Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
December 30, 2008 at 15:38:05

View Ratings | Rate It

The Israel-Gaza Strip Conflict: History, Mistakes, and Solutions

by Joe Bechtold     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

Tell A Friend

The History

I’m far from an expert on the history and foreign policy of the Middle East but have been doing a lot of research lately regarding what is going on with the most current conflict between Hamas and the Israel. I am going to chronicle the most recent events in the region, comment on them, and follow up with an idea on how to achieve peace in the region.

The Gaza Strip has its own democratically elected government. In 2006 they elected the group of Hamas to power. There was some struggle of power from the previous party to Hamas till Hamas through force took control in mid 2007. Since before Hamas and during Hamas’ time in power there have been rockets fired from the Gaza Strip into Israel. Hamas, as a political party has the annihilation of Israel as part of its platform.

During the last year and a half Israel has had an embargo on the Gaza Strip allowing in limited necessary supplies in reaction to Hamas taking power in the Gaza Strip. Then about 7 months ago they negotiated a ceasefire in which Hamas was to stop firing rockets at Israel and Israel was to ease restrictions on there embargo on Hamas. In the year prior to the cease fire approximately 12 rockets were fired from the Gaza Strip at Israel per a day. During the ceasefire approximately 2 rockets were fired daily from the Gaza Strip towards Israel. This is a reduction of over 80%, but is still not perfect. Israel however during this time did not ease their embargo of the Gaza Strip at all.

In November of 2008 the ceasefire ended and rockets were still being fired from the Gaza Strip into Israel. On December 26th, 2008 Israel began an air campaign targeting Hamas in the Gaza Strip. To date there have been over 360 casualties in the Gaza Strip. Some foreign aid to the region has been denied. Government buildings in the Gaza Strip have been targeted. I have come across two goals by the Israelis in regards to this conflict, first to stop the rockets being fired into Israel and two to remove Hamas from power.

What’s wrong with this picture?

The most glaring issue I see in this is that Israel has taken military action against a sovereign nation because it does not agree with it’s democratically elected leaders. Democracy should not be beholden to the will of foreigners, but only the governed. Israel has restricted and in many cases stopped other nations from being able to trade with the Gaza Strip. This is and has taken a toll on the civilian population in the area. The rights of the people of the Gaza Strip have been denied by the Israelis.

This is not to say the people of the Gaza Strip are completely innocent either. The embargo is justifiable due to the number of rocket attacks from the Gaza Strip to Israel. However this was not the reason the Israelis chose for the embargo. Regardless the embargo was successful in bringing about a ceasefire between the Gaza Strip and Israel. For a 6 month period of time the government of Hamas reduced its negative impact on Israel by 80% per the ceasefire. Israel however did not reduce the negative impact it’s embargo was having on the Gaza Strip. In this situation it seems as if Hamas has made an honest effort to live up to its end of the bargain (what government has complete control over the actions of its entire people anyway?) while Israel didn’t change their stance against Hamas since the embargo began. I do not understand how Israel can believe that by continuing their act of war against Hamas they expected complete compliance.

Sure it can be argued that Hamas did not meet it’s goal of the agreement and thus Israel should not have given up any ground to them. However, as a measure of good faith and cooperation if Israel had eased their embargo but not ended it as Hamas reduced the number of rocket attacks it could have built some trust between the two. Thus at the end of the agreement the two could have extended it with the intention of further reducing rocket attacks on Israel and reducing and eventually removing the embargo on the Gaza Strip.

So what ended up happening was Hamas and the people of the Gaza Strip saw that they were working towards their end of the ceasefire and Israel was not doing their half. Thus they fell into the only solution they know, violence. When the ceasefire ended rockets were again fired like before the ceasefire. Israel then responded with its current air strike against the Gaza Strip. As we can see, violence results in more violence.

So now we are where we are. The Israelis are pissed at Hamas for shooting rockets at them and Hamas is pissed with Israeli for bombing them. Resentment and anger is going to continue to build up between the two parties and make it harder and harder for them to come to an agreement. Any political capital that had been built up during the mildly successful ceasefire has now all but obliterated by Israel’s air strikes.

Where do we go from here?

First and foremost hostilities must immediately cease. Unless one nation completely annihilates the other this conflict won’t make things better, it will actually make them worse. Then as humanitarian groups and the UN coordinate peace efforts Israel must extend the olive branch to the people of the Gaza Strip by giving some sort of indirect aid to the region (money, supplies, etc.).

The next step will be for each group to recognize the other as a legitimate and sovereign nation. Once this is done a new ceasefire should be brokered. Israel must agree to immediately reduce the embargo on the Gaza Strip letting all supplies necessary for life through (food, clothing, energy) while Hamas must start by immediately reducing the number or rocket attacks directed towards Israel to numbers during the previous ceasefire (approximately 2 rockets a day). As Hamas continues to reduce the number or rocket attacks (the action) Israel will reduce its embargo (the reaction).

The average person in both countries will see that as the ceasefire progresses and both sides come closer to meeting their agreement that peace is much preferable to war. As they are the ones who are impacted the most by the conflict through death and destruction they will continue to call for further peace negotiations from their elected leaders. This will hopefully reduce if not eliminate conflict between Hamas and Israel.

 

Joe Bechtold graduated from Northeastern Illinois University in the summer of 2008 with a Bachelor's degree majoring in history and minoring in criminology. He is a member of the Illinois Air National Guard. Joe currently holds a position in (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Gaza Hamas History Israel"
The Case Against Israel's Enemies: Exposing Jimmy Carter and Others Who Stand in the Way of Peace
by Alan Dershowitz

$15.95
Lowest New Price $10.85

Number of pages: 304
Publisher: Wiley

Teach Yourself The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (Teach Yourself: General Reference)
by Stewart Ross

$12.95
Lowest New Price $2.80

Number of pages: 224
Publisher: McGraw-Hill

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments


The understandings of the Arabs are necessary to bring peace

The majority of the Arabs are the people do like wars always. They are not looking for peace because of the Islamic teaching and the culture they are brought up. They are making the World unstable because of their terrorist ideologies. The Arabs used to have only Saudi Arabia and part of the Yemen’s land. They are in positions of the land from Morocco to Iraq what else they want.

The Arab and Jewish people’s problem can be solved based on truth about the past.  When the Arab Imperialists are going to acknowledge the truth?  By admitting the crime they did commit against the humanity in the past. The Jewish people are in title of more land than what they have now because they are the original people from the region.

The Arab took the land of western Persian Gulf, Iraq, and half of Syria from our Iranian people just like few years ago Saddam Hussein took part of Kirkuk, Mousel, Daylia from our Kurdish in this modern ages. Now Noori Maliki the Iraqi PM want the land because he is clamming that the land belongs to his father from Basra/Iraq.

When they are going to think about peace and stop the war of land in the region.

by Jaff Sassani (19 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 138 comments) on Wednesday, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:44:21 PM

Recommend  (0+)

The Gaza people have the right to elect miiltant leaders...

...but is this moral or smart?

Israeli attacks are illegal, but it’s legal to continually amass arms with the intent of invading and conquering Israel?  Israel saw Hezbollah then Hamas do this and they are smart enough to know that if they don’t act before their enemies get too militarily powerful, Armageddon is coming. The US had long used this approach and is doing so now. Call it illegal war or whatever -- it’s preemptive self-preservation. It’s all incredibly sad, but that’s how humans act to preserve their lives. Israel will not allow another Holocaust.

Israel’s neighbors want to exterminate Israelis and take the land. What would you do if your neighboring town was amassing arms, firing rockets or just throwing rocks at you and intending to take your town? Would you treat the armed aggressors politely or take them to court about their bad behavior and arms buildup, assuming peace and justice would prevail? Do your children deserve to live with that crap?

The Palestinian’s rulers are militant terrorists who hide, militarize with no end in sight, and wage terror among civilian neighborhoods like yours; their leaders are not peaceful civilians. Why is it so hard to condemn militants and see their hostile intent and so easy to bash Israel for protecting her citizens from horrid threats? Look at what Hezbollah has done for the Lebanese people this year.  Hamas will do the same thing if allowed to amass arms.

The US is a Judeo-Christian country and will not allow Israel, the homeland of Christ, to be annihilated. Until there is a change of heart where Israel’s neighbors respect Judaism and Jews’ right to live in what is Israel, there will be no peaceful solution, no Palestinian state. Hate, religion and resentment fuels this whole mess.

Dave

by Davaru (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 45 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:15:12 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Reply: What would I do...

Would I just stand by as they shoot rockets at me?  Nope.  But are you surprised that they are shooting rockets when you are carrying out an act of war against you (embargo)?  Nope.  You wont get any where bullying them into doing what you want, you'll just piss them off more and make peace harder to come by.

 In regards to Islam taking over that entire region in the past so what?  If you know history you know that Greece took over that area before, then the Persians, then...  Humanity is full of conquest, what land people have now should remain the same.  There is no justification for expansion by anyone at this point.   Oh, and Christianity and Juadism have its share of a violent history too, so let's not only point our fingers at them.

Justifiable pre-emptive war?  Seriously?  Maybe I should kill anyone who has something against me, that way I could avoid any harm to me in the future... 

by Joe Bechtold (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 42 comments) on Wednesday, Dec 31, 2008 at 3:07:01 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Reply: Correction

When I said:

But are you surprised that they are shooting rockets when you are carrying out an act of war against you (embargo)?

I meant:

But are you surprised that they are shooting rockets when you are carrying out an act of war against them (embargo)? 

Apologies. 

by Joe Bechtold (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 42 comments) on Wednesday, Dec 31, 2008 at 3:09:54 PM

Recommend  (0+)

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

South Africa Woolworth's Removes Aspartame by Stephen Fox

Rothschild's Federal Reserve Must Be Abolished by Allen L Roland

Photo Essay: Thoughts for the Fourth of July: Talking the Talk and Walking the Walk for Peace by Mac McKinney

Health Insurance Exec Whistleblower Wendell Potter Testifies Before Congress by Wendell Potter

Tennessee's Law Allowing Guns in Bars Doesn't Go Far Enough by Grant Lawrence

Israeli Embassy Correspondence Concerning Spirit of Humanity Capture Clarifies Centuries of Conflict by Meryl Ann Butler

McKinney Relocated from Israeli Prison by Meryl Ann Butler

Dept. of State Spokesman Addresses McKinney's Capture by Meryl Ann Butler

Torture on the 4th of July by Lawrence Gist

Our Nation has a Great Deal to Learn from Phillip Butler about Morality, Law, and Torture by Lawrence Gist

Go To Top 50 Most Popular

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum