OpEdNews Op Eds

The Mind of B37, Guilt and Acquittal

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Leslie Radford     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Funny 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 7/17/13

- Advertisement -

(Article changed on July 18, 2013 at 03:06)

If Juror B37 reflects the mindset of the jury, those five white and one black women, in their determination to acquit him, made a collective decision to dismiss the actions of George Zimmerman on February 26, 2012.  In that rainy, prematurely dark twilight, Zimmerman stalked Trayvon Martin, a young Black man walking to his father's home during an NBA All-Stars half-time, talking to a friend on his phone, carrying some snacks for the second half of the game. They scuffled, and Zimmerman drew on Martin and killed him.  In acquitting him, the jury decided Trayvon was responsible for his own death.

In the United States, a 21-year-old Black man has a 29% chance of doing prison time, and nearly one in three between the ages of 20 and 29 will be incarcerated (Center for Children's Law and Policy).  The revelations of Juror B37 explain how that happens, and how Trayvon was added to the  list of Black murderers , this time of himself .



- Advertisement -
In an interview  with Anderson Cooper on CNN,  In an  interview   with Anderson Cooper on CNN, Juror B37 says race wasn't discussed during the deliberations.  Racism as a motivation wasn't worth a thought, although it was a thread throughout the trial.  She patronizingly wrote off the testimony of Rachel Jeantel when the question of race was raised: Juror B37 felt "very sorry" for her.  "I didn't think [Jeantel's testimony] was very credible, but I felt very sorry for her."   At the same time, she admits she didn't understand her "a lot of the time," and it seems that access to court transcripts didn't change that.  It would appear that Juror B27's own racism and arrogance blinded her to considering the state of Zimmerman's mind.

Juror B37 admits that "when [Zimmerman] was in the car, and he had called 911, he shouldn't have gotten out of that car."   She agrees that "George got in a little bit too deep, which he shouldn't have been there."  But none of that mattered when it came to casting her ballot. 

What did matter was what Trayvon was doing. "Anybody would think anybody walking down the road, stopping and turning and looking--if that's exactly what happened--is suspicious." Apparently even if the man looking back was looking at his stalker.  And it mattered to Juror B37 where Zimmerman's heart was. "In the right place," she said.  She speculated about his future and concluded she didn't think Zimmerman would do it again: "He's learned his lesson."  Zimmerman's heart was her criteria for judgment and she's sure he won't do it again, and that's enough.
- Advertisement -

That's not to say she didn't know what happened. While she sifted out anything that might have incriminated Zimmerman, she still couldn't deny who initiated the evening's events.   She told CNN, "I think the roles changed," admitting that Zimmerman had, for Juror B37, provoked the confrontation. Four other jurors have disavowed her statement, not allowing even that much of the night's events to enter into their deliberations.

Ultimately, what mattered were not the facts, the testimony, the circumstances, the events that led to the confrontation.  Juror B37's interview is awash in hesitations and speculative "I think's."  Her impressionistic painting of that awful night's events, her fantasies of facts not in evidence, her personal determinations of what facts counted, who was good and who was bad, ended in her vote to acquit.  She was looking, consciously or not, for a way to turn "Georgie" loose.  She found it by winnowing out all the circumstances before the first punch, and with no proof decided that Martin hit first.  In an fantastical display of channeling the dead, she declared "Trayvon decided that he wasn't going to let [Zimmerman] scare him and get the one-over, up on him, or something. And I think Trayvon got mad and attacked him."  Not what provoked the punch, not anything Zimmerman did, only what Trayvon did mattered.  To Juror B37's way of thinking, Trayvon Martin should have allowed Zimmerman to stalk him, intimidate him, threaten him.  Apparently the five other jurors agreed with her.  

That's how you get an acquittal and convict the victim, that's how Black men end up in prison, and that's how you avoid justice: ignore the racism, forget the context, dismiss the provocation, compare your assessment of the actors' "natures," and you end up with a shifty, violence-prone young Black man.  Forget who was left holding the gun.  It happens that way a lot.
"-

 

Funny 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Los Angeles.

It conjures up an asphalt web of insulated individuals occasionally Crashing into each other. It is that, it's designed to be that, but in the spaces between the asphalt and concrete, and sometimes on those hard spaces that (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

White Truth and Shame

Voting for GrassrootsKPFK: It Matters

(another, smaller) Stolen Election

The Mind of B37, Guilt and Acquittal

Farmers Fighting for South Central Again

When Goliath Wins: The Triumph of Redevelopment in Los Angeles