Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 4 (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   1 comment

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Know-Nothing Candidate -- An Analysis

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 8/11/12

Become a Fan
  (12 fans)

Part I -- The Know-Nothings, Then and Now

There is a universal phenomenon that I call natural localism. The majority of people, wherever they might live, are affected by this condition. It results in limited knowledge -- knowledge of what is local and ignorance (often breeding fear) of what is not local. Unless countered by positive education and tolerance, natural localism can result in aggressive behavior toward the unfamiliar.

In the year 1849, natural localism was institutionalized in a small nativist party in the United States called The American Party. It was basically an anti-immigrant affair. White men who were ignorant and fearful of outsiders came to see Catholic immigrants of all descriptions undermining the true character of the U.S. The party was powerful for a short time, particularly in the northeastern states, electing candidates to local office throughout the region.

Appropriately enough, adherents to the American Party came to be called "Know-Nothings." There were two reasons for this: On one hand, party members tended to be secretive about their political affiliations, giving their party a strong conspiratorial flavor.  When asked about the activities of the American Party they would reply, "I know nothing." On the other, they really did know almost nothing of the groups that exercised their passions. They thought all Catholics were under the complete command of the Pope, like religious zombies.

Ignorance was the hallmark of the "Know-Nothings" and, while they never did capture national power, they never went away. Today you can find their successors throughout the land, fixated on a wide range of issues:

-- There are Americans who really know nothing about Muslims but are sure they are a mortal threat to the country. They have replaced Catholics as the modern Know-Nothing's version of religious zombies.

-- There are some who know nothing about Mexicans and others from south of our border but are sure that anyone who speaks like they do is a threat.

--- There are some who know nothing about Iran, can not even locate it on a map, but are sure it is a threat and should be attacked.

Actually the list is nearly endless. And, given that Americans know so little about so much of what they have strong opinions about, it is inevitable that know-nothingness should contaminate the politics of the nation. For instance, the Republican Party plays the role of today's Know-Nothing party. Strong evidence for this conclusion comes from the circus that was the Republican presidential nominating campaign. Since almost all of the contenders for the nomination were self-congratulatory Know-Nothings, it is no surprise that the man who won that contest, Willard Mitt Romney, is one as well.

Part II -- The Know-Nothing Candidate

Romney affirmed himself as the standard bearer of America's modern Know-Nothing party during his recent trip to England, Israel and Poland. Here is how it went:

-- He came close to being declared persona non grata in England by gratuitously questioning the adequacy of British security for the Olympic Games. All security issues had already been addressed. The British papers pilloried Romney for his comments.

-- In Israel, he made a speech before an audience of wealthy potential donors to his campaign (many of them flown in from the United States for the occasion).  He told them that the difference between Israel's economic achievement and that of the Palestinians was a function of a) superior Jewish culture and b) God's will.  Not one word about the Israeli occupation of Palestine.

This statement was so outrageous, so historically off the mark, that one might wonder if it was just a publicity stunt to win favor with a monied crowd. But that is doubtful. Romney had long ago aligned his views with his friend Israel's right-wing prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Netanyahu comes from a long line of fanatical Israelis who see the Palestinians as inherently inferior. And, there is the fact that Romney has publicly stated that his thinking about Israel and the Jews has been shaped by a book written by Don Senor (now a foreign policy adviser to the Romney campaign) titled Start-Up Nation -- The Story of Israel's Economic Miracle. This book suggests that Israel succeeded economically because of genetics: Jews are born smart and entrepreneurial.

Of course, this is just rubbish. Israel is a "donor state." That is, from the beginning of its modern history and to a great extent today, it continues to thrive because of a huge annual influx of foreign aid. Billions of dollars pour into Israel every year from the U.S. government, donations from elements of world Jewry and also from crazy Christian Zionists. Given the level of these handouts, any relatively stable nation with a highly educated citizenry could do what the Israelis are economically doing -- no Jewish genes required. Yet, just as the reality of occupation is absent from Romney's frame of reference, so is the largess that has sustained Israel's economic "miracle" for over 60 years.

If you would like to publicly challenge Romney or his campaign staff on any of this, the reply you can expect was set down during his brief stay in Poland. As reporters sought to ask questions, Mr. Romney's press assistant Rick Gorka replied, "kiss my ass." Mr. Gorka is a Know-Nothing too. His response has not been disavowed by the candidate.

Willard Mitt Romney knows about what has been local in his life. He knows how to be a particularly negative businessman, the kind who takes corporations apart and exports their jobs. He also appears to know how to make a lot of money and not pay taxes on it. As a politician he can glad-hand you in order to get a donation and play the chameleon so you are not sure what many of his positions are. He probably knows the other local things that most of us also know: how to balance a checkbook, drive a car, and stay clean, etc... Beyond this, however, it is a safe bet that he is a Know-Nothing. Worse yet, he is prone to fill his void of ignorance with magical thinking.  For instance, that declaration that Israeli success is not only based on cultural superiority, but is also a function of the "hand of Providence."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.tothepointanalyses.com

Lawrence Davidson is a history professor at West Chester University in Pennsylvania. He is the author of Foreign
Policy Inc.: Privatizing America's National Interest
; America's
Palestine: Popular and Offical Perceptions from Balfour to Israeli
Statehood
; and Islamic Fundamentalism. His academic work is focused on the history of American foreign relations with the Middle East. He also teaches courses in the history of science and modern European intellectual history.

His blog To The Point Analyses now has its own Facebook page. Along with the analyses, the Facebook page will also have reviews, pictures, and other analogous material.


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

More On Savage Israel -- An Analysis

Nationalism vs. Capitalism: Guess Which One Wins?

The Liar's Master Class -- An Analysis

Domestic Terrorism American Style -- An Analysis

The Mind of the Poor

A Zionist Worldview and the Slaughter in Gaza - An Analysis

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

It is the most basic elementary belief for Jews, ... by Jean Katz on Sunday, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:56:10 AM