General News

Taxation with Representation Finally? If Not Now, When?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 2/4/09

Become a Fan
  (11 fans)
- Advertisement -

                  4 February 2009: DC Representation in Congress 

Half a million taxpaying U.S. citizens in this country lack voting representation in the U.S. Congress. The issue concerns representation by one person who currently attends House sessions and is allowed to vote at the committee level, Eleanor Holmes Norton. The District citizenry refer to her as Congresswoman Norton.

On January 27, HR 157, which would correct this injustice, was discussed by the U.S. House Subcommittee on the Constitution.

Because the District's three electoral votes are always Democratic, the House has already determined that additional representation would be provided to the Republican state of Utah. But this representative would be "at large," rather than district-based, which would thus grant each Utah congressional district two representatives.

Analogously, DC Delegate Norton would retain her right to vote at the committee level along with voting as DC representative.

Wouldn't redistricting in Utah be more effective, in that it is done throughout the country regularly, mainly motivated by partisan considerations?

One subcommittee member told his colleagues that he planned to introduce legislation that would relieve District residents of the onus of paying federal income taxes. The motto on DC license plates is "taxation without representation," a line that Bush 43 had removed from the "USA 1" tag of his official limousine, a Cadillac.

It is easy to imagine that the idea of income tax relief elicited enthusiastic applause from the overflow crowd that attended the subcommittee hearing.

- Advertisement -

In this particular situation, unlike others, Bush 43 was upholding the U.S. Constitution A member of the audience attending the subcommittee hearing, a professor from George Washington University, noted that HR 147 violated our sacred document, which specifies that "the District is not to be considered a state except in cases related to individual rights such as those enshrined in the Bill of Rights."

To avoid Supreme Court involvement and the resulting expenditure of unnecessary time, a constitutional amendment is therefore needed. An alternative, another professor continued, would be retrocession, a move that would relocate the District back into the state of Maryland, where it was until 1790.

The amendment would require an assenting vote from two-thirds of Congress and three-quarters of the states.

The companion bill in the Senate to HR 157 was introduced by Sen. Joseph Liebermann on January 6 as S. 160, identical to 157 except that Lieberman would do away with Ms. Norton's no-longer-necessary function as DC delegate. She would become officially Congresswoman Norton, as DC residents have anticipated.

The most prominent representative present at the subcommittee hearing, House majority leader Steny Hoyer, recommended bringing HR 157 to the House floor based on the principle that residents of this federal territory are being taxed without representation, period. Here he is referring back to our Constitution's predecessor, the Declaration of Independence.

- Advertisement -

Certainly, HR 157 is not the first bill introduced in Congress to allow federal representation to the District. However, with such a marked Democratic majority in both houses of Congress, it is understandable that this latest attempt was introduced in the House a scant week after President Obama was inaugurated. Mr. Lieberman introduced his version even sooner. Score one for this benighted Democrat.


A jack of some trades, writing and editing among them, Marta Steele, an admitted and proud holdover from the late sixties, returned to activism ten years ago after first establishing her skills as a college [mostly adjunct] professor in three (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Smart Security or Dumb Dollar$?

Ohio Heroes On Path To Deposing Rove

There Is Life on Mars, Not Just Water

Review: Andrew Kreig, "Presidential Puppetry: Obama, Romney, and Their Masters"

Shall the Truth Set Us Free? (with a surprise afterword by Greg Palast)

Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear: Colbert, Stewart,, and Audience Sober Up


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 11 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Caesar issued the decree to tax the whole world.&n... by shadow dancer on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:26:48 AM
Egads, Shadow, I keep bringing up the America... by Marta Steele on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:25:25 AM
Just as in Africa before Zulu, the Native American... by William Whitten on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:02:02 PM
Thanks for that. I have a tough time believing it,... by Marta Steele on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:29:34 PM
As per your ideas on representation and taxation, ... by William Whitten on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:05:25 PM
Ron Paul wd. agree. Pls. let me know the rele... by Marta Steele on Friday, Feb 6, 2009 at 8:47:13 AM
I am not a Christian.  I do not belong to any... by shadow dancer on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:56:57 PM
Great worldview you have, Shadow.... by Marta Steele on Friday, Feb 6, 2009 at 8:51:48 AM
No, they do not have to live on federal land and s... by Gallaher on Thursday, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:26:53 PM
well we finally agree o something Gallaher, but it... by William Whitten on Friday, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:31:27 AM
Just Washington?... by Marta Steele on Friday, Feb 6, 2009 at 8:54:57 AM