Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 4 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (6 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   10 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Democrats Can't Defend the Country from the Retrograde GOP

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 3   Interesting 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 10/18/13

The Congress, that polls show the American people would like to replace in its entirety, has "kicked the can down the road" again, putting off the government shutdown until January 15 th  and another debt ceiling showdown until February 7 th .

The polls also show, convincingly, that people blame the stubborn Republicans more than the Democrats for the adverse effects of the impasse on workers, public health, safety, consumer spending, recreational parks and government corporate contracts.

There is another story about how all this gridlock came to be, fronted by the question: "Why didn't the Democrats landslide the cruelest, most ignorant, big-business-indentured Republican Party in its history during the 2010 and 2012 Congressional elections? (See  "The Do Nothing Congress: A Record of Extremism and Partisanship" )

There are a number of answers to this fundamental political question. First and most obvious is that the Democrats are dialing for the same commercial campaign dollars, which beyond the baggage of  quid pro quo  money, detours the Party away from concentrating on their constituents' needs, in a contrasting manner with the GOP.

Democrats like Rep. Marcy Kaptur (Dem. Ohio) tell me that when the House Democrats get together in an election year, they go into the meetings talking about money and walk out talking about money, burdened with the quotas assigned by their so-called leadership.

Last year, House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi (Dem. Calif.) was reported to have attended 400 fundraisers in DC and around the country for her campaigning Democrats. Helping Democratic candidates with fundraising is a major way she asserts her control over them. Over ninety percent of the Democrats in the House defer to her and do not press her on such matters as upping the federal minimum wage, controlling corporate crime, reducing corporate welfare giveaways, reasserting full Medicare for all, diminishing a militaristic foreign policy and other policies reputed to be favored by the Party's Progressive Caucus, numbering 75 Representatives. Instead, the Progressive Caucus remains moribund, declining to press their policy demands on leader Pelosi, as the hardcore Tea Partiers do with their leaders.
  
So when election time comes around, voters do not know what the Democrats stand for other than to save Social Security and Medicare from the Republicans. Former Senator and Presidential candidate Gary Hart, now living in Denver, said last year that the local Democrats in Denver didn't know what the national Democrats stood for.
From http://www.flickr.com/photos/43931600@N06/10234652754/
by Marc Aubin2009

  
The 2010 election was crucial for the winners in the state government races who gained the upper hand in redistricting decisions for a decade. That meant more gerrymandered one-party dominated districts. The Republicans won a majority of those gubernatorial and state legislative races and took over the U.S. House of Representatives with Speaker John Boehner (Rep. Ohio) and his curled-lip deputy, Eric Cantor (Rep. Va.).
  
And there is also President Obama's political selfishness. Obama knew that he could not govern with a knee-jerk blocking Republican House of Representatives. Yet he did not provide serious campaign support and progressive policy leadership for Democratic candidates. Consequently he was overcome in 2011 by the Republican demands for sharp cuts in federal budgets serving people, while exempting corporate entitlements from similar cuts, and the spectre of government shutdowns and Republicans in Congress refusing to raise the government's debt ceiling to pay current debts, during his first term Presidency.
  
So you'd think that in 2012 President Obama would run arm-in-arm with Congressional Democrats. No way. He not only signaled his "going it alone" approach by turning down a Democrat's request for $30 million from his billion dollar campaign hoard, but he had little interest in campaigning with the local Congressional candidates as he travelled around the country. The House Democrats were dismayed, but kept quiet.
  
So he got the Boehner/Cantor duo for another two years after the 2012 election. That meant another shut-the-government-down don't-lift-the-debt-ceiling imbroglio -- a clash that crowded out all the necessities and the matters of justice that our government is supposed to champion. The greed and power of the Walmarts, the Exxons, the Aetnas, the Lockheed Martins and the rest of the global corporate power structure that has turned its back on taxpaying, American workers and their families remains unchecked by our government.
  
Fast forward to the elections of 2014. No House Democrat believed, until the recent Congressional impasse, that the Democrats would win back the House in 2014. Given that many House-passed Republican votes since 2011 sided with big business, on the wrong side of fair treatment of children, student borrowers, workers, women, consumers, small taxpayers and providing necessary public services, one would think the Democrats should win next year in a slam dunk. Not likely, unless the Republican echo chamber, with its "mad dog" extremists, hand control of the House to the Democrats.
 
From the Nineteen Forties to the Nineteen Nineties, the Republican Party did not behave as badly as today's snarling version of the GOP. Yet the Democrats beat Republicans in most Congressional races. Imagine what Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, John F. Kennedy and Lyndon Baines Johnson would have done with today's crop of Republican corporatists and rabid ideologues.
  
Today's Democrats with very few exceptions are dull, tired and defeatist. They regularly judge themselves by how bad the Republican Party is, instead of how affirmatively good they could be for our country and its politically alienated people. They cannot even muster themselves to battle for a higher minimum wage on behalf of 30 million American workers, just to the level of 1968, inflation adjusted, which is supported by over 70 percent of the people.

Neither Harry Reid, the Senate Majority Leader, nor House Democratic Leader, Nancy Pelosi are really taking this minimum wage fairness issue to the people and directly confronting the Republican Party. Yet they both profess to believe in "catching up with 1968." They just don't believe in themselves enough to generate the focused energy to make it happen.

(For those readers interested in letting their members of Congress have an earful, the switchboard is  202-224-3121 .)

 

Ralph Nader is one of America's most effective social critics. Named by The Atlantic as one of the 100 most influential figures in American history, and by Time and Life magazines as one of (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Corporate Supreme Court; Time For Impeachment

Time to Topple Corporate Dictators

Ralph Nader: Only the Super Rich Can Save Us!

The Fukushima Secrecy Syndrome -- From Japan to America

President Obama Treats Tax Dodging GE's Immelt Better than Consumer Protecting Elizabeth Warren

My Friend Barack

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

As usual, Ralph you are correct.  But what to... by Bobs Your Uncle on Friday, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:08:26 PM
Not correct, not at all.For decades people were bo... by BFalcon on Friday, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:57:10 PM
As soon as I got into this Nader article, I said t... by Charles Roll on Saturday, Oct 19, 2013 at 4:34:58 AM
President Obama is a pragmatist.This may be the on... by BFalcon on Saturday, Oct 19, 2013 at 9:21:20 AM
It comes down to that Ralph Nader is the one-and-o... by Charles Roll on Saturday, Oct 19, 2013 at 4:46:54 AM
Thanks, I like your comment.It would be nice to ha... by BFalcon on Saturday, Oct 19, 2013 at 9:14:56 AM
How to push back against the Teapublicans? Volunte... by Bo on Saturday, Oct 19, 2013 at 10:49:23 AM
Persuasive, solid analysis. I'm aiming to be a Dem... by Geoffrey Young on Saturday, Oct 19, 2013 at 11:06:34 AM
I think that the first thing is to realize that an... by Scott Miller on Saturday, Oct 19, 2013 at 4:53:04 PM
I don't believe Mr. Nader...who I have supported a... by BARBARA BF on Sunday, Oct 20, 2013 at 3:53:26 PM