Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   1 comment

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Sweetheart Tax Deal for Lockheed Martin?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Tshirt1_zpsd182e656.jpg image by b4peaceb4
New Jersey Peace Action T-Shirt by Madelyn Hoffman



Peace Action, nationally and in many states around the country, is working hard on the "Move the Money" campaign -- a national effort to pressure elected officials on all levels to support all measures that take at least 25% of the military budget and move that money into programs that address community needs. To learn more about the nationally coordinated effort, please visit the New Priorities Network website: www.newprioritiesnetwork.org.

One current example of the impact Peace Action's "Move the Money" campaign is having is illustrated by a situation with Lockheed Martin in Montgomery County, Maryland, described below. This is the latest development in a two-year effort by grass roots activists to change the budget priorities of Montgomery County to reflect community needs.

Here's Jean Athey, of Peace Action Montgomery speaking this Saturday about the latest developments:
"Lockheed Martin lost the battle in 2011 to convince Montgomery County's council to change the definition of 'hotel' so as to exempt guests at the company's luxury hotel from being subject to a 7% hotel tax that everyone else has to pay. Now, Maryland's state government is considering a bill to force the county to do so, and it looks very likely to pass. This is an unbelievable and outrageous example of corporate welfare, designed for one of the wealthiest companies in the nation. The bill is also an egregious example of state interference in a local issue and so further diminishes democracy."
Here's Cole Harrison, Executive Director of Massachusetts Peace Action,  

"Lockheed does not seem to care about the hotel tax so much as about the willingness of a local government agency to stand up against them."

Here's more from Peace Action Montgomery:


An outrageous bill has passed a State senate committee and a companion bill is being considered by the Ways and Means Committee in the House of Delegates, and we want to defeat it. You can read the Washington Post story about this bill here:   http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/maryland-senate-advances-local-tax-break-for-lockheed-martin/2013/03/08/0715b2f6-880a-11e2-999e-5f8e0410cb9d_story.html

What this bill does: 
 It will force Montgomery County to exempt Lockheed Martin's conference hotel from the county's hotel tax. In addition, it requires the County to reimburse Lockheed Martin $1.4 million for taxes it has paid the County to date for hotel taxes. 

Background: 
 Lockheed Martin claims that because this is a private hotel, it should not be subject to the lodging tax. In 2011, the company attempted to get the County Council to change its legal definition of a hotel in order to exempt Lockheed Martin hotel visitors from the tax. The County Council refused to do this. In 2012, the County Executive proposed in his FY 2013 budget that Lockheed Martin be given a "grant" of $900,000 to recompense this multi-billion dollar company for the hotel taxes it paid in 2011 and 2012. The County Council refused to go along. County residents testified to the absurdity of these proposals and to the unfairness of singling out one company for preferential treatment, at the expense of the rest of county businesses and individuals, who pay their taxes.  For more background on what has been a two-year fight, see article from last summer in Common Dreams:   http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/06/06-8   

The state legislature, in introducing this bill, did not go through the county delegation prior to presenting it, even though the bill will only affect Montgomery County.

Why this is outrageous:


(1)  It violates the sovereignty of local government--the County Council should have the power to tax in its own jurisdiction. Furthermore, the issue has come before the Council twice, and the Council refused to consider this special tax exemption. Moreover, while this bill affects only Montgomery, it wasn't even considered by the Montgomery delegation.  This legislation dilutes the power of local citizens to make their own decisions on things that affect them. This is a heavy-handed assault on the county. It's an insult to the idea of local government and of the right of the county to govern itself.  

(2) It is blatant corporate welfare for one of the wealthiest, most profitable companies in the nation, one that gets essentially all its money from the government.

(3) In a period of austerity for individuals and for state and local governments, a powerful company is seeking special favors. This legislation is a prime example of the power of money and influence in government.

Peace Action Montgomery is planning to fight this, but there is very little time. Here's what you can do:

(1) Join Peace Action Montgomery at the Capitol in Annapolis on Monday night, March 11th,  to pass out fliers, urging senators to oppose this bill. The senate is expected to vote on it in the general session that evening.

(2) Call your senator (or email if you prefer, but calling is best) and say that you oppose Senate Bill 631, the Corporate Welfare for Lockheed Martin bill:  http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2013RS/fnotes/bil_0001/sb0631.pdf

(3) Call your delegates and say that you oppose HB 815, the Corporate Welfare for Lockheed Martin bill in the House of Delegates.

(4) Ask all your friends and colleagues to do the same!

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Madelyn Hoffman is the Executive Director of NJ Peace Action, based in Bloomfield, New Jersey. She has held that position since August 2000. Madelyn Hoffman traveled to Afghanistan with Global Exchange in June 2005 and has given dozens of (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Fukushima. Hiroshima. Nagasaki. When Will It Stop?

The Peace Movement is Alive and Well -- and growing!

Reflections on What's Happening in Tunisia

Is the Iraq War Really Over?

The So-Called "Good War" in Afghanistan is Now "The High Cost War"

Can the U.S. Afford Another War?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Lockheed Martin has a demonstrated history of corr... by Michael Germain on Wednesday, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:13:02 AM