torture, the theories were already in place for Bush to do whatever he wanted, regardless of traditional readings of federal law and the U.S. Constitution.

One must view Rice's comments last week at Stanford University about Bush's power "by definition"- to declare certain actions not "torture"- in the context of Bush's regal view of his "plenary"- "" or total "" powers as Commander in Chief.
- Advertisement -

Bush even believed that he could change reality simply through assertion. My favorite example was in July 2003 when Bush began justifying his invasion of Iraq by saying "we gave [Saddam Hussein] a chance to allow the [United Nations] inspectors in, and he wouldn't let them in. And, therefore, after a reasonable request, we decided to remove him from power."-

Bush would repeat this lie over and over for the next five years, but the reality was that Hussein had let the U.N. inspectors into Iraq in fall 2002 to search wherever they wished for WMD and that Bush forced the inspectors out in March 2003 to make way for the invasion. Despite these well-known facts, the Washington press corps never challenged Bush on his lie.

In other words, Rice's "by definition"- remark wasn't made in a vacuum. Her Nixon-like phrasing reflected the Bush concept of the imperial presidency, which had evolved into Republican orthodoxy since the days of Nixon.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at It's also available at

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The CIA/Likud Sinking of Jimmy Carter

What Did US Spy Satellites See in Ukraine?

Ron Paul's Appalling World View

Ronald Reagan: Worst President Ever?

The Disappearance of Keith Olbermann

A Perjurer on the US Supreme Court


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 people are discussing this page, with 11 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I agree with this article.  For reasons obvious t... by Margaret Bassett on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 9:57:23 PM
why Americans are so in love with their guns. It&#... by Archie on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 10:22:05 PM
Fantastic piece of writing! (Would it that I could... by Jeffrey Rock on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 at 12:44:04 AM
Between the wings we get to the heart of the matte... by Nemo on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 at 11:48:41 AM
How about holding the pro-war, corporate plutocrac... by Michael Cavlan on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 at 11:49:58 AM
I agree that ALL those who aided and abetted the l... by Jeffrey Rock on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 at 7:52:06 PM
I'm doubtful we'll ever hold the Republica... by Perry Logan on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 at 1:08:03 PM
be held accountable for anything is that the Democ... by Richard Mynick on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 at 3:14:55 PM
The parties are different? Oh yeah, one holds the... by Jeffrey Rock on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 at 8:18:04 PM
Here at OpedNews we have arguably one of the more ... by Bob Tracey on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 at 1:51:11 PM
"It weakens the left""It weakens th... by Mark Watterson on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 at 2:28:14 PM


Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2015, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum