Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 17 (17 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   22 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Media Response to the Growing Influence of the 9 /11 Truth Movement

By Elizabeth Woodworth  Posted by MikeZimmer (about the submitter)     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 10   Well Said 6   Valuable 4  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 12/12/09

- Advertisement -
Reflections on a Recent Evaluation of Dr. David Ray Griffin
by Elizabeth Woodworth

Cross posted from http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16505 with permission of the author.

The cover story of the September 24, 2009, issue of The New Statesman, the venerable left-leaning British magazine, was entitled The 50 People who Matter Today.(1) Any such list, necessarily reflecting the bias and limited awareness of the editors, would surely contain choices that readers would find surprising.

That is true of this list which includes families as well as individuals. A good number of names are, to be sure, ones that would be contained in most such lists created by British, Canadian, or American political commentators, such as the Obamas, the Murdochs, Vladimir Putin, Osama bin Laden, Angela Merkel, Bill and Melinda Gates, Warren Buffett, Pope Benedict XVI, and Gordon Brown. But about half of the names reflected choices that I, and probably most other readers, found surprising. One of these choices, however, is beyond surprising - it is astounding.

I refer to the person in the 41st position: David Ray Griffin, a retired professor of philosophy of religion and theology who, in 2003, started writing and lecturing about 9/11, pointing out problems in the official account of the events of that day. By the time the New Statesman article appeared, he had published 8 books, 50 articles, and several DVDs. Because of both the quantity and quality of his work, he became widely regarded as the chief spokesperson of what came to be called the 9/11 Truth Movement. It was because of this role that the New Statesman included him in its list, calling him the top truther (the conspiracy theorist title went to Dan Brown, who was placed in the 50th slot).

In saying Griffin matters, however, the New Statesman was not praising him. Here is how the magazine explained its choice:

Conspiracy theories are everywhere, and they always have been. In recent years, one of the most pernicious global myths has been that the US government carried out, or at least colluded in, the 11 September 2001 attacks as a pretext forgoing to war. David Ray Griffin, a retired professor of religion, is the high priest of the truther' movement. His books on the subject have lent a sheen of respectability that appeals to people at the highest levels of government - from Michael Meacher MP to Anthony Van' Jones, who was recently forced to resign as Barack Obama's green jobs' adviser after it emerged that he had signed a 9/11 truth petition in 2004.

I wish to raise two questions about the New Statesman's treatment of Griffin. First, is its evaluation of him as one of the most important people in the world today simply absurd, as it certainly seems at first glance, or is there a perspective from which it makes sense? Second on what basis could the editors justify their claim that the 9/11 truth movement is promoting a myth and a pernicious one at that?
- Advertisement -


The Inclusion of Griffin in the List: Does It Make Sense?

Why would Griffin's role as top truther as the intellectual leader of the 9/11 truth movement - lead the magazine's editors to consider him one of the 50 people who matter today? Unlike a president, a prime minister, or a pope, he has no political clout; unlike a billionaire, he has no financial clout; and his book sales do not begin to rival those of Dan Brown. Indeed, his books do not even get reviewed in the press. The idea that he is one of the 50 people who matter most in the world today is, as he himself has said, absurd at least from most angles.

There is, however, one angle from which it does make sense: Given the enormity of the 9/11 attacks and of the policies, both foreign and domestic, that have been justified as responses to those attacks, a movement challenging the official story of the attacks certainly could, in principle, become so influential that its intellectual leader would be a person of consequence.

And the movement has, in fact, grown enormously in both size and credibility since 2004 and 2005, when Griffin published his first two books on the subject The New Pearl Harbor and The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions and began working, with colleague Peter Dale Scott, on an edited volume that was published in 2006 as 9/11 and the American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out.

Due in large part to these volumes - plus the national exposure Griffin received when his 2005 lecture at the University of Wisconsin in Madison was carried by C-SPAN - a small group of academics formed Scholars for 9/11 Truth, which led in turn to the formation of Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice, the leaders of which launched the Journal of 9/11 Studies in 2006.
- Advertisement -


The existence of these scholarly organizations stimulated the creation of three professional organizations: Veterans for 9/11 Truth, Pilots for 9/11 Truth, and the destined giant of the movement, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, which was formed after architect Richard Gage, a conservative Republican, heard an interview with Professor Griffin on his car radio that would change his life. In it, Griffin was describing the newly released oral testimonies from the dozens of New York firefighters a who had heard booming explosions in the Twin Towers.(2) After looking into the evidence for himself and concluding that the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings could not have resulted from anything other than explosives, Gage formed his organization of architects and engineers, which now has almost 1000 licensed members.

While these developments were occurring, translations were made of some of Griffin's books, beginning with The New Pearl Harbor, which was published in Italian, Chinese, Danish, Czech, French, Dutch, Japanese, and Arabic. Thanks in part to these translations, a worldwide movement is now calling for 9/11 truth.

Also, this movement, which at one time was discounted as crazy conspiracy theorists playing around on the Internet, has now become widely professionalized, with Griffin again a critical influence in his consultant role to the emerging organizations of journalists, lawyers, medical professionals, religious leaders, and political leaders.

One of those organizations, Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth, includes in its membership British MP Michael Meacher, who has, according to the New Statesman, succumbed to the sheen of respectability given to the truther' movement by Griffin's books. The New Statesman would presumably look equally askance at other members of this organization, including Senator Yukihisa Fujita, one of the leading members of the new ruling party of Japan, who made a nationally televised presentation questioning the official account or 9/11, and Ferdinando Imposimato, a former Italian senator and judge who presided over the trial of the assassination of President Aldo Moro and the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
17 people are discussing this page, with 22 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Articles like this keep the pressure on for the tr... by Robert Gormley on Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 8:09:45 AM
All the points you raise (and more) make it plain ... by Dick Thomson on Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 8:51:14 AM
When it becomes blatantly obvious that 9/11 was a... by Robert Gormley on Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 9:53:38 AM
Excellent Dick Thompson. I also believe that the p... by abe ramsay on Tuesday, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:13:32 PM
All well and good, but I also refer readers to my ... by thomas unger on Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:20:12 AM
Griffin is a good researcher but he doesn't realiz... by Brian Jenkins on Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:04:51 PM
It most certainly isn't "proof". To say that it is... by Maxwell on Tuesday, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:43:07 AM
I find it a bit ironic that David Ray Griffin can ... by PrMaine on Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:31:07 PM
My guess is that people don't get by without fashi... by Peter Duveen on Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 4:04:01 PM
Anyone who claims to know about conspiracy theorie... by Bill Cain on Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:24:36 PM
The notion arose from the Kennedy assasination and... by PrMaine on Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:34:42 PM
I think it is completely misleading to say that Dr... by Jack Flanders on Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:35:51 PM
As hard as the "debunkers" try, they really can't ... by Maxwell on Tuesday, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:32:46 AM
At this point, I consider all publications and "ne... by A. Scott Piraino on Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 6:55:00 PM
I am reminded here of the mirrors at a fun house, ... by Oh on Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 7:00:37 PM
I know that Jesse Ventura's TruTv program “Consp... by Steven G. Erickson on Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:16:13 PM
I remain highly skeptical that 9/11 Trutherism is ... by J. Edward Tremlett on Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:25:04 PM
We have just entertained Richard Gage AE911truth i... by remo on Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:44:19 PM
Previous to 911 there had been no airplane highjac... by Larry McCombs on Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:47:59 AM
To say that there were 4 hijackings is technically... by Natalie Oberman on Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:35:27 PM
in his column two days after 9-11.... by Peter Duveen on Wednesday, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:06:38 AM
...ignored. Truth is out there for everyone and an... by abe ramsay on Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:13:09 PM