Refresh  
Share on Google Plus
  3
Share on Twitter
  14
Share on Facebook
  50
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  1
68 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   9 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Mystery of a Ukrainian Army "Defector"

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 7/22/14

opednews.com

Cross-posted from Consortium News

James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence.
James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence.
(image by
Consortium News)

As the U.S. government seeks to build its case blaming eastern Ukrainian rebels and Russia for the shoot-down of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, the evidence seems to be getting twisted to fit the preordained conclusion, including a curious explanation for why the troops suspected of firing the fateful missile may have been wearing Ukrainian army uniforms.

On Tuesday, mainstream journalists, including for the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post, were given a briefing about the U.S. intelligence information that supposedly points the finger of blame at the rebels and Russia. While much of this circumstantial case was derived from postings on "social media," the briefings also addressed the key issue of who fired the Buk anti-aircraft missile that is believed to have downed the airliner killing all 298 people onboard.

After last Thursday's shoot-down, I was told that U.S. intelligence analysts were examining satellite imagery that showed the crew manning the suspected missile battery wearing what looked like Ukrainian army uniforms, but my source said the analysts were still struggling with whether that essentially destroyed the U.S. government's case blaming the rebels.

The Los Angeles Times article on Tuesday's briefing seemed to address the same information this way: "U.S. intelligence agencies have so far been unable to determine the nationalities or identities of the crew that launched the missile. U.S. officials said it was possible the SA-11 [anti-aircraft missile] was launched by a defector from the Ukrainian military who was trained to use similar missile systems."

That statement about a possible "defector" might explain why some analysts thought they saw soldiers in Ukrainian army uniforms tending to the missile battery in eastern Ukraine. But there is another obvious explanation that the U.S. intelligence community seems unwilling to accept: that the missile may have been launched by someone working for the Ukrainian military.

In other words, we may be seeing another case of the U.S. government "fixing the intelligence" around a desired policy outcome, as occurred in the run-up to war with Iraq.

The Los Angeles Times also reported: "U.S. officials have not released evidence proving that Russia's military played a direct role in the downing of the jet or in training separatists to use the SA-11 missile system. But they said Tuesday that the Russian military has been training Ukrainian separatists to operate antiaircraft batteries at a base in southwestern Russia."

Though that last charge also has lacked verifiable proof -- and could refer to training on less powerful anti-aircraft weapons like so-called Manpads -- the key question is whether the Russian government trained the rebels in handling a sophisticated anti-aircraft system, like the SA-11, and then was reckless enough to supply one or more of those missile batteries to the rebels -- knowing that these rockets could reach above 30,000 feet where passenger airlines travel.

The Russian government has denied doing anything that dangerous, if not crazy, and the eastern Ukrainian rebels also deny ever possessing such a missile battery. But the question that needs answering is: Are the Russians and the rebels lying?

That requires a serious and impartial investigation, but what the Obama administration and most of the mainstream U.S. news media have delivered so far is another example of "information warfare," assembling a case to make an adversary look bad regardless of the actual evidence -- and then marginalizing any dissents to the desired conclusion.

That was exactly the "group think" that led the United States into the disastrous invasion of Iraq -- and it appears that few if any lesson were learned.

[For more on this topic of prejudging who's to blame for the Malaysia Airlines tragedy, see Consortiumnews.com's "Kerry's Latest Reckless Rush to Judgment."]

 

http://www.consortiumnews.com

Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at secrecyandprivilege.com. It's also available at more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The CIA/Likud Sinking of Jimmy Carter

What Did US Spy Satellites See in Ukraine?

Ron Paul's Appalling World View

Ronald Reagan: Worst President Ever?

The Disappearance of Keith Olbermann

A Perjurer on the US Supreme Court

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

We do not need to know nationality or names of tho... by Ethan Hollow on Wednesday, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:26:25 AM
It totaly fit what I said. I said that rocket was ... by Ethan Hollow on Wednesday, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:02:51 PM
Very few in the US or anywhere else believe Washin... by Catherine McCoy on Wednesday, Jul 23, 2014 at 3:08:21 PM
It's so bad, with articles canceling each other's ... by Sandra Parson on Wednesday, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:09:37 PM
I wish what you say were true, but if you look at ... by Paul Easton on Thursday, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:29:14 PM
The best way to get to the truth about the downing... by George Masni on Wednesday, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:30:10 PM
Game is over. Australian prime minister Abbott tod... by Ethan Hollow on Wednesday, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:38:00 PM
Rebels admited today that they have BUK. Why? They... by Ethan Hollow on Wednesday, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:49:42 PM
This tragedy is Russia's fault click here... by Ethan Hollow on Wednesday, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:54:18 PM