![]() |
By Ernest Partridge (about the author) Page 1 of 2 page(s)
For OpEdNews: Ernest Partridge - Writer
They did not for the same reason that bank robbers don't hang around the premises after the heist. Rather than wait for the cops to arrive, they take the money and run.
Even so, I must confess that I was somewhat amazed at both the fact and the scope of the Democrat's victory in the presidential and congressional elections. For last August I wrote:
Better get used to the idea: John McCain will probably be the next President of the United States.
The fix is in, as it has been in every election since 2000.
This follows from two overarching facts that the corporate media will not report, and the Democrats choose to ignore: (1) The ruling oligarchy can not allow a reformist Democrat to occupy the White House. (2) They have the means to prevent it, as they did in 2000, in 2004, and as they might do again in 2008.
All other aspects of this "election" issues, personalities, media blitzes are secondary and perhaps even irrelevant....
[Accordingly], an Obama victory in November is unlikely. But it is not impossible...
To win at all, the Democrats must win big.
And that is precisely how they won it: BIG! R.I.P., Karl Rove's "permanent Republican majority."
And yet, most of the votes were tabulated and compiled in those unverifiable Republican-built machines and computers, with their secret software. Hundreds of thousands of eligible voters were taken off the rolls. Election watchdogs such as Mark Crispin Miller and Greg Palast fully expected these devices to be put to the same devious uses as in 2000 and 2004. Why not this time?
The Democratic victory in 2008 was, as usual, the result of several factors:
** The national media was no longer safely in the pocket of the Republicans. The internet emerged as a significant source of independent political and economic news and opinion. This time there were no "inventing the internet" and "swift-boat" smears from the Republicans, as the attempt to tag Obama with guilt by association with Rev. Wright and Bill Ayers caused no appreciable damage.
** The Republicans managed to nominate two extraordinarily weak candidates which, this time, the media took no great pains to whitewash. John McCain's stumbles and fumbles were duly reported, and Sarah Palin, thanks to Tina Fey, Katie Curic and Palin herself, became a national joke.
** Conversely, the Democrats nominated two strong and attractive candidates, and Barack Obama orchestrated a brilliant campaign. Obama exhibited competence, intellect and eloquence to a public that, at long last, was looking for more in a President than an amiable drinking buddy.
** The public had had enough of Republican lies and incompetence. Bush's approval ratings were in the basement. GOP propaganda had lost its punch: "fool me once..."
** The economy collapsed at the worst possible time for the Republican party and its candidates.
Given all this, yet another electoral "upset" like 2000 and 2004 would simply be more than the public would tolerate. The dirty secret of rigged elections would no longer be sustainable.
All that is old news. Add to these factors, another which, though scarcely mentioned, was, I believe, significant: the GOP, having successfully "starved the beast" of government and looted the public treasury, was in a mood to pack up and get out of Dodge. As any confidence man knows, the secret to success is to skedaddle ahead of the tar and feathers.
1 | 2
http://www.crisispapers.org
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| 1 comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |