Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter
  6
Share on Facebook
  44
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  2
52 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
8 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The L.A. Times Whitewash of Clarence Thomas

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 7/6/11
Become a Fan
  (7 fans)

opednews.com

Sigh.

Did anyone read the puff piece David G. Savage wrote about Clarence Thomas for the L.A. Times last Saturday?  

Savage writes that what defines Thomas' career is his tendency to go solo on his opinions, "a tendency that was almost certainly reinforced by his bitter and ugly confirmation fight in the Senate..."  

Uh huh.  Opinions Thomas has written from the highest bench in our nation, opinions which Savage noted include prisoners having no constitutional right to be protected from beatings by guards and teenagers and students having no free-speech rights at all, stem from Anita Hill's allegations of sexual harassment, which were later proven to be more correct than false. 

What Savage neglected to say - at all - is that Thomas' ethics are once again in question, so much so that the very rules about how Supreme Court Justices may conduct themselves are now under scrutiny.  A bill called the "Supreme Court Transparency and Disclosure Act of 2011" (HR 862) is pending in the House of Representatives.  In addition, a movement to impeach Thomas is gaining steam.   You'd think an L.A. Times piece about Justice Thomas which was syndicated in many other papers nationwide would at least mention those facts.

It would be enlightening for readers to remember that Thomas neglected to disclose his wife Ginni's $680,000 income from the Heritage Foundation.  (That was reported in January by L.A. Times writer Kim Geiger.)  But how many connected those dots from reading the Savage piece?  I, for one, would like to see mention of all relevant facts in one story.


Clarence and Virginia Thomas by crookandliars.com


What's keenly interesting is that both a Google search and an internal site search of the L.A.Times reveals the paper has never reported on how Thomas' friend, Harlan Crow, gave Thomas' wife, Ginny, $500,000 to form a Tea Party group to oppose President Obama's healthcare reform law.  (An earlier piece co-written by Savage and Kathleen Hennessey does raise the topic, but does not cite the fact that Crow, a personal friend of Thomas, is the funder.)  Crow is also reported to have given millions to a pet museum project of Thomas, as well as use of his private jet.  Nor is it reported that Ginny engages in lobbying activities about healthcare issues without filing required disclosures.

These ethical lapses become all too relevant when it is understood that the Supreme Court is certain to decide the constitutionality of Obama's healthcare law.  David G. Savage does report that Thomas "is seen as a sure vote to strike down President Obama's healthcare law and its insurance mandate."  

So maybe you'd like to tell us "the rest of the story," David?
 

                                      originally reported at SueWilsonReports.com

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Support HR 862, the Supreme Court Transparency and Disclosure Act!

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://www.suewilsonreports.com/

Sue Wilson tells important stories which move politicians to act. The Emmy winning director of the media reform documentary "Broadcast Blues" and editor of SueWilsonReports.com, Sue recently founded the Media Action Center. Wilson was 1987's (more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Right Wing Hit Media 400: "Disabling Journalism to Destroy Progressive Thought"

Why We Occupy Clear Channel

Putting Talk Radio on Trial at the FCC

Rush Limbaugh: Not the Only One with First Amendment Rights

When Radio Lies, Our Culture Dies

Time to Occupy the FCC?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

First the New York Times, now the L.A. Times. ... by Sue Wilson on Wednesday, Jul 6, 2011 at 8:09:21 PM
I think its time to remind everyone,newspapers are... by kappie on Thursday, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:23:16 AM
I learned from some really good editors, it all co... by Sue Wilson on Thursday, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:09:12 PM
We need to follow the intent of our founding fathe... by macdon1 on Saturday, Jul 9, 2011 at 12:38:03 PM
Why risk it by straying into journalism?... by Jim Arnold on Thursday, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:50:12 PM
I contributed a modest sum of money to the Iraq Ve... by GLloyd Rowsey on Thursday, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:45:34 PM
Maybe it's because the Obit department needs to pr... by Sue Wilson on Thursday, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:05:41 PM
Clarence Thomas is a disgrace to the Supreme Court... by macdon1 on Saturday, Jul 9, 2011 at 12:30:02 PM