Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 6 (9 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   12 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Supreme Court to Women of Wal-Mart: You're on Your Own

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   News 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 6/20/11

Press Release; National Organization for Women

June 20, 2011

Today, a Supreme Court majority ruled against women by siding with the country's largest employment discriminator, saying Wal-Mart, essentially, is too big to sue. The brave women, led by Betty Dukes, who stood up to Wal-Mart at great personal sacrifice, are told simply they're on their own.

"With this decision, the Supreme Court has assisted Wal-Mart in its efforts to systematically dole out promotions and pay raises on the basis of sex. The law calls that illegal discrimination, but this Court has turned its back on the more than million women who only sought simple justice," said NOW President Terry O'Neill. "The women of Wal-Mart deserve respect and fair treatment, and we will continue to stand up for their rights."

Toledo NOW, with several area unions and activist organizations, organized a protest of more than 60 concerned citizens to advocate against Wal-mart's
discriminatory work practices, health care unaffordibility, pharmacy policy
of not stocking Emergency Contraception and allowing pharmacists to refuse
to fill medical prescriptions for women, May 7, 2005.  (flickr image  By Brave New Films)

In 2002, NOW declared Wal-Mart a "Merchant of Shame" as part of its Women-Friendly Workplace Campaign. NOW chapters have led countless community demonstrations at Wal-Mart stores around the country to educate shoppers about Wal-Mart's exploitation of its women employees.

Today, NOW demands an immediate legislative response to help the women of Wal-Mart. We call on Congress to pass the Paycheck Fairness Act, which would provide more effective remedies to victims of sex-based wage discrimination. This bill passed in the House in January 2009, but ultimately was defeated in the Senate.

"The gap between women's and men's pay is still sizeable, which is why it's so important to get this legislation passed," stated O'Neill. "We will continue supporting the efforts of Senators Mikulski, Cantwell, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, Stabenow and others to pass the Paycheck Fairness Act and hold accountable those who stand in the way of this sensible remedial bill."

A legislative remedy is only part of the solution, however. NOW also calls on Wal-Mart to end its unconscionable resistance to employees' efforts to form unions and bargain collectively over pay, benefits and other conditions of employment. Research demonstrates that unionized women workers earn better wages and have better benefits than their non-union counterparts. In fact, women in unions earn 11.2 percent more or $2.00 more per hour than non-union women workers. And the gender wage gap is smaller in unionized workplaces.

"The benefits of being unionized are significant," said O'Neill. "Women workers can gain a voice through a union that they could never have individually, ultimately making Wal-Mart a better place to work for everyone."

NOW.org  S upport NOW's Work

Subscribe to NOW's emails.

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Idle No More-- The Indigenous People's Revolution Begins

"March Against Monsanto" Planned for Over 30 Countries

Bernie Sanders Blocks Bernanke Confirmation... With Bi-Partisan Support

Bush and Associates Found Guilty of Torture

Statement of 911 Widows In Response to 12/25 Terror Attempt

Occupy & Tea Party Join Forces to Protest NDAA

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 people are discussing this page, with 12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

What horsesh*t is this?  When is the Supreme ... by Dennis Kaiser on Monday, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:45:05 PM
since 2000. Being a bloodless coup it have t be na... by bogi666 on Monday, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:43:19 PM
Lady Justice is looking more like Big sister ... by Donald on Monday, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:43:05 PM
start a union and....strike.... by Kevin Cody on Monday, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:56:58 PM
I haven't shopped at Walmart in years. We need to ... by Nancy S on Monday, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:59:31 PM
hhhh... by Rob Kall on Monday, Jun 20, 2011 at 7:19:29 PM
rrr... by Rob Kall on Monday, Jun 20, 2011 at 7:20:46 PM
llll... by Rob Kall on Monday, Jun 20, 2011 at 7:22:33 PM
... by MadAngel on Monday, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:51:35 PM
BUT NOT TOO BIG TO BOYCOTTKatherine Magdangal AKA ... by MadAngel on Monday, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:34:15 PM
Newsweek recently reported that both men and women... by Bob Stuart on Tuesday, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:08:26 AM
What a waste of 200 yrs of law and precedent and b... by Jay Nilva on Tuesday, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:21:23 AM