Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
7 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Fox News Alternative Reality Makes Any Middle Ground Impossible.

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 2   Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 2/6/14
Become a Fan
  (22 fans)

opednews.com

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/47422005@N04/9925141983/: Bill O'Reilly - Caricature
Bill O'Reilly - Caricature
(image by DonkeyHotey)

There simply is no political middle ground in America anymore. For instance, when I offer verifiable facts to counter someone who trashes this president with lies,   distortions and the latest Fox News meme, I am accused of being a thoughtless sycophant. (But usually they don't use big words like sycophant. They call me other awful names, like "Obama supporter")

The reality show advertised as the O'Reilly interview of President Obama on Super Bowl Sunday was revealing. As usual, O'Reilly was the star. This time he had Mr. Obama as a prop, there to be interrupted for the purposes of proving O'Reilly's brilliance and improving his ratings (and income, of course), as he pandered to his loyal followers. Who I'm sure felt vicariously vindicated as O'Reilly did his usual thing, pounding on his guest.

Washington Post's Dana Milbank had one of the best takes, "The Fox News host and purveyor of anti-Obama sentiment was given 10 minutes to question the man he decries to millions nightly. O'Reilly devoted nearly 40 percent of his time to the attacks on U.S. facilities in Benghazi, 30 percent to the Obamacare rollout and 20 percent to IRS targeting.

Along the way, he interrupted the president 42 times, by my count -- although, given the amount O'Reilly spoke, it may be more accurate to say Obama was interrupting him. Sometimes he argued with Obama as though the president were a guest on "The O'Reilly Factor." Of the 2,500 words uttered during the interview, O'Reilly spoke nearly 1,000 of them."

This show was an excellent example of how showboats like O'Reilly and his ilk keep their listeners and viewers hyped up on emotional flotsam and jetsam instead of facts. So much so that when they are confronted with facts, they cannot distinguish them from absolute mindless support of the person they hate.

Read, view or listen to any conservative, right wing, fundamentalist Christian, Republican influenced news paper, magazine, website, radio show, cable show or podcast and you will be introduced to another reality in America. A reality that only exists in the minds of the faithful. A reality where there are only good guys and bad guys and someone has to be to blamed for every incident that happens in the world.

A reality that is reinforced with well designed and executed memes like, "Obamacare is a disaster," or this "increasingly lawless president."

Don't believe me? Anytime a Republican has a mic available, listen for yourself.   I have to hand it to them. They are as disciplined as newly-minted, Marine boot camp graduates. And just about as creative.

Defend the president against any accusations -- mindless, thoughtless, emotionally groundless, ridden with hyperbole, off the wall, completely wrong -- and you automatically love Mr. Obama and everything he does with no reservations or concerns.

Now some of you might be saying, "but you do the same thing" but lean toward the left No. I see too   many shades of gray to take hard positions on every incident. I don't see a need to blame someone for everything that goes wrong, with the exception of the Bush administration's lying us into two unnecessary wars and the loss of thousands of lives and trillions of dollars. But in that case, no one denies the facts, they just try to obscure them.

Most of my material has to do with the damages being done by people in positions of power when they try to implement ideas that separate, judge, condemn and control   others. It just so happens that most of them are members of the Tea Party and/or one of the many fundamentalist Christianity cults. Their overwrought   paranoia deserves everyone's indignation.

In summary, when someone dislikes a politician for reasons other than can be supported with facts and then gets confronted with facts that support that politician, it doesn't mean the confronter is in full support of everything the politician does.

I know. That's a complex sentence and difficult to understand. But, it's exactly like life.

Robert De Filippis  

 

Author, columnist and blogger with a long career in business management, management consulting and executive coaching. I am a certified ontological coach. I've studied clinical therapeutic practices in Gestalt psychology and am a Certified Birkman (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Illinois Is Now on Board. We Can Carry Concealed Weapons in Every State.

The Primary American Meme: Be Afraid.

What Jesus said and What the Christian Lunatic Fringe Hears.

This Pope Makes Me Want to be an Atheist

Don't be Fooled: Black Racism Causes White Racism

Ethan Couch: An Example of the Pathology of Wealth

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I only saw a few snippets, including where the pre... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:12:41 PM
Mr. Obama's demeanor made O'Reilly look like the g... by Robert De Filippis on Thursday, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:01:29 PM
If it depends on perceiving something as nuanced a... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:32:39 PM
Wouldn't an acceptable definition of lunacy be th... by Mike Farris on Friday, Feb 7, 2014 at 6:30:25 AM
That "lock-step mentality" is a great description... by Robert De Filippis on Friday, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:28:29 AM
Mr De Filippis, you've nailed it and I'm signing o... by Larry Butler on Saturday, Feb 8, 2014 at 8:16:37 AM
Great article! I totally agree, even though with a... by Robert De Filippis on Saturday, Feb 8, 2014 at 10:33:11 AM