Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 9 (11 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   22 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Bush Effect -- The Morons Are Coming!

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Funny 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 6/7/11

Become a Fan
  (9 fans)

Politics used to be about smart people. It used to be about people who understood global issues as well as local need. People with higher education and higher aspiration for public service than the rest of us. Presidents and those who would pursue the office would be of a learned type with a deep understanding of history, economics, and even a pretty good handle on the English language. But somewhere along the line we have lost a grip on the importance of intelligence in this country. It started when the Foxygen started flowing in the late 1990s. When the esteemed fourth estate of media became a shill game and a propaganda racket. Suddenly stupid became relevant again. Enter the catalyst for the dumbing down of America, George W. Bush.  

I could get into the quotes. You know the ones. The ones that show the true mental incompetence of our 43rd president. It's almost too easy; unfair. I know when it all changed in this country. During the 2000 campaign for president we had a clearly superior candidate in Al Gore. There of course was Clinton fatigue and Gore did not run a particularly smart campaign but things crystallized for the intellectually challenged when a poll was conducted asking which candidate you would rather have a beer with. I remember thinking I would prefer that my president don't drink personally. Then I thought back to my days in the bar and shuddered to think of someone in there who I would want to see as president.

But George W. Bush won that poll, hands down. Then the poll got Foxified. All we heard from that point on was how Gore was an elitist and Bush was a down to earth-guy next door-let's go have ourselves brewskie kinda guy! So what if he doesn't actually have any foreign policy experience and can't find China on a map? So what if he went AWOL from the cushy gig his father got him in the National Guard? So what that he can't form a coherent sentence with two hands and a thesaurus? We all know what happened next. Bush's cousin was working the election desk for Fox and called it for Georgie even though it was not decided and when the smoke cleared the Supremes stole the election. No sour grapes. Just historical fact for anyone who doesn't get their news from Fox.

And then we suffered for eight years. Eight years of watching our president struggle to find the door to exit a room. Eight years of bumbling and fumbling with basic grammar and behavior. We had a chance in 2004 but once again the Foxygen was flowing and Kerry was the new elitist. We watched as Fox allowed people to destroy the service record of John Kerry while Bush just smiled and said, "Wasn't me!" Stupid was still in. It was considered "folksy", whatever the hell that is supposed to mean.

The Bush Effect is still being felt today. It is what gave life to someone like Sarah Palin. Don't misunderestimate me. I like Sarah; I really like her. I want her to run for president. Run Sarah, run. For comedic value alone I hope she runs. Can you imagine an Obama -- Palin debate? Mills Lane will have to step in and stop it in the second round. What I love about Sarah Palin is the intricate depths of her stupidity. She isn't just unimpressive. She apparently works very hard at being uninformed. It is almost as if she is some kind of Zen master of ridiculousness. Just when you think she has hit bottom, you find she has another depth to sink to in her un-intellectualism. When she couldn't name any Supreme Court decisions, I gave her a bit of a pass. Then she couldn't name any books she read and I thought wow, this can't get any worse. But then she said the bizarre thing about seeing Russia from her porch to explain her foreign policy bonifides and I realized that we were seeing something special in Sarah Palin. I mean like once in a lifetime special. You would think that your average person who knows nothing would accidentally be right on occasion but she blows right past the laws of logic and scholarly physics. I mean even a broken clock is right twice a day. Even the blind squirrel finds a nut every now and again. But not Princess Sarah. I'm afraid if she ever did find a nut she would call it an apple and regale us for days about how she was technically right.

The latest offense upon the collective acumen occurred in Massachusetts on her never ending, no real purpose, self indulgent bus tour to nowhere. Normally I would summarize but I want you to really digest this comment in its entirety and within context:

"We saw where Paul Revere hung out as a teenager, which was something new to learn. And, you know, he who warned the British that they weren't going to be taking away our arms by ringing those bells and making sure, as he is riding his horse through town, to send those warning shots and bells, that we were going to be secure and we were going to be free."

Because the fake media think they can Foxify anything they want, there have been "experts" and "historians" lining up the airwaves to try and say that technically Sarah was right. Allow me to be clear. SHE WAS NOT RIGHT. Not at all. Not even a sliver. First of all the entire statement is inaccurate, not just the portion dealing with warning the British, which is especially inaccurate. But again, what do we expect from someone who thinks she can see Yeltsin from her porch and doesn't really read anything? What do we expect from someone who thinks Katie Couric is a tough interviewer and thinks "What did you see on your visit and what will you take away" is a "gotchya" question? Like Jon Stewart said last night, just because the question got you; doesn't mean it was a "gotchya" question.

No one asked her about Paul Revere, history or anything academic at all. They merely asked her how her day went. That is how low intellectually Sarah Palin has set the bar. Asking "How's it going" to a candidate for the Presidency of the United States of America is now akin to trying to trap the poor candidate in a difficult question. But the maddeningly frustrating thing is to watch her then defend the nonsense. She will trot out on her own network, where not only are the questions easy but she gets them ahead of time and try to rewrite history. This is the real problem. It is not just the dumbing down it is the arrogance and disdain for truth and facts. THAT is the dangerous mix. She could have just said, "Obviously I meant warn the colonists." Everyone would have poked a little fun and went on with their lives. Instead, Sarah Palin wants us to believe that she was on a deeper intellectual plane than the rest of the country. That she actually meant that Revere was ALSO warning the British that were already in the colonies that they weren't going take the militias arms. Uh-huh. This despite the fact that the quote she gave also included "riding his horse through town" -- "ringing bells" -- and "firing warning shots." Apparently we have discovered what Sarah reads. She must have the only copy of Paul Revere's diary.

Those who follow my writing know that I have been no big fan of Chris Matthews. I think he is paying his liberal penance now for all the selling he did on the Iraq War. But I do like it when he deals with the Palin factor. He calls her "profoundly stupid." In a world of political correctness, it is refreshing to hear someone on television say what we all know and feel. Sarah Palin is profoundly stupid. When Matthews speaks about her you can see he is genuinely insulted as a clear thinking American that she is even allowed into the political discourse. Because while I may not agree with Matthews on everything, he at least remembers when politics was a serious business. He remembers politics before the Bush Effect took hold. Before the horrible poll on who you would rather have a beer with. He remembers when someone like Sarah Palin would have been exposed by the media and cast to the side as simply not credible. Instead, she paints a bus like she is Shirley Partridge meets Ben Franklin and travels across our land to tell us why her inane comments should be taken as historical fact. She has her own "news" channel to back her up of course. To prop her up and try to make her seem relevant. She is not of course. She is not quaint. She is not hocky-momma-grizzley. She is not even mavericky. She is a moron. And I am warning you America, and what the heck -- ill warn the British too -- she is coming.  

 

Anthony Wade, a contributing writer to opednews.com, is dedicated to educating the populace to the lies and abuses of the government. He is a 46-year-old independent writer from New York with political commentary articles seen on multiple (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Preparing the Cover Story for the Theft of the Election

Sarah Palin, A Wolf in Moose Clothing

Hate and Hypocrisy Pays Well – The Rush Limbaugh Payoff

Birth of the Red-Letter Christian Movement

First They Came For the Soda"

Why, As a born again Christian, I cannot morally vote for John McCain

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
12 people are discussing this page, with 22 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I'll ring the bells for you!... by Anthony Wade on Tuesday, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:44:18 PM
if we here understand that if someone like Sarah&n... by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:33:10 PM
I thought about that part of the issue when writin... by Anthony Wade on Tuesday, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:39:12 PM
 I would love to hear your comments. Sarah Pa... by James Murtagh on Friday, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:11:20 AM
In 2008 we had a statesman of vast experience who ... by Robert Tracey on Tuesday, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:07:10 PM
There is a hierarchy of "needs doing" in our count... by Elizabeth Hanson on Tuesday, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:40:55 PM
It's a Rube Goldberg scheme which runs the entire ... by bogi666 on Wednesday, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:48:33 AM
went unnamed in your comment. I have my opinion on... by John Sanchez Jr. on Thursday, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:55:57 AM
both Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul fit the bill. ... by Dawn Owens on Thursday, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:24:39 AM
Sarah discovered early in her political career tha... by Doc McCoy on Tuesday, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:45:27 PM
Alot of this piece is satirical. What Palin did sa... by Anthony Wade on Tuesday, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:57:01 PM
you hit closer to the point about he electability.... by Anthony Wade on Tuesday, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:00:01 PM
I was responding more to those who have already re... by Doc McCoy on Tuesday, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:30:47 PM
due to the availability of diversfied weaponry in ... by Mark Sashine on Wednesday, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:37:27 AM
I think Fox gave a portion of the populace what th... by Anthony Wade on Wednesday, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:56:04 AM
"Sarah is not dangerous.  The people who woul... by Robert S. Becker on Wednesday, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:35:33 PM
You are correct in estimating Sarah Palin as an im... by John Sanchez Jr. on Thursday, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:36:15 AM
"How dumb can we be to pay interest on our money?"... by Ian MacLeod on Thursday, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:11:11 AM
 I would love to hear your comments. Sarah Pa... by James Murtagh on Friday, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:10:10 AM
... does not go nearly far enough. During the 2000... by BaronVonRothschild on Friday, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:17:10 AM
If you know a liberal who would vote for Palin i'd... by Anthony Wade on Sunday, Jun 12, 2011 at 3:35:02 PM
 I would love to hear your comments. Sarah Pa... by James Murtagh on Friday, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:07:53 AM