Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   15 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Historical Jesus and New Testament Rubbish: Part One: The Road to Golgotha

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 10/7/13

Become a Fan
  (13 fans)

(Article changed on October 7, 2013 at 23:56)

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/26564389@N08/9416210247/: CARP-AN003-0001-0002
CARP-AN003-0001-0002 by Greene Connections

A Review of Zealot, by Reza Aslan, (Random House, 2013) and Christian Beginnings, by Geza Vermes (Yale, 2013)

In his best-selling book Zealot, Professor Reza Aslan asserts that there are "only two hard historical facts about Jesus of Nazareth upon which we can confidently rely: the first is that Jesus was a Jew who led a popular Jewish movement in Palestine at the beginning of the first century C.E.; the second is that Rome crucified him for doing so." "Crucifixion was a punishment reserved almost exclusively for sedition."

(Even the two individuals allegedly crucified with Jesus were called lestai, "the most common Roman designation for an insurrectionist or rebel.")

Thus, given the paucity of reliable historical evidence about Jesus, the author of Zealot places him in the social, religious and political life of first-century Palestine and uses solid historical evidence from that period to expose the many errors contained in the New Testament.

He begins by demolishing the claims, made in the gospels of Luke at (2:1-21) and in Matthew at (2:1-9), that Jesus was born in Bethlehem. First, Luke's account of Quirinius' census is "factually inaccurate." Second, it is "preposterous" to believe "the entire Roman economy would periodically be placed on hold as every Roman subject was forced to uproot himself and his entire family in order to travel great distances to the place of his father's birth, and then wait there patiently, perhaps for months, for an official to take stock of his family and his possessions, which, in any case, he would have left behind in his place of residence."

Third, there is not "a shred of corroborating evidence" in any of the many chronicles or histories of the time," whether Jewish, Christian, or Roman, to support Matthew's claim that Jesus fled into Egypt in order to escape the massacre ordered by Herod of sons born in and around Bethlehem. Consequently, Professor Aslan concludes that Jesus was born in the "inconsequential and utterly forgettable" hamlet of Nazareth.

In Zealot, we are told that early first-century Nazareth had no roads, no school, no public buildings and no synagogue. Because approximately 97 percent of all early first-century Jews were illiterate, Jesus probably was illiterate. Thus, it follows that Luke wrote theologically inspired rubbish, both when he placed Jesus in a nonexistent synagogue in Nazareth and when he had him reading from the Isaiah scroll. See Luke 4:16-22.

Jesus probably spoke Aramaic and, perhaps, some Greek. Perhaps, he was a carpenter. Unfortunately, there's only one verse in the entire New Testament -- Mark 6:3 -- that claims Jesus was a tekton, an artisan in the building trades.

Like many other New Testament scholars, Professor Aslan believes the gospel of Mark (who probably resided in Rome, whoever he was) is the most reliable of the gospels, because it was written first. Nevertheless, it was written anonymously some 40 years after Jesus' death by a person whose "coarse, elementary Greek"betrays the author's limited education." But, if Mark 6:3 is accurate, "then as an artisan and a day laborer, Jesus would have belonged to the lowest class of peasants in first-century Palestine, just above the indigent, the beggar, and the slave. The Romans used the word tekton as slang for any uneducated or illiterate peasant, and Jesus was very likely both."

Consequently, "Peasants like Jesus would have had enormous difficulty communicating in Hebrew, even in colloquial form." Thus, Luke probably wrote theologically fanciful rubbish when he described twelve-year old Jesus standing in the Temple in Jerusalem and debating the Hebrew Scriptures with rabbis and scribes. (Luke 2:42-52)

According to the New Testament, Jesus had at least four brothers and an unknown number of sisters. If correct, such biblical claims pose immense problems for the Catholic doctrine of Mary's perpetual virginity. Nevertheless, Professor Aslan believes that "the tradition of the virgin birth was an early one, perhaps predating the first gospel, Mark," which fails to mention it. Matthew and Luke wrote about it, but only decades later.

Matthew's gospel, which probably was written in Damascus some 60 to 70 years after Jesus' crucifixion, contains theologically embellished rubbish intended to demonstrate how the life and death of Jesus fulfilled the prophecies of the Hebrew Scriptures. Two previously mentioned examples are: (1) Jesus was born in Bethlehem and (2) Jesus came out of Egypt.

Matthew also claimed that Jesus' birth fulfilled the prediction of the prophet Isaiah, who at 7:14 in the Septuagint (a Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures) proclaimed: "Behold a virgin shall conceive and bear a son," Apparently Matthew could not read Hebrew. For, had he mastered that language, he would have known that the Septuagint actually mangled Isaiah 7:14 by mistranslating the Hebrew word ('almah (which means young woman) into the Greek word parthenos (which means virgin). The Hebrew word for virgin, betulah, is nowhere to be found in Isaiah 7:14 of the Hebrew Scriptures.

Luke is equally unreliable. For example, when Luke quotes Jesus to say, "Thus it is written that the messiah would suffer and rise again on the third day," he probably put false words into Jesus' mouth in order to fulfill the law of Moses, the prophets and the psalms (Luke 42:44-46).

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

Walter C. Uhler is an independent scholar and freelance writer whose work has been published in numerous publications, including The Nation, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the Journal of Military History, the Moscow Times and the San (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Grand Jury Report: Part two of "What did Joe Paterno know and when did he know it?"

Three False Assertions by the Grand Jury turned the Press and Public against Joe Paterno and Penn State

New, Previously Suppressed Grand Jury Testimony and Joe Paterno: Part four of "What did Joe Paterno know and when...

What did Joe Paterno know and when did he know it? Part One

Incompetent Journalists at the Philadelphia Inquirer Slandered Joe Paterno

Hitting Penn State's Board of Trustees Where it Hurts

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 15 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I was going to print this out and study it, but I ... by Suzana Megles on Tuesday, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:11:51 AM
My "agenda" is scholarship and the attempt to dist... by Walter Uhler on Tuesday, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:50:53 AM
Trying to understand the history behind any one re... by anna kakol on Tuesday, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:30:23 PM
This is very well stated. ... by Walter Uhler on Tuesday, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:44:49 PM
It is not "news" that the Bible is not the word of... by Derryl Hermanutz on Tuesday, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:09:19 PM
From where I stand, I don't quite understand why i... by anna kakol on Tuesday, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:46:08 PM
Did people actually see and experience these thing... by anna kakol on Tuesday, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:07:37 PM
 As a student of a great historian, it's esse... by Walter Uhler on Tuesday, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:08:43 PM
It was not my intent to negate what I posted in re... by anna kakol on Tuesday, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:20:02 PM
To this day in the Middle East history is passed v... by Stephen Pizzo on Wednesday, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:46:52 PM
I recommend reading About Christianity, an article... by E. J. N. on Tuesday, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:58:54 PM
It is a hoax that succeeded.... by Mahalingam Santhri N on Wednesday, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:00:10 AM
It was only partly a hoax. Much truth remains in t... by E. J. N. on Wednesday, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:33:43 PM
Perhaps a deeper question we should ask is "where ... by Burl Hall on Thursday, Oct 10, 2013 at 3:27:12 AM
You're right, Burl. What we seek and need most ult... by E. J. N. on Thursday, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:20:39 PM