Tags for This Article:

Government (3110)  Voting (1421)  Fear (1035)  Economic (1027)  Politicians (967)  Citizens (457)  Revolution (447)  Class (413)  Anger (110)  Suffering (96)  Arrogance (86) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...)  (less...)
Add to My Group
June 27, 2008 at 07:14:39

Headlined on 6/27/08:
The Audacity of Arrogance

by Joel S. Hirschhorn     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Anyone who doubts the downside of hubris should think of the losing campaign of Hillary Clinton.  Like cholesterol in arteries, extreme arrogance can block seeing political realities.

 

And Barack Obama is exhibiting horrendous hubris by, for example, flip-flopping on his pledge to use federal campaign financing for the general election and for displaying an Obama seal in public events that closely resembles the official presidential seal.  Welcome to the audacity of arrogance.

 

But there is a lot more to this Age of Hubris.

 

At least 20 percent of Americans are on top of the economic ladder.  Some 60 million people are not suffering because of high gasoline prices, are driving around in expensive $40,000+ cars, are living in sumptuous McMansions and vacation homes, have good health insurance, and are shopping in expensive stores and eating in luxurious restaurants that continue to do gangbuster business.  They keep buying the most expensive products ever made available in human history.  This elitist Upper Class benefits from the two-party plutocracy that through government policies takes care of them because the wealthy take of politicians.  It is very likely that the vast majority of Obama’s small donors are part of this Upper Class.

 

About 3 million of these people comprise the super-rich that fly around the globe in private jets and are driven around in limousines, live in enormous well guarded homes costing tens of millions of dollars, and vacation on their yachts and private islands.  They are members of the ruling plutocracy.

 

Meanwhile, the remaining 240 million Americans are suffering in a multitude of ways: millions lack health insurance and care, millions lack adequate food and shelter, millions more face economic insecurity and pain as they cope with extremely expensive gas and mounting food prices even as they increasingly recognize that enjoyable retirement is a disappearing dream and possible job loss puts them one step away from personal bankruptcy.  With rising economic inequality, the vast majority of Americans are hurting, which explains why 84 percent say the country is on the wrong track.

 

So here is the logical question: Are all the rich and affluent Americans feeling nervous and increasingly afraid that their physical security may be increasingly at risk?  Are they beginning to think about millions of suffering and furious Americans rising up in violent revolution against the status quo political and economic system?  Are they thinking about the millions of angry Americans who own guns?  Are they remembering that in human history economic slaves have risen up to openly and brutally overturn repressive regimes?  Do they contemplate a populist revolt threatening their wealth?  Do they ever think about another American Revolution?

 

Or are the rich and powerful thinking that all these millions of disenchanted Americans will continue to placate themselves by venting their anger on websites, participating in national and grassroots groups protesting societal ills, writing letters to newspapers and posting signs in their yards, and voting for politicians that promise CHANGE?  Are they thinking that the masses of suffering Americans are just too distracted by all their hard work and pain, just too dumb, or just too pessimistic about fighting the SYSTEM to actually take up arms in pursuit of happiness?  Are they confident that the police and military that THEIR government controls can and will protect them from violent revolutionaries?  Or, are they confident that the two-party system will continue to prevent open rebellion with shallow promises of change?  Do they believe that there are no limits to how the masses can be manipulated and brainwashed?  Hubris can bite you.

 

In the past I wrote that despite revolting conditions, Americans seemed completely unready to revolt.  But things have steadily gotten worse.  Not that long ago few of us foresaw millions of Americans losing their homes because of the shenanigans of the financial sector, millions of people facing daily pain because of historically high gasoline prices, and millions more struggling with rising food prices.  Lifestyles and quality of life are now tangibly impacted.

 

Support for change-politicians like Ron Paul, John Edwards and Barack Obama provide evidence of the populist pot boiling over.  The current presidential race and upcoming general election are providing a peaceful venting of pent up anger and disillusionment with unshared national prosperity, at least for those that still believe voting matters.  All elections offer is broken promises.  This electoral bait and switch is what the two-party plutocracy uses to maintain status quo stability.

 

The post-election period will repeat history as the two-party plutocracy in service of the Upper Class uses its muscle to prevent true and meaningful systemic changes to alleviate the woes of most Americans.  Even with Barack Obama as president.

 

What then?  Will there be enough energy left among the bitter, anxious and angry to spark a revolution?  Will people in this most violent and most gun-crazy nation on Earth finally realize that voting no longer works?

 

Will the horrendous hubris of the Upper Class and the lying politicians that serve them be proven correct, because Americans remain unready to revolt despite revolting conditions?  Will the suffering masses remain compliant and subservient, complaining and moaning, depressed and disillusioned, but not openly revolting?

 

You will decide.

 

Will you do more than vote, talk, read and write in the usual ways?  Will the Upper Class fear activists, populists and progressives?  Will dissidents on the left and right join together to fight a common enemy?  Or with horrendous hubris will elites continue to feed their greed through economic tyranny?

 

Let’s start the revolution by not voting for either the Democratic or Republican presidential candidate, but instead voting for an independent or third party candidate.  I recommend Ralph Nader, whose integrity and populist policy positions truly support we the people.

 

www.delusionaldemocracy.com

Joel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy - Fixing the Republic Without Overthrowing the Government (www.delusionaldemocracy.com). His current political writings have been greatly influenced by working as a senior staffer for the U.S. Congress and for the National Governors Association. He advocates a Second American Revolution, beginning with an Article V Convention to propose constitutional amendments. He is Chair of the Independent Party of Maryland.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 comments

Faculty member at University of Kentucky. Teacher, Researcher, social activist. Political independent who believes in better government, not necessarily smaller or larger government.
Peter WedlundFaculty member at University of Kentucky. Teacher, Researcher, social activist. Political independent who believes in better government, not necessarily smaller or larger government.

Audacity of Arrogance

Okay Joel, you're over the top on this.  If you read the Obama book "Audacity of Hope" you will quickly see Obama is a pragmatist, not a fire breathing liberal as he is often described.  To get elected you still need over 50% of the US electorate and the last time a looked the most liberal Americans do not make up anywhere close to a majority of the population.

Yes, Obama has started making decisions that are more conservative, more "like a typical politician" and that look less like the "Change agent" he defined himself as before.  That means in all likelihood he will NOT REPRESENT a radical change from before, more like a movement from the current "Conservative" path we are presently following to something reflecting a change in direction.  It will not satisfy the most liberal, it will anger the most Conservative but it will satisfy the larger majority of the population.

Many of the problems of the present administration revolve around "Common Sense" issues.  Just changing policies to reflect "Common Sense" would be great for most people.  We don't need to start unnecessary wars.  We don't need to tell everyone in the world what to do.  We need a government where the various departments actually do the jobs they were originally set up to do instead of performing political functions.  Government needs to listen to scientific experts instead of telling the experts what message they need to provide the public.  Over and over, many of the problems have been the result of stupidity and arrogance combined with the deficit of common sense.  The good news is that change is an easy thing to fix in the next administration.  Next, a change toward Universal Health Care would be great, improved educational opportunities for all and greater efficiency and accountability in government would help.

This does not require a liberal revolution, it requires a change in mindset.  Obama will not solve all the problems, but Nader will never be elected by a majority of Americans.  Voting for him will only dilute the message the country needs to send to Washington -- we want change.  It does not bother me a bit the change produced will be more pragmatic than extreme.  That change strikes me as more likely to be accomplished.  Remember, in the end legislative action also requires a majority of support by Congress.  That doesn't happen by railroading bills through and hoping for the best.

by Peter Wedlund (3 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 167 comments) on Friday, June 27, 2008 at 9:19:32 AM
 


Fulbright in 1966-67; Visiting Lecturer in American Literature with Baghdad University/Texas University Exchange Program. Guest Lecturer for the American Authors Lecture Series for the United States Information Service in Iraq.

Co-authored with Carole Chaney "Baghdad Letters" in 2003, a collection of letters and journals written in 1966-67 in Iraq.
http://www.amazon.com

Jay FarringtonFulbright in 1966-67; Visiting Lecturer in American Literature with Baghdad University/Texas University Exchange Program. Guest Lecturer for the American Authors Lecture Series for the United States Information Service in Iraq.

Co-authored with Carole Chaney "Baghdad Letters" in 2003, a collection of letters and journals written in 1966-67 in Iraq.
http://www.amazon.com

Peter, you don't address

Joel's main point about the plutocracy, corporacracy, oligarchy, that controls the government, including the President and Congress. The ruling class, the ruling elite, the very rich, whatever it calls itself is not concerned with who holds offices in Washington. This entitled minority of misbegotten elites has made the rules since before Marx and Machiavelli. The only loyalty they have is to their power and each other. They have managed to establish a sham democracy and a phony free market system, which aided by Bush's "rob the workers to pay the owners" tax plan, have gutted the economy and obliterated the middle class.

The Golden Rule: "He who has the gold, makes the rules."

by Jay Farrington (13 articles, 2 quicklinks, 9 diaries, 159 comments) on Friday, June 27, 2008 at 10:27:26 AM
 


Joel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy - Fixing the Republic Without Overthrowing the Government (www.delusionaldemocracy.com). His current political writings have been greatly influenced by working as a senior staffer for the U.S. Congress and for the National Governors Association. He advocates a Second American Revolution, beginning with an Article V Convention to propose constitutional amendments. He is Chair of the Independent Party of Maryland.
Joel S. HirschhornJoel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy - Fixing the Republic Without Overthrowing the Government (www.delusionaldemocracy.com). His current political writings have been greatly influenced by working as a senior staffer for the U.S. Congress and for the National Governors Association. He advocates a Second American Revolution, beginning with an Article V Convention to propose constitutional amendments. He is Chair of the Independent Party of Maryland.

Dear Peter

How sad it is to see people continuing to rationalize their political support despite the ugly reality that all they doing is supporting the political status quo and the continuation of the two-party plutocracy.  Ultimately, Obama will go down in history as one of the greatest con artists, taking advantage of widespread discontent with slick, sleazy rhetoric while silently taking big money from the same corporate interests as all the other corrupt politicians.  Boy, are Americans suckers for a big smile!!!!

Voting for Nader is NOT about electing him president; it is all about going on record as opposing the two-party duopoly.

Bet you were also enthusiastic about electing Democraps to Congress in the 2006 midterm elections.  And look at how that turned out: not even the courage to honor the Constitution and impeach Bush!!!!

by Joel S. Hirschhorn (127 articles, 31 quicklinks, 58 diaries, 509 comments) on Friday, June 27, 2008 at 11:36:20 AM
 


Writer from California
john de herreraWriter from California

our plutocracy

has compromised the electoral process by having their politicians flood the country with electronic voting machines, and since then, making sure none propose credible solutions like standardizing The Vote.

how is it someone like yourself who thinks, can gloss over the fact that we can no longer vote the change we need into existence?

nader? even if he was covered by the corporate press, and even if he could garner the popular vote needed to be elected, how would that be expressed? via proprietary source code? i don't think so.

by john de herrera (34 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 148 comments) on Saturday, June 28, 2008 at 12:42:07 AM
 


Retired NASA systems engineer for Earth Science data systems. I consider myself a citizen of planet Earth and consider Nationalism and other such beliefs which separate ourselves from each other are outmoded and are detrimental to the well being of the earth and all of the creatures that inhabit it.
Philip PeaseRetired NASA systems engineer for Earth Science data systems. I consider myself a citizen of planet Earth and consider Nationalism and other such beliefs which separate ourselves from each other are outmoded and are detrimental to the well being of the earth and all of the creatures that inhabit it.

This years election maybe the last hope for peaceful change

Four years ago I followed your suggestion and voted independant; and I feel guilty that my vote helped reelect Bush.  This year I will be more pragmatic rather than idealistic.  I will vote for Obama because I think he is electable; and I do not believe that any of the alternative parties nominees are electable.  The main-stream media will not allow any alternative parties to be viable.

Energy prices will continue to climb and that will cause food prices to also climb.  As people find their income being eaten by rising energy and food prices they will quit buying goods and services that are not necessary for survival.  Corporations will continue to cut jobs as their profits decline.  More people will be out of work with no jobs to be found.  This dire prediction is for world wide economic collapse; not just in the USA. 

I believe Environmental disasters that make Katrina pale in comparison will escalate; and like Katrina, the government will be impotent to help.  Unless action on global warming is taken immediately the government will be held in contempt for it's failure to act.

I believe that a government program to switch from fosil fuel sources to unlimited and clean energy sources (solar and wind) would provide jobs and reduce the costs of energy and that is the only real solution to economic as well as ecological collapse. To allow big oil companies the right to drill in protected areas is nothing but a ploy by these companies to continue on as usual and does nothing to solve the economic, energy, or environmental problems facing the USA and the rest of the world.

Will the Democratic or Republican parties continue on their path of courting big corporations?  I believe that John McCain will continue in the Republican way of support to big business regardless.  I also believe that the Democratic party has bowed to big business; but I think that Barak Obama will choose to do what is best for the American people and hopefully he will inspire the members of Congress to do likewise.  If the American people do not see real changes happening soon their despiration will reach a boiling point and their will be rioting in the streets.

I believe peaceful change is possible; but that change needs to happen very soon.

by Philip Pease (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 128 comments) on Friday, June 27, 2008 at 11:51:53 AM
 


Hater of Nazis above all. Hobbies include activism, military model building, military history, exciting and vital conversation with retired crooks. Retired
John HanksHater of Nazis above all. Hobbies include activism, military model building, military history, exciting and vital conversation with retired crooks. Retired

Audacity for ambush

Audacity is a military and criminal quality.  It is probably the only positive characteristic of crooks.  They deal in ambush.

by John Hanks (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1211 comments) on Friday, June 27, 2008 at 11:55:18 AM
 


Richard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.
Richard MynickRichard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.

I basically agree. I'd like to add that voting for Nader is

NOT about actually electing him, and also NOT simply about going on record as opposing the duopoly in a purely symbolic "protest" sense. 

It's also to contribute contribute to the tally of votes cast against the duopoly. If Nader plus McKinney plus other small left parties can get 6% of the vote this time, maybe they can build on that in subsequent elections. A rising count of votes to the duopoly's left can feed on itself -- the more that people vote for these options, the more freed others will feel to regard this as reasonable voting behavior.

Nader isn't my ideal, but he's very good, and clearly head & shoulders above the 2 corporate candidates. Voting for him is a very reasonable way (though not the only way) of showing support for Leftwards dissent.

by Richard Mynick (2 articles, 3 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 1173 comments) on Friday, June 27, 2008 at 1:32:20 PM
 


Michael Cavlan , RN, was an Official Green Party Observer for the 2004 Ohio Re-Count.
He was the Green Party Candidate for US Senate 2006 and is a Candidate US Senate
2008 Seeking Green Party Endorsement in Minnesota. See www.michaelcavlan.org

Michael CavlanMichael Cavlan , RN, was an Official Green Party Observer for the 2004 Ohio Re-Count.
He was the Green Party Candidate for US Senate 2006 and is a Candidate US Senate
2008 Seeking Green Party Endorsement in Minnesota. See www.michaelcavlan.org

Richard Myneck

i agree and that is why Cynthia McKinney has been my candidate. i also agree 100% with your analysis and strategy.

 

 

Ralph Nader will do nicely though. Progressives have two fine choices this year. Oh look and BOTH support IMPEACHMENT. Perhaps Mr Waxler or Mr Swanson or even PDA will endorse them. Unless of course, they have a SYSTEM to protect.

 

Nader or McKinney, your choice.

 

by Michael Cavlan (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 225 comments) on Friday, June 27, 2008 at 3:25:17 PM
 



Wolfie

I WILL VOTE FOR CECIL BILL.

He is the only one who has not lied to us!

He has continually said with a patriotic fervor, "Tooey too tooey".

He will deliver on all his promises. I guarantee it with a Tooey for C.B.

McBomb and Oblameless are talkin the Bilderberg schpiel.

But C.B. has no ties to the Illuminati. Why am I sure of this fact?

C.B. told me (tooey too too tooey) and I trust in his words.

Tooey canoe and up the gazoo!

by Wolfie (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 32 diaries, 1189 comments) on Saturday, June 28, 2008 at 1:32:11 AM
 


Currently I'm a cartoonist and contributing writer for The New Orleans Levee. For those wishing to view my work you can see my latest at: nolvee.com
Mr MCurrently I'm a cartoonist and contributing writer for The New Orleans Levee. For those wishing to view my work you can see my latest at: nolvee.com

Most aren't going to like what I have to say ...

It's over. And by that I mean this fantasyland we have been living in for the past 50 years or so. What we are about to experience will put survival of our species to a test and along the way billions will die.

End of times rant? No. Just plain observation.

It doesn't take a physicist to calculate that you just can't keep on taking and taking without putting something back. Eventually the void created demands to be filled and what we're experiencing in the beginning of a collapse of Biblical proportions.

Will the people rise in time to overthrow those inbreed elites that have for thousands of years pulled the strings to get us to this precipice? I have very little hope of this happening. The amount of ignorance of the masses is staggering.

The amount of denial even worse. There isn't a day that goes by I don't get ridiculed for my forecasts even though everything I've been predicting has come to pass. I could sight so many examples of willful blindness there wouldn't be enough space on this page to fit them all in. The lack of knowledge of history is beyond the pale. I would venture to say 50% of those 30 years older or less couldn't tell you who won WWII and an even greater number couldn't find America on a world map. Most people don't know the name of Edwin Bernays or the impact he had on our society. Mention Bilderberg and get blank stares. I was talking to a women that been teaching tax classes for 40 years and it was news to her that Federal Reserve Bank is a private bank. Do you think this women is ready to except what she's been teaching all her life has been helping a handful of umber-rich bankers to destroy the country she loves and is ready to enslave her and is totally illegal?

Mention secret societies and people scarf, they can't believe a relative handful of people manipulate all we do, how we perceive things, what we buy and how much we pay, but they do. People would rather believe they're free even though they're shackled with debt, fearful of losing their jobs and watch as what few liberties they have get stripped away.

We know our elections are a farce, yet rather than demand change people passively vote on machines that may as well tabulate their votes in thin air for candidates who treat them with disdain. People listen to politicians rail against war as said politicians vote money to continue war with absolutely no debate at the same time they gut quality of life policies. It's obvious they are lying to us, we can see that they play to to the lowest common denominator and yet people praise them. Calling such people delusional would be kind.  

How bad is it? Who among you would have thought that even 10 years ago an administration would hold meetings on torture at its highest levels and a General would qualify that we do indeed torture, that evidence of secret prisons, kidnappings and the deaths of 24 prisoners that we know of at the hands of our armed forces occurred and there wouldn't be a peep in MSM or in corridors of congress to even talk of impeachment? The most horrendous of crimes, committed in open are meet with a shrug. The fact that if you deny due-process to one you deny it to all doesn't even register with most flag-waving idiots. Those of us who do actually read and think are looked upon as freaks in a society that has been dumbed-down to a point that they refuse to see what is right in front of their eyes.

The best case in point is 9/11. Discussing this with a couple of dimwits a few days ago who refused to believe that there were no Iraqi's on those hijacked planes. When I mentioned 15 of the 17 alleged hijackers were from Saudi Arabia they both called me a liar. And these were older military men!

How does one deal with such ignorance? How does one fight against a vast propaganda machine where respected so-called pundits call for the murder of those that expose blatant lies and inconsistencies regarding a murder of 3,000 people in broad daylight that anyone with half a brain has to know was a false flag operation perpetuated to enslave us?

I've shown evidence to respected journalists that post on this sight who through their work have grown cynical to a heightened degree, who simply refuse to believe other than bush's official version even though they know there isn't another thing he's told the truth about. How does one deal with such twisted logic?

What will happen? I really don't know. I would pray that what I see happening is somehow wrong. That some unforeseen event or uprising will create a sea-change that would wipe the world of those sociopaths that have manipulated events that has brought us to this place in time. But until I see this happening we're in for a fall that will make all that has happened in the past seem insignificant.

Or maybe it will be as Pete Seeger once said, "A million little things will save us". I certainly hope so. And I hope those "million little things" aren't bullets, but until I see otherwise I'm going to have to believe the are.

And even if there were to somehow be a revolution we would next have to deal with damage we've done to this planet and figure out how to feed billions of people on a planet that is beyond it's ability to sustain these numbers. Not that we don't capacity to do this, but I doubt seriously we have the time or intelligence.

If you're smart you'll buy seeds, hand-tools, survival foods and guns, for soon every city in the world will be like New Orleans the week after Katrina for a long time to come.

by Mr M (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 12 diaries, 1442 comments) on Saturday, June 28, 2008 at 8:17:55 AM
 



Wolfie

YOUR LITANY OF LAWS

are no more powerful than the Constitution which is being used as

toilet paper. Go to bed and be a good liberal. Dream about what once was.

The reality is worse than we imagined.

by Wolfie (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 32 diaries, 1189 comments) on Saturday, June 28, 2008 at 12:23:08 PM
 


Bio moved to 'contact info.'
Levin SheridanBio moved to 'contact info.'

Agree...

Sometimes Wolfie, we agree... we are deep trouble.

Mr.M. Right on brother! Same for you Kimball!

I have been preparing a piece on the global economy and the bankers' plan... it will directly springboard off of this one.

I would call all of your attention to the Declaration on a One World Economic Order United Nations Resolution 3201/3202.

The global plan for plunder. It is in writing in there why our jobs are going overseas. It is one huge investment scheme. The largest known to mankind that benefits those in power to stay in power.

Fools in this nation are kept buried in political cesspool quagmire circus while getting their clocks cleaned and both sides of the aisle are on the take.

Americans have been sent up river without a paddle while those who did this run for cover in other parts of the world.

Americans have been put out on the limb while those who did it are sawing off our branch.

Be ready America to take a fall. You are on the edge of a cliff as I write this. Countries around the world are removing the U.S. dollar from backing their nation's currencies.

The dominos are falling. The U.S. elastic currency bubble is about to burst.

1913 to 200?. Print. Print. Print. In debt. In debt. In debt the nations of the world. Stretch those currencies past the breaking point and then profit from the collapse as has been done countless times in the past.

Bankers are the real enemy of the world.

KG

by Levin Sheridan (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 170 comments) on Saturday, June 28, 2008 at 2:12:36 PM
 



Wolfie

K.G. IS THE MAN!

You said it succinctly and eloquently. We is toast!

The main concern will be who we throw overboard.

I say women, children, and wolves take precedence.

Blub, blub, blub, .........

by Wolfie (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 32 diaries, 1189 comments) on Saturday, June 28, 2008 at 11:55:14 PM
 

 

14 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Documentation on Sarah Palin's IQ, Academic Record, and Job Performance Posted by Stephen Fox

Obama Must Appoint a Consumer Protectionist as FDA Commissioner by Stephen Fox

Bailout Fraud: Does the bailout pass the smell test? by Paul Craig Roberts

BREAKING: Florida Dems Told to Vote by Phone by Rady Ananda

Resignation letter from the McCain Palin Campaign by Robyn Crane

Aries Full Moon October 14, 2008 by C.L. Pagano

On Naomi Wolf's Sounding the Alarm by Dr. Dennis Loo

Johnstown, PA McCain-Palin rally, view it and weep for America by Ed Tubbs

Justice for black people in Georgia? Help stop Troy Davis' execution by Linn Cohen-Cole

What you should know about Barack Obama by miles mathis

Go To Top 50 Most Popular