Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 17 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 45 (62 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   61 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Corporate Supreme Court; Time For Impeachment

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 21   Well Said 17   Supported 13  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 7/18/11

Five Supreme Court Justices--Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, Alito and Kennedy are entrenching, in a whirlwind of judicial dictates, judicial legislating and sheer ideological judgments, a mega-corporate supremacy over the rights and remedies of individuals.

The artificial entity called "the corporation" has no mention in our Constitution whose preamble starts with "We the People," not "We the Corporation."

Taken together the decisions are brazenly over-riding sensible precedents, tearing apart the state common law of torts and blocking class actions, shoving aside jury verdicts, limiting people's "standing to sue", pre-empting state jurisdictions--anything that serves to centralize power and hand it over to the corporate conquistadores.



Here are some examples. (For more see thecorporatecourt.com). Remember  the disastrous Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska's Prince William Sound twenty two years ago? It destroyed marine life and the livelihoods of many landowners, fishermen and native Alaskans. Its toxic effects continue to this day.

Well, after years of litigation by Alaskan fishermen, the Supreme Court took the case to review a $5 billion award the trial court had assessed in punitive damages. A 5 to 3 decision lowered the sum to $507.5 million which is less than what Exxon made in interest by delaying the case for twenty years. Moreover, the drunken Exxon captain's oil tanker calamity raised the price of gasoline at the pump for awhile. Exxon actually made a profit despite its discharge of 50 million gallons.

The unelected, life-tenured corporate court was just getting started and every year they tighten the noose of corporatism around the American people.

In Bush v. Gore (5-4 decision), the Court picked the more corporate president of the United States in 2000, leaving constitutional scholars thunderstruck at this breathtaking seizure of the electoral process, stopping the Florida Supreme Court's ongoing state-wide recount. The five Republican Justices behaved as political hacks conducting a judicial coup d'etat.

But then what do you expect from justices like Thomas and Scalia who participate in a Koch brothers' political retreat or engage in extrajudicial activities that shake the public confidence in the highest court of the land.

Last year came the Citizens United v. FEC case where the Republican majority went out of its way to decide a question that the parties to the appeal never asked. In a predatory "frolic and detour," the 5 justices declared that corporations (including foreign companies) no longer have to obey the prohibitory federal law and their own court's precedents.

Corporations like Pfizer, Aetna, Chevron, GM, Citigroup, Monsanto can spend unlimited funds (without asking their shareholders) in independent expenditures to oppose or support candidates for public office from a local city council election to federal Congressional and Presidential elections.

Once again our judicial dictatorship has spoken for corporate privilege and power overriding the rights of individual voters.

Eighty percent of the American people, reported a Washington Post poll, reject the Court's view that a business corporation is entitled to the same free speech rights as citizens.

Chances are very high that in cases between workers and companies, consumers and companies, communities and corporations, tax payers and military contractors--big business wins.

Inanimate corporations created by state government charters have risen as Frankensteins to control the people through one judicial activist decision after another. It was the Supreme Court in 1886 that started treating a corporation as a "person" for purposes of the equal protection right in the fourteenth amendment. Actually the scribe manufactured that conclusion in the headnotes even though the Court's opinion did not go that far. But then it was off to the races. These inanimate giants, astride the globe, have privileges and immunities that "We the People" can only dream about, yet they have equal constitutional rights with us (except for the right against self-incrimination (Fifth Amendment) and more limited privacy rights.)

What is behind these five corporate Justices' decisions is a commercial philosophy that big business knows best for you and your children. These Justices intend to drive this political jurisprudence to further extremes, so long as they are in command, to twist our founders clear writings that the Constitution was for the supremacy of human beings.

To see how extreme the five corporate justices are, consider the strong contrary view of one of their conservative heroes, the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist in a case where a plurality of justices threw out a California regulation requiring an insert in utility bills inviting residential ratepayers to band together to advance their interests against Pacific Gas and Electric. The prevailing justices said--get this--that it violated the electric company monopoly's first amendment right to remain silent and not respond to the insert's message.

Conservative Justice Rehnquist's dissent contained these words--so totally rejected by the present-day usurpers: "Extension of the individual freedom of conscience decisions to business corporations strains the rationale of those cases beyond the breaking point. To ascribe to such artificial entities an "intellect" or "mind" for freedom of conscience purposes is to confuse metaphor with reality."

It was left to another conservative jurist, the late Justice Byron White, dissenting in the corporatist decision First Nat'l Bank v. Bellotti (1978) to recognize the essential principle.

Corporations, Justice White wrote, are "in a position to control vast amounts of economic power which may, if not regulated, dominate not only the economy but also the very heart of our democracy, the electoral process." The state, he continued, has a compelling interest in "preventing institutions which have been permitted to amass wealth as a result of special advantages extended by the State for certain economic purposes from using that wealth to acquire an unfair advantage in the political process". The state need not permit its own creation to consume it." (emphasis added)

Never have I urged impeachment of Supreme Court justices. I do so now, for the sake of ending the Supreme Court's corporate-judicial dictatorship that is not accountable under our system of checks and balance in any other way.

 

Ralph Nader is one of America's most effective social critics. Named by The Atlantic as one of the 100 most influential figures in American history, and by Time and Life magazines as one of (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Corporate Supreme Court; Time For Impeachment

Time to Topple Corporate Dictators

Ralph Nader: Only the Super Rich Can Save Us!

The Fukushima Secrecy Syndrome -- From Japan to America

President Obama Treats Tax Dodging GE's Immelt Better than Consumer Protecting Elizabeth Warren

My Friend Barack

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
38 people are discussing this page, with 61 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Ralph, I hate these RATS as much as Bush, Reagan, ... by Paul from Potomac on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 1:54:49 PM
A case can clearly be made that these justices hav... by Robert Wolfe on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:27:16 PM
have abandoned their sworn oath of office to prote... by Michael Shaw on Tuesday, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:12:07 AM
I was a great admirer of yours until 2000, when yo... by Michael Henderson on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:04:51 PM
that cost Gore the election.As for grounds for imp... by Samuel Bryan on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:37:52 PM
Considering that Gore actually had 500,000 votes m... by Jeff Poster on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:20:51 PM
First reason Nader didn't cost Gore the Presidency... by Adnihilo on Tuesday, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:40:41 AM
His being in the race COULD have cost Gore the ele... by Jeff Poster on Tuesday, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:59:13 PM
the Supreme Court who made the final decision and ... by Silverpegasus on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:50:37 PM
If the election wasn't so close (at least in FL) t... by Jeff Poster on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:43:36 PM
The only blame Ralph Nader should get is his runni... by Michael Shaw on Tuesday, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:20:21 AM
Ralph didn't cause Gore to lose!! Gore caused Gore... by David Weaver on Tuesday, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:31:22 PM
For stopping the Florida recount--which would have... by R.A. on Tuesday, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:01:03 PM
Having an individual vote with their heart is one ... by Greg Campbell on Thursday, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:43:52 AM
When someone or some group arms themselves and sta... by David Smith on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:06:42 PM
Are you starting an official impeachment recall of... by Maryrose Asher on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:08:58 PM
Realistically, how could we impeach them?  It... by Davidson Loehr on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:27:24 PM
Nadar's makes the obvious link between the Court a... by David Ruhlen on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:29:32 PM
Liberty lies in the hearts and minds of men and wo... by Mark A. Goldman on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:31:14 PM
I was under the premise that the Supreme Court was... by Dennis Kaiser on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:31:24 PM
Sometimes I wonder which is more insane...1) Five ... by Greg Campbell on Thursday, Jul 21, 2011 at 7:39:32 PM
ABSOLUTELY - - - The Supreme Court Justices who ha... by Fritz Sherrick on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:33:00 PM
Getting rid of a fascist Supreme Court, is like ge... by Greg Campbell on Thursday, Jul 21, 2011 at 6:02:34 AM
Why not have a constitutional convention and make ... by Ernie Messerschmidt on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:40:00 PM
Bush was appointed to President by the Supreme Cou... by Steven G. Erickson on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:48:59 PM
I agree 100% with the comments of Ralph Nader. Wha... by Stewart Robinson on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:49:47 PM
***What we need in this country to turn the tide a... by Greg Campbell on Thursday, Jul 21, 2011 at 6:35:32 PM
This is just the latest of Ralph Nader's actions w... by Elaine Cullen on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:19:01 PM
re. It is quite evident that what he has been enga... by Adnihilo on Tuesday, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:54:59 AM
re. This is just the latest of Ralph Nader's actio... by Adnihilo on Tuesday, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:59:01 AM
Even "corporate criminals," such as 'the filthy ri... by Greg Campbell on Thursday, Jul 21, 2011 at 7:03:29 PM
re. This is just the latest of Ralph Nader's actio... by Adnihilo on Tuesday, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:00:28 AM
As far as Alan Greenspan, I'd be more concerned ab... by Greg Campbell on Thursday, Jul 21, 2011 at 6:42:15 AM
Five Supreme Court Justices--Scalia, Thomas, Robe... by Carol Lemieux on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:30:43 PM
Ralph, you sure have it right, and impeaching Clar... by Sue Wilson on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:35:28 PM
attack on "Citizens United".... by Samuel Bryan on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:17:54 PM
Bingo!! I cannot add to your comment here. It is P... by Greg Campbell on Thursday, Jul 21, 2011 at 6:54:32 AM
xxxooo !!!... by Sue Wilson on Thursday, Jul 21, 2011 at 6:14:08 PM
When the fiat dollar dies the 'Supreme Corporate C... by JT Me on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:56:54 PM
Amen...            C... by Greg Campbell on Thursday, Jul 21, 2011 at 7:20:33 PM
Stop the corporate funding that allows hoodlums t... by Bill Hammond on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:59:09 PM
This b.s. (sponsored by our local chamber of comme... by Greg Campbell on Thursday, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:55:54 PM
Big Brother is in the house. Impeachment almost ... by Donald on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:14:19 PM
Talk, talk, talk, its all very tiresome. This has ... by Jack Heart on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:22:21 PM
Although I do applaud Ralph Nader and the rest, wh... by Greg Campbell on Thursday, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:32:51 PM
and has parted ways with the intent of the Constit... by John Shriver on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 5:06:01 PM
    Ralph forgot to mention the Ariz... by Larry Kachimba on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:38:45 PM
Ralph you make a compelling argument for Impeachin... by Patrick McGean on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:55:16 PM
In the decade that Daniels climbed the corporate l... by Greg Campbell on Thursday, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:04:45 PM
Simple.  That's what they are.  Comicall... by Lester Shepherd on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:29:03 PM
Excellent article! I used to be a lawyer, and then... by Helion Cruz Gonzalez on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:43:29 PM
Great idea!!          &nb... by Greg Campbell on Thursday, Jul 21, 2011 at 6:21:40 PM
Isn't it a tad late to be concerning ourselves wit... by Nancy S on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:26:08 PM
Hi Nancy--I don't know if you know about public ba... by Elizabeth Hanson on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:38:04 PM
Great work Elizabeth! Its so great to see someone ... by Nancy S on Tuesday, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:02:55 AM
and refinance mortgage loans. Public banks would k... by Michael Shaw on Tuesday, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:46:36 AM
I remember a talk given by Wendell Berry at the Se... by Ned Lud on Tuesday, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:41:09 AM
Restore Glass-Steagall :)Audit the Fed :)... by Greg Campbell on Thursday, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:13:33 PM
The movie "Inside Job," along with the flow chart ... by Greg Campbell on Thursday, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:10:05 PM
optimism of the socio-psychopathic propaganda of m... by bogi666 on Tuesday, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:12:03 AM
Read the commentary at the bottom of the ... by E. J. N. on Wednesday, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:02:14 PM