Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
1 comment

OpEdNews Op Eds

The 150th Anniversary of a Great American Myth? - You Decide

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

April 12, 2011 is the 150 th anniversary of what may be one of the greatest American myths ever concocted. On that day in 1861, South Carolina batteries fired upon Fort Sumpter and forced Union Colonel, Robert Anderson, to surrender the fort back to the state. Unfortunately, that is about all most Americans know about this event. Due to our long time lack of knowledge about this event, we have been willing to accept for years the premise that the firing started what is now called the "Civil War".

However, irrefutable facts about this event, if commonly known, would likely lead most Americans to a different conclusion. I want to get your opinion once you have considered these facts about the firing on Fort Sumpter:

1.        There were NO CASUALTIES incurred by either side as a result of the firing on Fort Sumpter

2.        Union Colonel, Anderson was WARNED IN ADVANCE of the firing by his former student and teaching assistant, Confederate General, P.G.T. Beauregard

3.        South Carolina originally owned the property but ceded it to the Union in 1828 for the purpose of defending the state

4.        The fort, on an island in the inner Charleston harbor, was VACANT when South Carolinians peacefully voted to secede from the Union on December 20, 1860

5.        In Washington, commissioners sent by South Carolina were ignored when they attempted to negotiate payments for Union fortifications that were made to the property they wanted back

6.        Once the people of South Carolina voted to secede from the Union, the fort in the inner Charleston harbor, was of NO VALUE TO THE UNION but was indispensible in defending the city of Charleston

7.        President Buchanan negotiated an agreement primarily with South Carolina legislators in Congress that he would not reinforce or make any changes regarding forts there and the state would ensure the peace

8.        By April of 1861, Union General Winfield Scott had drawn up evacuation orders for Fort Sumpter after Colonel Anderson transferred his garrison there in the middle of the night in conflict with the agreement

9.        By April of 1861, Colonel Anderson had sent communications that Fort Sumpter should not be resupplied and he offered South Carolina to surrender the fort as soon as supplies ran out

10.    In spite of all this, on April 4, 1861, Abraham Lincoln personally insisted on reinforcing Fort Sumpter and issued an order for a joint naval / civilian mission to send supplies and reinforcements to the fort

11.    When South Carolina discovered the reinforcement effort was in progress, General Beauregard had no choice but to fire on the fort and force an immediate surrender just as the supplies and warship arrived

12.    After Colonel Anderson surrendered the fort, South Carolina allowed his garrison to fire salutes to the Union before evacuating

So the question is, now that you know these easily verifiable facts, do you believe that the firing on Fort Sumpter could have started a war which left 620,000 Americans dead, more American dead than all other wars combined. Send me message. I would like to hear your opinion either way.

P.S.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Garland Favorito is the co-founder of VoterGA, which was established to restore the integrity of Goergia elections after the state implemented unverifibale voting statewide. He is also the author of Our Nation Betrayed, which, in its second edition, (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Still Looking for the Right Christmas Present?

New Movie Propagates Lincoln Historical Myths

Schaefers Killed with Mysterious Gun, GBI Destroys Evidence, Closes "Suicide" Case

THE KEY EVENT THAT LED TO UNCONTROLLED FEDERAL GROWTH

The 150th Anniversary of a Great American Myth? - You Decide

OSAMA BIN LADEN'S DEATH RAISES OLD AND NEW QUESTIONS

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

If the South had been allowed to secede, war would... by Jim Arnold on Tuesday, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:43:28 PM