Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
No comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The GOP's Shutdown Tab: One Billion Dollars and Counting

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Source: Campaign For America's Future



Forty million dollars an hour. A third of a billion every day. $1.6 billion every week. That's a conservative estimate of the money Republicans are wasting by keeping the federal government closed down. And if pundits like Sean Hannity have their way, they'll run up a much larger tab before this is all over.

But then, if there's one thing Republicans know how to do, it's run a tab.

The bill has already come to roughly $1 billion as of today (Thursday), and it grows larger every moment the government stays shut down. Republicans in Congress recently voted to cut $4 billion per year from programs that feed the needy. In two-and-a-half weeks they'll have wasted more than that on their shutdown.

Why? "We're not going to be disrespected," said one Republican House member. "We have to get something out of this. And I don't know what that even is."

If you think that's worth billions of dollars and the paralysis of the federal government, the GOP's the party for you.

This stunt isn't just costly and wasteful. It's endangering a fragile economy, and the jobs that go with it.

And what are we getting for their billion-dollar boondoggle? Nothing. Literally: We get nothing. The GOP's federal shutdown is on the verge of becoming the most fiscally irresponsible gesture in modern political history.

Running a Tab

That $1.6 billion per week figure first received widespread publicity when Morgan Stanley's analytical team began discussing the potential cost of the shutdown, expressed in "basis points" (see notes below), in an investor newsletter this week. (A Morgan Stanley team member confirmed the number with us on Wednesday.) Other groups, including IHS Global Insight, have since offered similar estimates.

While there could very likely be additional costs to the economy, economist Dean Baker said it was difficult to estimate them in advance. "That's where it gets speculative," Baker told us earlier Wednesday, "because there are many possible scenarios -- if, for example, a single [Food and Drug Administration] inspector misses an outbreak because he or she wasn't on the job."

As Think Progress and others have noted, the human costs of the shutdown will be felt immediately. The Small Business Administration has stopped issuing loans, directly hurting the kinds of businesses that create jobs. The National Institutes of Health has stopped accepting patients for experimental treatment (including terminally ill children), while other health cuts are affecting hospital care and physicians in medical school. Disaster relief in Colorado has come to a halt.

Fox News' editors and television personalities have taking to describing the shutdown as a "slimdown." Their amusement won't be shared by the mothers of hungry children in Arkansas, where 85,000 meals for lower-income kids will not be served as a result of the GOP's actions.

The Big Picture

The shutdown also incurs broader and less easily quantified costs that ripple throughout the economy.

Economist Stephen Fuller, who runs George Mason University's Center for Regional Analysis, estimated this weekend that the Washington, D.C. metropolitan economy could lose as much as $200 million for each day the government remains closed. Since only 15 percent of Federal workers live in the D.C. area, the true cost of the shutdown nationwide (including parts of the country with lower living costs) could conceivably be $1 billion per day or more.

Even those mothers and children receiving assistance -- a frequent target for the un-Christian Right -- contribute to the economy. Mothers without food assistance will buy less food. The same is true of suspended food programs. The party that gives billions in agricultural subsidies to corporate farms is willing to cut into those farms' profits just to deny food to kids.

Sean Hannity: Hey, Big Spender

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/the-dumbest-bipartisa

Host of 'The Breakdown,' Writer, and Senior Fellow, Campaign for America's Future
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How to Fix the Fed: Dismiss Dimon, Boot the Bankers, and Can the Corporations

The Top 12 Political Fallacies of 2012

Pawn: The Real George Zimmerman Story

What America Would Look Like If Libertarians Got Their Way

"F" The Bureaucracy! The White House Can Help Homeowners Right Now

The Price of Evil at JPMorgan Chase

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments