Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...)  (less...)
Add to My Group
February 3, 2009 at 01:02:06

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 2/3/09:

Tell Senate to Demand Whistleblower Protection!

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Jesselyn Radack, Posted by James Murtagh (about the submitter)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Posted by James Murtagh - Writer

Whistleblower Provision Must Remain in $800 Billion Stimulus Package: Tell Senate!

There was no whistleblower protection in the Administration’s unprecedented bailout of Wall Street. Last Thursday we learned that Wall Street handed out $18.4 billion in bonuses for the year with the money. Bank of America, another bailout beneficiary, just hosted a 5-day Super Bowl carnival.

    As the stimulus bill goes into conference this week, there were warnings of subtle but determined opposition from Senate offices to block key provisions of whistleblower protection.  The opposition is no longer subtle.  It's loud and unapologetic.

    The Washington Post argues that anti-retaliation and classified congressional disclosure rights shouldn’t be extended to FBI and intelligence employees, insisting "that is just plain wrong." This is a red-herring over an anti-leaks measure that controls preexisting broader rights for classified congressional communications, and independent enforcement for preexisting anti-retaliation rights.  But the FBI and intelligence agencies like NSA will, and should, be involved with creating a new infrastructure.  National security whistleblowers have revealed that their agencies play a role in all Americans' lives.  Why shoulld there be an accountability loophole?

    Whistleblowers tried to warn of the current economic crisis years ago, but they still don't have a fighting chance for justice when they challenge fraud, waste and abuse.  With current so-called "rights," their chances of winning are less than one half of one per cent. Studies consistently conclude that whistleblowers are the most effective weapon that exists against fraud. After the bailout, there is no excuse to spend another $800 billion without locking in accountability.  

    This reform has been languishing for 10 years, despite eight approvals by relevant committees, and four approvals by Senate or House votes. Three were unanimous. Why isn’t this done? The legislative process has been a broken record of procedural sabotage trumping an overwhelming popular and political mandate. Three times "secret holds" have blocked votes on this anti-secrecy reform.

    There was no whistleblower protection in the Administration’s unprecedented bailout of Wall Street--despite promises that it would be added "later"--and now we learn that a sizeable chunk went to pay corporate bonuses.

    In 1991, the RTC law following the S&L crisis had "best practice" whistleblower rights for its time. In 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley law wisely included whistleblower and witness protection as an enforcement cornerstone of that law.  Congress since has perfected weaknesses in these pioneer approaches in four subsequent laws, including three since 2006. A whistleblower provision should be included to provide teeth for any financial recovery bills to ensure that this crisis is never repeated.

    Secrecy was the breeding ground for this disaster, because it sustained the reckless decisions and corruption that caused it. Now the Administration proposes to give $800 billion--the largest stimulus in history--and theWashington Post doesn't want any accountability for how it is spent: no judicial review; no whistleblower rights; no public acces to records; and waiver of normal government contract rules. Apparently, one financial disaster wasn't enough for the Post.

    Today, the Washington Post has a lead editorial on why Senators should remove the whistleblower provision, which passed unanimously in the House, from the $800 billion stimulus package.http://www.washingtonpost.com/...  The editorial places form over substance.

    Regardless of what the Washington Post thinks is "the way it is supposed to work," how about the taxpayers?  We are in the midst of an  unprecedented, nearly $2 trillion spending frenzy. That is the wrong time to sacrifice justice for whistleblowers, and accountability for taxpayers, at the altar of the "right way."  

    Please call your senators and tell them to keep whistlelower protection in the bill! 

    Thank you for helping us make it this far.  We now must tell the Senate to include the same common-sense whistleblower protections in their stimulus spending legislation, which they're planning to vote on early this week.  Please contact your Senators at http://www.senate.gov/...!

    P.S. You can also send a letter to the editor of the Washington Post at letters@washpost.com, but it's more important to contact your Senators.

     

    Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
    Support Whistleblower Protection Act

    Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

    The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
    and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

    Contact Editor

     

    Book Recommendations for "Senate Committees Confirmations"
    A case study of Senate committee decision making: Confirmation of Nelson Rockefeller as Vice President of the United States
    by L. Lee Jones


    Number of pages:
    Publisher: Dept. of Political Science, University of Arkansas

    Confirmation Hearing on the Nomination of Robert S. Mueller, III To Be Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation
    by Committee on the Judiciary U.S. Senate


    Number of pages:
    Publisher: GPO, Washington, DC

    Confirmation Hearing on the Nomination of Charles W. Pickering, Sr. to be Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit. Hearing, 2/7/02
    by Committee on the Judiciary U.S. Senate


    Number of pages:
    Publisher: GPO, Washington, DC

    Confirmation Hearing on William French Smith, Nominee, to Be Attorney General. H
    by Committee on the Judiciary U.S. Senate


    Number of pages:
    Publisher: GPO, Washington, DC

    View All Book Recommendations

    Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

    FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

    Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
    2 comments
    To view all comments:
    Expand Comments
     

    House backs whistleblower provision in stimulus bill by James Murtagh on Tuesday, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:31:27 AM
    Join us at National Whistleblower Meeting! by James Murtagh on Tuesday, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:34:29 AM

     
    Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


     

     

     

    Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

    Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

    Powered by Populum