Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   13 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Great 'Dictator'

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Supported 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 8/21/12

cross-posted from huffingtonpost

If you have spent any time listening to Hate TV and Hate Radio lately (and given Hate TV/Radio's monopolization of the airwaves, who hasn't?), you have heard Messrs. Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck et al. rant and rave about President Obama's partial implementation of the Dream Act by executive action. Specifically, President Obama has decided that he will not deport law-abiding young men and women who grew up in the United States, who would qualify for a path to citizenship under the Dream Act. Hate TV/Radio can't take issue with the substance of the Dream Act, because Saint Ronald of Reagan once said, "I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and lived here, even though some time back they may have entered illegally" (and then Saint Ronald gave amnesty to three million of "those" and "they"). So what Hate TV/Radio is left with is the argument that by taking executive action, the president supposedly is assuming the power of a dictator, in deciding what law he will enforce or not enforce. 

Unfortunately, in response to this right-wing attack, I have heard no rebuttal, no riposte, no rejoinder, no repartee, and no reprisal. And that is unfortunate, because what they're saying just isn't how it works. 

It is true that Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution says that the president shall "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." But that doesn't make the president some kind of enforcement-bot. The president, like a prosecutor, has prosecutorial discretion. 

Under the principle of prosecutorial discretion, not every case of enforcement that might be brought can be brought, or should be brought. Officials with executive authority can and should establish enforcement priorities, and act on those priorities. Which exactly is what President Obama has done. 

When Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson was Attorney General, he explained it  this way:

"Law enforcement is not automatic. It isn't blind... What every prosecutor is practically required to do is to select the cases for prosecution and to select those in which the offense is the most flagrant, the public harm the greatest, and the proof the most certain."

In the case of Oyler v. Boles, 368 U.S. 448 (1962), the U.S. Supreme Court specifically held that "reasonable selectivity in enforcement" is constitutional. Not dictatorial; constitutional. 

What Hate TV/Radio is doing is following the instructions laid down by Newt Gingrich in 1990, in his Orwellian essay "Language: A Key Mechanism of Control." Gingrich told Republicans to vilify Democrats with vituperative words and phrases, one of which was "abuse of power." The right-wing is accusing President Obama of abuse of power regarding the Dream Act because that term is on Newt's list of magic evil words. (Newt Gingrich is sort of like abolitionist John Brown in reverse; even after defeat, Newt's lies go marching on.) But on this one, Hate TV and Radio are wrong, totally wrong, and the president is right. 

Someone should say that. And I just did.


Alan Grayson


Democratic Congressman from Florida's 8th congressional district.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How To Destroy An Entire Country

You Can't Do Nothing About Nothing

Why Boehner Cries

Rick Santorum Is Wrong

Should Only Seniors Be Allowed to Drive on the Highways? | Rep. Alan Grayson

This Literally Has Nothing to Do With Us


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Congratulate you wholeheartedly for saying the tru... by BFalcon on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:25:59 PM
One of the most important speeches in recorded his... by Ethan Hollow on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:04:32 PM
As roots of English language is Roman empire's "Vu... by Ethan Hollow on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:10:58 PM
The Dream Act is a laudable piece of legislation a... by Chris Cook on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:28:55 PM
more credence to what you and/or others think the ... by Lynne Kringler on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:46:37 AM
I can guarantee you Obama needs Goldman Sachs a he... by Chris Cook on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:43:16 AM
remarkably well without G/S. Business Week D... by Lynne Kringler on Thursday, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:45:16 AM
People would say that he does not uphold the US la... by BFalcon on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:20:30 AM
@Grayson:   Stuff it. You don't represent ... by Ned Lud on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:02:08 AM
Why would he want to represent you?... by BFalcon on Thursday, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:28:36 AM
I do remember the leadership demanding Obama,first... by Mark Ropel on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:27:51 AM
@Lynne Kringler:   You're from Stepford, ri... by Ned Lud on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:33:42 AM
You stepped on it... by BFalcon on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:23:52 AM