Terry Williams: A Life in the Balance
State-sponsored murder is scheduled for October 3.
by Stephen Lendman
Human life is sacred. Throughout its history, US policy scored it. It shows horrifically in one war after another. It's no different at home at the federal, state, or local levels.
Policy makes human life cheap. Black and Brown people suffer most. Institutionalized racism denigrates them. In capital crime cases, most have virtually no chance, guilty or innocent. Officials don't care if they live or die.
America's death penalty is barbaric. It's the ultimate human rights violation. It's premeditated state-sponsored murder. No true democracy would tolerate it.
US-style justice is rigged to convict. Due process and judicial fairness get short shrift. America's unwanted haven't a chance. Innocent people get executed.
Others wrongfully get life sentences without parole. It's hard deciding which is worse - a living death or the real thing.
In 1972, the Supreme Court struck down the death penalty. In 1976, it was reinstated. Thirty-three states exercise it. Another 17 do not, including the District of Columbia.
Since 1976, 1,307 executions were conducted. Death penalty opponents call it state-sponsored murder.
In 2002, US District Judge Jed Rakoff said numerous wrongful ones are "tantamount to state-sponsored murder. Innocent people (are) executed who would otherwise be able to prove their innocence."
In 2011, there were 43 executions. So far this year, they've been 30. Will Terry Williams be 31? On October 3, he's scheduled to die by lethal injection. The process often is extremely painful. It constitutes death by torture.
On September 26, philly.com (The Philadelphia Inquirer) headlined "Pa. pardons board to reconsider Williams clemency plea," saying:
His earlier plea was denied. On September 27, he gets a second chance. His lawyers hope to persuade Governor Tom Corbett to commute his death sentence to life in prison without parole.
They'll also ask Common Pleas Court Judge M. Teresa Sarmina for a stay. She's "considering what defense lawyers (call) new evidence."