Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   18 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Tea Party Reminiscent of John Birch Society

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 5/23/10

The surge of the Tea Party as a potential shaker and mover of the American political system is reminiscent of a movement from the sixties that became particularly popular in the bellwether state of California.

The John Birch Society became active and many grassroots members attached themselves strongly to the national political figure they saw as an agent for change, Republican Senator Barry Goldwater of Arizona.

Forces quickly developed during the historic 1964 presidential campaign, which saw Goldwater ultimately emerge as his party's nominee against President Lyndon Johnson. As the first southern president of the twentieth century, Johnson engineered a landmark legislative breakthrough with the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

A strong ideological battle emerged that pitted Goldwater against major senatorial figures from his own party such as the stalwart of the then eastern liberal wing, Jacob Javits of New York, and Republican Minority Leader Everett Dirksen of Illinois, who had actively supported and voted for the milestone legislation.

Goldwater opposed the civil rights act. His stated reason was that the section dealing with public accommodations was unconstitutional. When some critics alleged that his vote was racially motivated an indignant Goldwater asserted that in 1949 as a Phoenix city councilman he helped lead the effort to outlaw segregation there.

Despite Goldwater's inner motivation, staunch racist elements gravitated toward his cause based on his opposition to the milestone civil rights legislation. At the 1964 Republican National Convention in San Francisco the situation became ugly, and in a forum where citizens throughout the nation had a ringside view from their television sets.

Strident and angry southern delegates behaved aggressively, treating major party figures such as leading eastern establishment Governor Nelson Rockefeller of New York with contempt, interrupting a speech he made urging Republicans to reject a far right intrusion into the Party of Lincoln with choruses of boos and catcalls.

During floor demonstrations African American delegates would be bullied and harassed. On one occasion hostile pro-Goldwater delegates set an African American delegate afire.

This open hostility calls to mind the angry Tea Party demonstration at the Capitol Mall when President Obama's health care legislation was reaching a vote. One angry demonstrator spat on an African American congressman. During that same demonstration an avowedly homosexual congressman was verbally assaulted with discriminatory epithets.

Could Rand Paul be another bellwether figure slated for trouble for his opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Act? While he can argue, as did Goldwater, that his opposition stemmed from deeply grounded constitutional principles, and it is known that Paul's views reside within libertarianism, the ultimate question is how these positions play out in an aggressive activist front.

During that same momentous election year bellwether California John Birch Society and other kindred right wing activists obtained the required signatures to place a measure on the California ballot to repeal the recently passed Rumford Fair Housing Act. The measure's proponents argued that, no matter how people felt about racial and other forms of discrimination, citizens had the right to practice discrimination if they so chose.

In a year when President Johnson carried California by a large margin over Senator Goldwater and scored one of the greatest landslides in American history nationally, the housing initiative passed by a wide margin.

After that the result predicted by most leading constitutional legal scholars occurred. The initiative was overturned in federal court, never reaching the U.S. Supreme Court.

 

Began in the journalism field in hometown of Los Angeles. Started as Sports Editor and Movie Writer at Inglewood Daily News chain after working in sportswriting of high school events at the Los Angeles Examiner.

Received a bachelor's in (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Koch Brothers Own Scott Walker

The Casey Anthony Photo that Dominates the Trial

Reagan, Deregulation and the Slippery Road to Poisoned Assets

When the CIA Overthrew Iran for British Petroleum

Did 12 Heads of Cabbage Decide the Casey Anthony Trial?

Fox News and the Dumbing Down of America

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 18 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

withstand scrutiny on the issues? ... by Bill Hare on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 12:48:11 AM
Tea Party be said to represent reform? Also, how o... by Bill Hare on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 12:49:23 AM
is a careful scrutiny of what the Tea Party repres... by Bill Hare on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 12:50:43 AM
Scrutiny is no one's ally. No individual or group ... by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 7:44:53 AM
but we are in apparent profound disagreement here.... by Bill Hare on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 1:54:17 PM
as long s the Sarah Paliners are the face of the p... by BaronVonRothschild on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 10:19:07 AM
review more closely what I wrote. Just as I point... by Bill Hare on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 2:00:31 PM
Bill - they are still well and alive: http://www.c... by Jane Schiff on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 2:27:23 PM
and yes, I was aware that they were still around, ... by Bill Hare on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 2:41:39 PM
in meetings with some really scurrilous graphics. ... by Margaret Bassett on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 8:43:22 PM
as well. The Young Americans for Freedom was also... by Bill Hare on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 10:51:57 PM
Bill Hare,Would you please cite the source about a... by Recce1 on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 11:35:55 PM
Bill Hare,I found one reference; perhaps you have ... by Recce1 on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 11:59:00 PM
but was the 1964 Republican National Convention. ... by Bill Hare on Monday, May 24, 2010 at 11:59:58 PM
Bill, I posted a correction immediately along with... by Recce1 on Tuesday, May 25, 2010 at 1:41:32 AM
help. This was such a startling convention that w... by Bill Hare on Tuesday, May 25, 2010 at 2:08:26 AM
Bill,As a conservative Republican, as in a ninetee... by Recce1 on Tuesday, May 25, 2010 at 3:00:27 AM
regarding the major parties failing to represent t... by Bill Hare on Tuesday, May 25, 2010 at 10:49:21 AM