Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Biggest Red Herring Yet

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 7/20/11

Become a Fan
  (11 fans)
- Advertisement -
Well and good. New York Times reports today that there's a new deficit reduction plan on the table that has even resonated with Eric Cantor, though he "stopped far short of endorsing it."

This "compromise" aims to sharply reduce entitlement expenditures in the process of saving $4 trillion over the next decade. The president is "buoyed," the Times reported.

It's sort of like antichoice. Favor the unborn future over the living: the elderly, the disabled, veterans, the poor.

I, too, am concerned about the future and how we pampered baby boomers did so much damage to the economy. What about Bush 43? Oh, that's right. He's a boomer.

Good bye, Obamacare, no doubt. Unless the prez has struck a secret bargain to trade entitlements for health care. If so, they're all putting on a great act.

A quick fix will be necessary, but the "bipartisan compromise" is only four pages long now, and it needs to be two thousand pages long to qualify as legislation, correct? Even with the support of "staunch" Republicans? No way to add all that legalismus in two weeks. Oh, well.

Meanwhile, there's the deficit cap to increase, a yearly reflex nobody quibbled about until Obama took office.


Because the Republicans needed a red herring to throw into the face of Obamacare and job assistance and they're drooling over all that money in trust--Entitlements--that is no pejorative term. WE ARE ENTITLED to those institutions--Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid. I'm surprised that the GOP didn't come up with an offensive euphemism more appropriate to their ideology: "medicharity"? "senile security"?

- Advertisement -

Someone should remind the Republicans that there are Republican senior citizens, too, who will suffer from the spending slashes. Republican mentally and physically disabled citizens, even Republican poor people.

And, zowee, right in the midst of all the public outcry comes another despicable red herring, Rupert Murdoch, king of infotainment, to interfere with public focus on the debt crisis.

Watch that shocking yellow headlining dwindle once August 2 comes along and something or other happens to the budget controversy to save the United States from rocking the world into hell, nuking its economy.

Our entitlements are our bank accounts, our savings. Draw on them, gov, to continue droning Afghanistan on your charge account and to pay for having decimated Iraq--nothing left to destroy now: no infrastructure, but instead collapsing Halliburton-built drywall structures (if that) built in the name of reconstructing that poor country, to the tune of billions and billions of inflated dollars.

What a profit: $26 per Styrofoam sectioned plate in the mess hall. Uncle Sam treated. The soldiers couldn't afford it. How many soldiers' incomes would it take to pay a CEO in this country (paraphrase of an online query)?

- Advertisement -

The Republicans are not even borrowing from our entitlements--they're cutting and modifying them . . . to "strengthen them," Mr. President?

The whole issue surfaced as the latest round in the rush toward "neofeudalism" (not my coinage).

Let us toil, thrown out of "paradise," for pennies when we're employed and taxed to death, while the top 1 percent eat cake.

Next Page  1  |  2;

A jack of some trades, writing and editing among them, Marta Steele, an admitted and proud holdover from the late sixties, returned to activism ten years ago after first establishing her skills as a college [mostly adjunct] professor in three (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Smart Security or Dumb Dollar$?

Ohio Heroes On Path To Deposing Rove

There Is Life on Mars, Not Just Water

Review: Andrew Kreig, "Presidential Puppetry: Obama, Romney, and Their Masters"

Shall the Truth Set Us Free? (with a surprise afterword by Greg Palast)

Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear: Colbert, Stewart,, and Audience Sober Up


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

This "compromise" aims to sharply reduce entitleme... by Barbara Kuhn on Wednesday, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:04:16 PM
that was unclear? My flesh is crawling.... by Marta Steele on Wednesday, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:08:08 PM