Let us hear no more excuses for Barack Obama.
Let us hear no more defenses, no more special pleading, no more
extenuations. Let us have no more reciting of the "pressures" he is
under, of the "many obstacles" that balk him in his quest to do us good,
of the "bad advisors" who are swaying him to unworthy acts against his
will. Let us be done at last with all these wretched lies, these
complicitous self-deceptions that are facilitating atrocity and tyranny
on a monstrous scale.
Barack Obama has ordered the murder of an American
citizen, without trial, without due process, without the production of any evidence.
All it takes to kill any American citizen in this way is Barack Obama's
signature on a piece of paper, his arbitrary designation of the target
as a "suspected terrorist." In precisely the same way -- precisely
the same way -- Josef Stalin would place a mark by a name in a list
of "suspected terrorists" or "counterrevolutionaries," and the bearer
of that name would die. This is the system we have now, the same as the
Soviets had then: a leader with the unchallengeable power to kill
citizens without due process.
That this power has not been used on the same scale in the American
system as in the Stalinist state -- yet -- does not alter the
equivalence of this governing principle. In both cases, the leader signs
arbitrary death warrants; the security services carry out the task; and
the 'great and good' of society accept this draconian power as
necessary and right.
This is what you support when you support Barack Obama. It does not
matter if you think his opponents in the factional infighting to control
a bloodsoaked empire and its war machine are "worse" than he is in some
measure. When you support him, when you defend him, when you excuse
him, it is arbitrary murder that you are supporting. It is the absolute
negation of every single principle of enlightenment and human rights
professed by liberals, progressives -- indeed, by honorable people of
every political stripe -- for centuries.
There is nothing particularly remarkable about Obama's order to kill
an American citizen without trial or evidence, of course. George W.
Bush claimed the same powers. As I have noted here and elsewhere for many years,
our American presidents now claim the right to kill any person on earth
whom they arbitrarily designate as an enemy -- or even a suspected enemy
-- of the United States. Barack Obama embraced this power as soon as he
took office, ordering a "surge" in the "targeted killings" on
"suspected terrorists" in Pakistan. Hundreds and hundreds of innocent human beings have been murdered in
these drone attacks; many thousands more have been driven from their
homes, and terrorized into lives of mental anguish, their psyches lamed
by trauma, upheaval and the ever-present dread of death raining down on
them from the skies.
And of course, thousands of innocent people continue to die in the
wars of dominion and profiteering that Obama has so eagerly embraced. In
Afghanistan, they die directly at the hands of American forces --
including secret assassins who raid villages by night, often slaughtering civilians, even
those cooperating with the military occupation. As Obama's hand-picked
commander in the region, Stanley McChrystal, has openly admitted: "We have shot an
amazing number of people [at checkpoints and on the roads], but to my
knowledge, none has ever proven to be a threat." And in Iraq -- the
scene of the abominable, Nazi-like war crime of military aggression
whose continuation by Bush's "surge" was hailed by Obama as "an
extraordinary achievement" -- innocent people continue to die in droves
at the hands of the vicious and violent forces unleashed and empowered by the American
invasion and occupation, while they wait to see which brutal "hard
man" will seize power over their riven and ruined society.
No, the only remarkable thing about Obama's direct order to murder
his fellow American citizen, Anwar al-Alwaki, is its openness. A few
weeks ago, he sent his intelligence chieftain, Dennis Blair,
to Congress to openly proclaim the president's "right" to kill American
citizens arbitrarily. Bush had kept this claimed power obscured,
letting it out in dribs and drabs of directed leaks, and hints and winks
in public statements; but Obama has taken us beyond that, to the open
declaration and institutional entrenchment of the principle of death
without due process for citizens. This indeed is "change" -- with a
vengeance.
(And to think that only a few years ago, capital punishment -- with
its vast and cumbersome legal machinery -- was banished in America as
too unjust and arbitrary in its application; now a president need not
trouble himself with the slightest bit of legal process if he wants to
have someone killed. I suppose this too is "progress": more streamlined,
more efficient, quicker, more modern -- like wireless broadband. It's
simply there all the time at the president's pleasure.)
Now, there can be no shuffling, no waffling on the matter. Obama has
made it crystal clear for even the most avidly self-duping progressive:
He will murder his fellow citizens without trial or evidence if he sees
fit. The state can murder whom it pleases. This is the system we have.
This is what you support when you support Barack Obama. You cannot
escape this logic, this judgment. If you support Obama now, in this,
then there is no crime he can commit that you will not support.
And thus you become one of those people that we all used to puzzle
over, the accomodationists to brutal tyranny: "How did all those people
go along with the Nazis? Why wasn't there more opposition to Stalin? How
could they countenance all those obvious abominations? What kind of
people were they?"
Now you know. They were you. You are them.
**
NOTE 1: I should make it clear that I do not think that
it is somehow more heinous for the American government to target and
kill its own citizens, as opposed to killing foreigners by the
thousands, which it has done, on a bipartisan basis, for many a year. I
am merely laying out the case in this way so that American
"progressives" -- almost of all whom are deeply marinated in their own
brand of American exceptionalism -- can see that even by the standards
of this exceptionalism, which puts American lives and 'values' above all
else, Barack Obama is acting -- undeniably -- in a criminal, tyrannical
manner.
NOTE 2: While I was writing this piece, I got the
welcome news that Arthur Silber was back, after a long
hiatus due to his chronic ill health. And, as usual, his insights cut
straight to the heart of the matter. As I noted here the other day,
Silber was one of the very few writers who saw through the shining cloud
that surrounded the Obama campaign to the corroded core within. He also
noted the greatest danger of an Obama presidency: that it would
confirm, entrench, expand -- and normalize -- the worst aspects of the
American imperium, precisely because the system's crimes and atrocities
would now be presented in a more pleasing package, with all
"progressive" opposition to them completely disarmed by partisan
adherence to their standard-bearer.
Ironically, one of Silber's most incisive pieces on this subject was
provoked by what many people -- and almost all "progressives" -- still
consider Obama's finest moment during the campaign: his speech calling
for a "national dialogue on race" -- part of a particularly brutal
effort to knife his long-time friend, mentor and pastor, the Rev.
Jeremiah Wright, deeply and repeatedly in the back.
Go read the new piece now, and follow the links, which provide
chilling chapter and verse to underscore the insights. But here is brief
excerpt, one of the conclusions that Silber draws today from that early
speech:
If one truly and comprehensively
understood Obama's speech on race -- the unending, deadly lies on which
it was based, and the terrible consequences to which those lies have led
and the devastation they will continue to cause -- that speech told you
everything you needed to know about Obama.
1 | 2


