Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Madness of Never-Ending Economic Growth

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Adnan Al-Daini     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 10/4/13

Author 55822
Become a Fan
  (9 fans)
- Advertisement -

Countries' economies are driven by an obsession, continuous growth in the country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP).   The absurdity of this becomes clear with a little bit of thought.   Never-ending growth that relies on extracting resources from a finite planet is, of course, a mathematical impossibility, but well before we reach that point, this obsession will render our planet uninhabitable.

If our concern is the well-being of our citizens, is GDP the appropriate indicator of that?   GDP is defined (Wikipedia) as "the market value of all officially recognized final goods and services produced within a country in a given period of time." This implies that a cleaning-up operation after an environmental disaster for example gives a boost to GDP.  

Dan O'Neill of the Centre for the Advancement of Steady State Economics (CASSE) makes the point that many bad things such as family breakdown, wars, and environmental disasters contribute to GDP, but good things, where no money is exchanged, do not, such as volunteering.  

Research shows that while in developing countries there is a strong correlation between GDP per capita and people's well-being, in developed countries, such as Western Europe and the US, such a correlation no longer applies. For example, in the US and UK GDP per capita has tripled since 1945, but perception of happiness amongst the population has since flat-lined.

In a previous article on OpEdNews, I attempted to explain the destructiveness and stupidity of our economic growth obsession with these words:

"If we insist that western economies must continue to grow year after year for poor people even to have the basics for life, and since we know that only little of the wealth created trickles down, then before too long we will end up devouring the whole planet. Of course, well before we reach that point, we will have degraded our environment to the point where life becomes unsustainable for all of us, rich and poor, and certainly for future generations."

- Advertisement -

So where do we go from here? Steady-State Economics present us with an alternative to continuous growth economics. Rob Dietz and Dan O'Neill in their book "Enough is Enough" define a steady-state economy thus:

"At its simplest, a steady-state economy is an economy that aims to maintain a stable level of resource consumption and a stable population. It's an economy in which material and energy use are kept within ecological limits, and in which the goal of increasing GDP is replaced by the goal of improving quality of life " It prioritizes well-being above consumption, and long-term health above short-term gains " It promises that the transformation of the economic system from growth to stability, from more to enough , would allow us to solve critical environmental problems while maintaining (or even improving) quality of life"

This is certainly a vision worth striving for.   Frankly, there is no alternative because the existing growth fetish is driving humanity to despair, polluting our environment, and benefiting a very small segment of society world-wide.

Dietz and O'Neill suggest that a business model needs to go beyond generating revenue and earning profit. Businesses need to work "within a framework that respects ecological limits and promotes human well-being."   They suggest the following:

"Three ways to align business practices with the goals of a steady-state economy are: (1) promote new business models that generate shared value, (2) create business structures that are less prone to growth, and (3) adopt new measures for success for business."

Our societies need a paradigm shift in what we value. We need to treat our environment and our planet with the respect that is essential for our survival as a species. We owe it to our children and grandchildren to alter the destructive path on which humanity is currently travelling.  

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Dr Adnan Al-Daini took early retirement in 2005 as a principal lecturer in Mechanical Engineering at a British University. His PhD in Mechanical Engineering is from Birmingham University, UK. He has published numerous applied scientific research (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Libyan revolution

The Pursuit of Happiness. America, live up to the ideals of your Declaration of Independence

The Power of the Media

The Obscenity of War and Military Spending in a World of Need and Suffering

Global Warming: Doing Nothing or Very Little Is Not an Option

Education -- Heading to Mediocrity for the Many