Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Valuable 2   Well Said 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (27 comments)

How Could Bush/Cheney Miss the Warnings of 9/11?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 11 page(s)

opednews.com


OVERVIEW

Faced with the highest level threat in decades and severe warnings of upcoming attacks, President Bush, Vice-President Cheney and their national security team did not take reasonable and prudent precautions to protect the nation. The warnings were:

A history of al-Qaeda attacks, a Bin Laden declaration of war, and expert advice that the al-Qaeda network was the gravest and most immediate threat to the United States.

An unprecedented surge of warnings during the spring and summer that a major catastrophe was about to befall our nation. These warnings came from three Heads of State and a number of other close foreign allies.

The warnings reported that (1) al-Qaeda intended to hijack our aircraft and use them as weapons and (2) al-Qaeda members were here in the U.S. planning the attacks and learning to fly.

From the outset, the President did not give the al-Qaeda threat the serious attention it deserved. As the threat grew and became more menacing, he made no attempt to prevent the attacks, or protect commercial aviation, or inform the public of the impending danger.

Gross neglect of the threat and failure to prepare for the attacks had two adverse consequences: (1) it left our nation completely vulnerable and (2) made it easy for the 9/11 terrorists to succeed. Following the disaster, the President evaded any responsibility. Instead, he conducted a massive cover-up and allowed others to bear the brunt of White House mistakes.

The 9/11 Commission did not assess White House preparedness for the attacks, as required by statue. The Commission report focused on weaknesses and opportunities at lower levels of government and ignored those at the very top. The Commission's decision not to assess White House preparedness was never disclosed to the public or Congress. Its report omitted the urgent and specific warnings from Heads of State and our other allies. It also omitted a desperate visit by the CIA Director to the White House in July, when the warnings could not "get any worse", pleading for military and covert action now.

Discussed also are lessons learned regarding: (1) the consequences of disregarding a high level threat and personal responsibility, (2) how to remove politics from independent commissions, (3) the need to reopen the 9/11 investigation and (4) a suggested global strategy to reverse the threat of terrorism.

For a look at how the most advanced threat in U.S. history had developed into a clear and present danger, we begin with its emergence during the last two years of the Clinton administration.

TERRORISM UNDER THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION

The al-Qaeda threat escalated when, in 1998, Osama Bin Laden declared war on the United States and bombed two U.S. embassies, killing 224 people and wounding about 5000. Clinton became the first President to coordinate counterterrorism directly from the White House and have the chief coordinator report directly to him. The President responded as follows:

More than doubled anti-terrorism budgets.

Launched cruise missiles at al-Qaeda training camps.

Tried diplomatically to have Bin Laden expelled from Afghanistan.

Gave the CIA a death warrant -- covert authority to capture or kill Bin Laden and his chief lieutenants.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11

 

Burt Hall previously was Group Director, U.S. Government Accountability Office on national security matters. He served also on a congressional commission, similar to the 9/11 one, and with the Office of Management and Budget. He is a graduate of (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
27 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Hubris by Richmond Shreve on Tuesday, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:03:23 PM
A masterful web of deceit by gravity32 on Wednesday, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:00:05 AM
A masterful web of deceit by gravity32 on Wednesday, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:01:04 AM
"New Pearl Harbor Event" by Dennis Kaiser on Wednesday, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:20:04 PM
Step out of the FOG by bruce bowman on Wednesday, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:23:18 PM
Cheney's live war games on 9/11 as well by Lance Ciepiela on Wednesday, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:15:52 PM
Don't Forget by Dennis Kaiser on Thursday, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:11:53 AM
Lying media/government influence on author is in evidence. by Richard Lee on Thursday, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:20:37 PM
Too many warnings inconsistent with inside job by Perry Logan on Friday, Apr 9, 2010 at 5:49:20 AM
out of control? by gravity32 on Friday, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:41:43 AM
9/11 Cheney saw an opportunity by Lance Ciepiela on Friday, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:57:23 AM
No Credibility to 911 Conspiracy by Richmond Shreve on Friday, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:37:06 AM
only one piece of evidence by gravity32 on Friday, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:15:52 PM
How about willfull dishonesty used to provide Cheney cover? by Richard Lee on Saturday, Apr 10, 2010 at 7:28:19 PM
9/11 DNA tells no lies-explosives found in the dust by Lance Ciepiela on Friday, Apr 9, 2010 at 2:42:54 PM
All Debunked by Richmond Shreve on Saturday, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:00:39 AM
Richmond fails the test by gravity32 on Saturday, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:20:37 AM
Thanks !- You just demonstrated my point by Richmond Shreve on Saturday, Apr 10, 2010 at 2:16:24 PM
Keep up by gravity32 on Saturday, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:54:53 PM
Nonsense by Richmond Shreve on Wednesday, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:56:03 PM
Thanks Richmond by gravity32 on Thursday, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:50:09 AM
??keep up?? by Richmond Shreve on Thursday, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:17:51 PM
Not a paraphrase by gravity32 on Thursday, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:10:04 PM
Chandler's Convenient Omission by Richmond Shreve on Thursday, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:52:53 PM
Anothe Ignored Video by Richmond Shreve on Thursday, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:35:42 PM
No problem by gravity32 on Friday, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:01:30 AM
Prima Facie Evidence of Treason on 9/11-Bush Cheney Rumsfeld by Lance Ciepiela on Sunday, Apr 11, 2010 at 1:20:15 PM