Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
2 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
General News

The King Assassination and Pretense

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   News 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

opednews.com

The King Assassination and Pretense

"During the lifetime of great revolutionaries, the oppressing classes constantly hounded them, received their theories with the most savage malice, the most furious hatred and the most unscrupulous campaigns of lies and slander. After their death, attempts are made to convert them into harmless icons, to canonize them, so to say, and to hallow their names to a certain extent for the "consolation' of the oppressed classes and with the object of duping the latter, while at the same time robbing the revolutionary theory of its substance, blunting its revolutionary edge and vulgarizing it."

"   Vladimir Ilyich Lenin , 1917, The State and Revolution

Whatever one thinks of Lenin, those words describe perfectly events surrounding the life, death, and memorialization of Martin Luther King, Jr. What irony, this annual fanfare by a country that has given King a national holiday, an immense statue in Washington, DC, and has named countless schools and streets after him, all the while carefully avoiding facts surrounding his assassination. 

In 1999, there was a civil trial in Memphis, Tennessee, site of the assassination, that sifted through information that had become available in the 31 years following King's murder. The trial, Coretta Scott King et al. vs. Loyd Jowers et al., was a wrongful-death lawsuit. That Jowers was implicated in the murder rather than the patsy, James Earl Ray, pales beside the fact that the six black and six white jurors were unanimous in their determination that "governmental agencies" (specifically, the FBI and Army intelligence, as well as the Memphis Police Department) were involved in the conspiracy to kill King. A transcript of the trial is available at the King Center:    http://www.thekingcenter.org/civil-case-king-family-versus-jowers   .  Snippet from the transcript: THE COURT: In answer to the question did Loyd Jowers participate in a conspiracy to do harm to Dr. Martin Luther King, your answer is yes. Do you also find that others, including governmental agencies, were party to this conspiracy as alleged by the defendant?"""... THE JURY: Yes (in unison). 

Earlier, in 1976-78, a Subcommittee of the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) had been established to investigate King's murder. Subcommittee Chairperson, Walter Fauntroy, found his TV and phone were being tapped. CIA, FBI and military intelligence information was made unavailable and remains so. Although Fauntroy acknowledged that the Subcommittee had not been able to investigate the incident sufficiently, his inquiry simply ended with the official, but erroneous, conclusion that James Earl Ray had killed King. When it became known that Fauntroy was working on a book about his experience at HSCA, he became the target of a threatening Department of Justice investigation that induced him to terminate his book project and to refrain from further investigation of King's murder.  

As troubling as governmental complicity is the fact that mainstream journalists did not attend the trial. Theologian and activist James Douglass did attend the trial in its entirely, and his report, seen at this link, explains his experience, as well as his  interview of Walter Fauntroy . Moreover, the King family's attorney, William Pepper, published a book in 2003, "An Act of State: The Execution of Martin Luther King", that details material uncovered during the trial and that, like the trial itself, has been  shunned . There are also several speeches on YouTube (search "William Pepper mlk") in which Pepper presents assassination details along with a personal account of his relationship with King dating to the Vietnam War era. 

It would be difficult to cite a better example of the corrupt relationship between mainstream media and treacherous sectors of the US Government than the total disregard by American journalists of what, it can be argued, was the de facto "Trial of the 20th Century".  While trials involving celebrities are covered 24/7 by US media, not a paper, not a network, not PBS, covered it. And the blackout remains solidly in place, as no journalists will discuss it today. This fact alone reveals the nature of US journalism and the myth of its "independence/adversarial relationship with power". 

The whole story of King's death as presented by government and media is a lie, and it does not sit well that people who are supposed to think straight and to pursue truth accept it blindly. The way to honor King is to dispel the lies that have been created around his death. 

 

Bill Willers is emeritus professor of biology, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh now living in Middleton, WI. He is founder of Superior Wilderness Action Network (SWAN) and editor of Learning to Listen to the Land and Unmanaged Landscapes, both from (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

AN ATTACK FROM HARVARD LAW ON THE ESCALATING 9/11 TRUTH MOVEMENT

"Anybody's Son Will Do"

Increasing Threats To The 9/11 Truth Movement

Alan Simpson, Social Security, and the Welfare Barons of the Livestock Industry

9/11, ABC, the Washington Post, and Too Many Holes to Plug

CONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVES CAN CREATE A PROGRESSIVE PARTY: A PROPOSED LETTER

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Amy Goodman at Democracy Now! is the exception to ... by intotheabyss on Thursday, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:22:29 PM
Not really.  Your link was to her show which... by Bill Willers on Sunday, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:56:08 PM