Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   1 comment

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

THE "WAR ON TERROR" TEN YEARS ON

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -

Rome (Italy) October   13, 2011

Afghanistan and Iraq: the "War on Terror" ten years on.

The long, poignant period of reminiscence which led up to and beyond the tenth anniversary of "9/11", and, of course, the subsequent invasion of Afghanistan, could have been an occasion for objective analysis of that event's impact, and an evaluation of its consequences after a decade. Unfortunately the circumstance also gave rise to a renewed spate of statements still imbued with whining and/or truculent rhetoric, understandable perhaps in the immediate aftermath, but totally useless and, indeed, perilous today.

Few have pointed out that, by transforming what was basically a criminal act of enormous impact into an "act of war", our leaders   contributed to the creation of an authentic "Clash of Civilizations" atmosphere of which we shall continue to pay the consequences for many years to come.

The Empire of Japan's 1941 attack on Pearl Harbour was certainly an act of much greater international relevance and significance than the terrorist attack on the Twin Towers. Ten years later, however, in December 1951, I do not recall President Truman   officiating a ceremony on the site of the attack. For this reason I strongly fear that   by underscoring the "dastardly deed" aspects of the event, and thus fanning a generalised feeling of distrust and hatred towards Islam and its adherents, no progress will be made   towards what, in reality, ought to be uppermost on most peoples' minds nowadays: no longer "revenge", but "dignified exit" from a stagnant and potentially dangerous situation.

There have been some attempts at analyzing the mistakes committed by   the "West" after September 11th. It is difficult to single out the one greatest error, but it is easy to recall the sense of horrified disbelief when   "respected" western leaders,  referring to the ill - fated Afghan campaign, and, with even greater emphasis, to the totally unrelated   and unjustified invasion of Iraq, coined and used the expression "war on terror", apparently unaware of its irrationality and of the potential risks such superficiality entailed.

It is not without a sense of deep embarrassment that one recalls the   clumsy attempts made to equate the post 9/11 situation to the events of September 1939, pointing to public ignominy those who favoured "appeasement" with Saddam Hussein -- who had nothing to do with the attacks -- and subtly (and not always subtly) comparing the active western leaders to Churchill or Roosevelt, often getting historical facts   grievously mixed up in the process.

An estimated 100,000 civilian and over 6000 "allied" combatant deaths later, it would appear difficult to draw anything but a bleak picture of the damage brought about by the unbelievable hubris which   animated those who took such fateful, unwarranted and unwise decisions after the Twin Towers' attack.   The fact is that a military struggle so rashly named as a "war on terror" can never be won: the last terrorist will not appear out of nowhere, hands up shouting for mercy in the best Hollywood war movie tradition.

- Advertisement -

Above all, the assertion that, thanks to this military folly, the world is a "safer place" today is substantially false and totally misleading.

Indeed, the military action both in Afghanistan and in Iraq led to terrorist attacks in Spain, in the United Kingdom, in India and elsewhere, and if   greater tragedies have been prevented it is due not to the results of military victories but to the greater attention on security made necessary by a visibly growing danger of terrorist attacks.

The answer lies in trying to understand where all this has brought us, and to attempt to identify the least damaging way forward..

There have recently been several well targeted and certainly deftly timed attacks in Kabul, including those on the U.S. Embassy and the "C.I.A.. Headquarters", as well as the assassination of former president Rabbani.   These acts, carried out by the Taliban or by other probably more aggressive and better organised entities, are clear messages aimed at those NATO   countries most active in Afghanistan indicating that the time is long overdue for a level-headed, unemotional analysis of all the fundamental mistakes   made   both in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 shock and in later   moves aimed at enhancing the Western military presence   where it is neither needed nor welcomed.

The escalation of Drone attacks, and the building up of "secret" Drone centres in this and other areas will enhance the aggressive stance of the insurgents and   create a legacy of resentment which will endure long after   the actual fighting has ceased. As the balance of initiative keeps shifting in favour of the insurgents, and public opinion in the NATO countries   develops a growing hostility towards the expense and the human sacrifice this military action entails, the latitude for a satisfactory negotiated settlement keeps diminishing, and the unanswerable question remains on what the original "war aims" were to begin with and what they have in common with today's confused enumeration of asserted objectives.

- Advertisement -

It is astounding that none of the strategists involved in this ill-conceived   effort realised that by subjecting Pakistan to   attack, would be seen as an attempt to reach the very heart of Islam, which  for some centuries has ceased to be exclusively in the Middle East and has taken firm hold on the Indian Subcontinent. Just leafing through a book on the Mogul dynasty would have been enough, especially if coupled with an analysis of events tied to the   Partition of 1947.

The developments in Iraq, years after the infamous "Mission Accomplished" banner, are just as discouraging, and   have the feel of a disaster waiting to happen. It is enough to ponder on recent statements by the Shiite leader Sayyid Muqtada el Sadr, once very much in the limelight and now conveniently ignored by the media: His call to his followers to desist from   hostile activities until the final departure of the occupying forces is an eloquent indication of the obvious need to remain there for an indeterminate further period, during which inter-sectarian acts of violence will keep multiplying.

The consideration that these two military ventures have not made the world a "safer place" -- indeed, it would be closer to the truth to assert the contrary -- enhances the need urgently to find a way out, without being distracted by unrelated events and situations, particularly of an electoral nature.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

I am a former, now retired, senior Italian diplomatic officer. I have spent many years (over 25) in Central Asia (sixteen in Afghanistan).

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Vatican Scandals: A Never-ending Story

The Catholic Church and Italian Politics

Afghanistan: The Final Curtain Call for NATO?

Is Afghanistan Doomed As A "Failed State"?

Somalia's Transition. A never-ending story

Political Stability in Italy -- A contradiction in terms?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Some readers have been offended by  this article... by Carlo Ungaro on Tuesday, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:26:46 AM