OpEdNews Op Eds

The Great Obama Rebranding: Part two

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to None 4/28/09

Become a Fan
  (22 fans)
- Advertisement -

            Last week I said I’d take a look at how president Obama was doing on his most difficult task: Rebranding the used-up, soiled image of the American Government, both here and abroad.

            Well, we’re still short of a hundred days, but the first results are in, and they look promising.  This week, for the first time in several years, a slender majority of Americans thinks the country is on the right track.  That’s good progress during bad times at home, and there are some hopeful developments abroad as well.

            In order to understand what Obama is trying to do, and undo, it’s important to understand what went wrong.  How, exactly, was the brand of the “last best hope” of humanity so thoroughly trashed?

            It starts with words.  Words, and their misuse, did more to kill Bush’s presidency than his misguided, poorly-thought-out, often inept and always arrogant policies.  Great job, Brownie.”  Mission accomplished.”  Axis of evil.  Those are the brands that shouted “failure” to America and the world.  No matter how bad the situation, the Bush team found a way to make it look even worse.

            Arrogance was the Bush brand.  He framed his arguments and justified his actions arrogantly; even his benign policies were presented with arrogance.  His politics and policies didn’t ask for agreement, they demanded submission.  He sought not to change minds, but to conquer them.  Those minds closed against him.

            If words are the lifeblood of statecraft, if ideas ultimately power the dynamo of history, then framing those ideas poorly—branding them poorly—sends one into battle with defective weapons.  George Bush faced off against 21st century enemies—from terror networks to Cat Five hurricanes—with a rusty flintlock.

            Bush thought being smart, subtle and persuasive was tantamount to weakness.  His contempt for soft power put us on the defensive everywhere we didn’t have boots on the ground.  It was a dismal failure, and, to be fair, it didn’t start with Bush.

            America’s brand has been characterized by obstreperousness, castigation, insults and general blow-hardism for ages.  It hasn’t worked worth a damn, for us.

- Advertisement -

            But it’s been social security for dictators the world over.  Castro, Chavez, the two Korean Kims and the mullahs in Iran have been in power for decades, despite our “best efforts.”

            American anger is a gift to those guys, they feed off our hostility.  A clever dictator can stay in power for generations if he has an external enemy to blame for all his failures.  We provide that service every time we pump up a tottering regime with hard words and insulting rhetoric.  Aiming at the dictator, we hit the people.  A circle-the-wagons reflex stokes pride and nationalism, and makes them see their dictator as the defender of national self-esteem.

            And we never let them down; our presidents never shook hands with them.  The game could have gone on forever.

            But Obama does shake their hands, in front of the cameras, smiling like he’s enjoying it.  It’s a knife to the heart for the handshakee.

            Just ask Fidel.  Our  policies against Cuba, worse than a pointless relic of the Cold War, were a daily transfusion of lifeblood to that anemic regime.  We tried it all, invasions, embargos, diplomatic isolation, acts of congress, and nothing worked.  Castro was stuck in place like a living fossil, with his brother primed to succeed him as Generalissimo.

- Advertisement -

            Then Obama makes nice with Raul for a couple of weeks and the game changes.  Suddenly Fidel is at his brother’s throat.  Obama’s words did more internal damage to the Castro regime in two weeks than our embargo did in fifty years.

            That’s called being smart.  Obama knows that you can’t sell the tastiest, most nutritious breakfast cereal in the world if you name it “Puke.”  So he rebrands the product, he changes the tone, chooses the words, and even our sworn enemies feel compelled to react.  He sends an infomercial to Iran that puts them on the defensive; they may deplore it but they know they are compelled to answer it.  He drops the negative brand “enemy combatant” and closes Guantanamo, which had a brand as toxic as the Love Canal, and it’s a game changer.  The old anti-American strategies no longer work.

            Obama put our defense in better order by putting our nation in better odor.  He’s got our enemies on the defensive, a thing Bush could never do without firepower.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

San Francisco based columnist, author, gym rat and novelist. My book, "The Confessions of a Catnip Junkie" is the best memoir ever written by a cat. Available on Amazon.com, or wherever fine literature is sold with no sales tax collected. For (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Broken Unions, Broken Nation, and the Lie that Keeps us Broke

Republican Autoerotic Asphyxiation

The Short, Sad Life of Greedaholics Anonymous

How do you know if you're an artist?

"The Memoirs of the White House Janitor." By Cosmo "Ace" Willingham.

What do we lose if we "lose" in Afghanistan?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

You makie fun of Prezidoink Soetoro?Whassamatta yo... by William Whitten on Tuesday, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:46:07 AM
Thank you for a thoughtful, articulate v... by sometimes blinded on Tuesday, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:34:27 PM
But nice, rational comments like yours keep me goi... by Allan Goldstein on Wednesday, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:11:12 AM
Actually I think your analysis of Obama is misguid... by William Whitten on Tuesday, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:17:25 PM
Well it's no accident. He is using whole brain... by Harold Barre on Tuesday, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:18:43 PM
"Genius is down to a technique now"...Barre bul... by William Whitten on Wednesday, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:35:32 AM
blow-hard.  We might have something akin to a... by bucketslogg on Wednesday, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:32:22 PM