Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 3 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   8 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The DREAM Act Goes Down... Again

By Andrew Grant-Thomas, Deputy Director, Kirwan Institute  Posted by Jamaal Bell (about the submitter)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 12/21/10

- Advertisement -
A couple of weeks ago the US House of Representatives approved the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act, better known as the DREAM Act. This past Saturday, almost 10 years after its initial introduction, a minority of Senators used the threat of a filibuster to end all hopes of its passage.

The DREAM Act would allow young immigrants brought into the country illegally before age 16 to stay, apply for permanent residence, and eventually apply for US citizenship. There would be strict conditions. Beneficiaries would have to be younger than 30, have lived in the US five or more years straight, and have earned a GED or high school diploma. If they completed at least two years of college or military service and passed various background checks, they would then be able to apply for permanent resident status.

Before the critical vote, Republican Senator Jeff Sessions denounced the Act as "a reward for illegal activities." Senator Lindsey Graham insisted we pass border security before moving the DREAM Act. Given these gentlemen's status as protectors of the national interest, this stance is also known as cutting off your nose to spite your face.

The US Department of Defense strongly supports the DREAM Act.  The offer of military service as a path to citizenship would have led tens, possibly hundreds of thousands of immigrants to enlist. With the US military stretched to the breaking point by wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, top officials saw the DREAM Act as a key recruiting tool. Indeed, the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness refers to the DREAM Act in its 2010-2012 strategic plan as a "smart" way to draw good recruits to military service.

The Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, called on Congress to pass the Act.

So Senator Graham yelps about the need to enhance US national security through border security, on one hand, while blocking the use of a key military recruitment tool and thereby undercutting national security, on the other. Just politics, I guess.
- Advertisement -


Who else besides the military supports the DREAM Act? Just in the business community alone, we see such weak-kneed, namby-pamby, liberal do-gooding luminaries as the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce, the US Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, Microsoft, Pfizer, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase, American Express, and Con Edison petitioning the Congress to do the smart thing.

Why? Because Big Business knows that immigrants who took the higher education route to citizenship would mean billions in additional tax revenue and greater national competitiveness in the global economy. They know that the US is now seeing a slight out-migration of educated talent headed for greener economic pastures in India, China and elsewhere. As New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg put it, if we can't keep the best and the brightest in the United States, and attract more of them to the United States, all the next big business innovations will happen outside the United States.

Unlike many of the young entrepreneurs now leaving the United States, the young people embraced by the DREAM Act are American in everything but name. Their talent, nurtured here, would remain America's talent.

I wish I could say "wait 'til next time" and shake my fist with respect to the prospect of passing the DREAM Act sooner than later, but with the Republican opposition gaining strength in the new Congress at least two years will pass before we can reasonably hope to hope again. Oh well. At least somebody - if only the nation's military and economic competitors - will be pleased.

Crossposted from Race-Talk.org.
- Advertisement -

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Editor
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

White Man's Burden Redux: The Movie!

A New Lesson from the Old “Tuskegee” Study

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Let DREAM wait two years.When it is election time ... by Paul Kruger on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:11:36 PM
I can understand that the military would like a la... by Jim Arnold on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:45:45 PM
How can such a bill not be an invitation to fraud?... by zonie on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:12:29 PM
The Dream Act was at best a liberal compromise. To... by Vernon Huffman on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 4:43:15 PM
Life embodies friendship, compassion, happiness,... by YJ Draiman on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 4:51:34 PM
Vernon and YJ, you've both expressed ideals and co... by Jim Arnold on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:44:29 PM
I'm happy it failed to pass.... by Charlene Richards on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:42:45 PM
Lets work on supporting our LEGAL citizens first. ... by Laura Roberts on Wednesday, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:28:03 AM