Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
12 comments

General News

Supreme Court hands Monsanto victory over farmers on GMO seed patents, ability to sue

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 7   Well Said 4   News 4  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 1/13/14
Become a Fan
  (9 fans)

opednews.com

Original published at RT



(image by Reuters / Darren Hauck)

The US Supreme Court upheld biotech giant Monsanto's claims on genetically-engineered seed patents and the company's ability to sue farmers whose fields are inadvertently contaminated with Monsanto materials.

The high court left intact Monday a federal appeals court decision that threw out a 2011 lawsuit from the Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association and over 80 other plaintiffs against Monsanto that sought to challenge the agrochemical company's aggressive claims on patents of genetically-modified seeds. The suit also aimed to curb Monsanto from suing anyone whose field is contaminated by such seeds.

The group of plaintiffs, which included many individual American and Canadian family farmers, independent seed companies and agricultural organizations, were seeking preemptive protections against Monsanto's patents. The biotech leviathan has filed over 140 lawsuits against farmers for planting the company's genetically-engineered seeds without permission, while settling around 700 other cases without suing.

None of the plaintiffs are customers of Monsanto and none have licensing agreements with the company. The group argued that they do not want Monsanto's genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) and want legal protection in case of inadvertent contact with the company's products.

The appeals court decision was based on Monsanto's supposed promise not to sue farmers whose crops -- including corn, soybeans, cotton, canola and others -- contained traces of the company's biotechnology products.

In a June 2013 ruling, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, DC said it was inevitable, as the farmers' argued, that contamination from Monsanto's products would occur. Yet the appeals panel also said the plaintiffs do not have standing to prohibit Monsanto from suing them should the company's genetic traits end up on their holdings "because Monsanto has made binding assurances that it will not 'take legal action against growers whose crops might inadvertently contain traces of Monsanto biotech genes (because, for example, some transgenic seed or pollen blew onto the grower's land).'"

The panel's reference to "traces" of Monsanto's patented genes means farms that are affected by less than 1 percent.

The plaintiffs asked Monsanto to pledge not to sue, but the company rebuffed the request, saying, "A blanket covenant not to sue any present or future member of petitioners' organizations would enable virtually anyone to commit intentional infringement."

Monsanto's GMO seeds are designed to withstand the company's own ubiquitous herbicide, Roundup. Recently, questions have begun to arise from the bioengineered seed's resistance to pestilence, which has caused some farmers to increase their use of traditional pesticides.

"Monsanto never has and has committed it never will sue if our patented seed or traits are found in a farmer's field as a result of inadvertent means," said Kyle McClain, the Monsanto's chief litigation counsel, according to Reuters.

"The lower courts agreed there was no controversy between the parties," McClain added, "and the Supreme Court's decision not to review the case brings closure on this matter."

Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association President Jim Gerritsen expressed disappointment that the Supreme Court reaffirmed the previous ruling, refusing to hear the case.

"The Supreme Court failed to grasp the extreme predicament family farmers find themselves in," said Gerritsen, an organic seed farmer in Maine. "The Court of Appeals agreed our case had merit. However ... safeguards they ordered are insufficient to protect our farms and our families."

In addition to Monday's news and the appeals court decision against them, the plaintiffs -- many of them non-GMO farmers and who make up over 25 percent of North America's certified organic farmers -- also lost a district court case.

"If Monsanto can patent seeds for financial gain, they should be forced to pay for contaminating a farmer's field, not be allowed to sue them," said Dave Murphy, founder and executive director of Food Democracy Now!, in a statement "Once again, America's farmers have been denied justice, while Monsanto's reign of intimidation is allowed to continue in rural America."

"Monsanto has effectively gotten away with stealing the world's seed heritage and abusing farmers for the flawed nature of their patented seed technology," said Murphy. "This is an outrage of historic proportions and will not stand."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://rt.com

rt.com is Russian television, which actually does a great job reporting on US news too.
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Senators terrified with abuse of Patriot Act's secret laws

Pope Francis shakes up Vatican Bank supervisory board

DOJ wants Bush, senior cabinet members exempt from Iraq War trial

Fracking Debris Considered Too Radioactive Even For Waste Site

"More destructive" than Stuxnet: Saudis and Israelis propose new malware against Iran nuclear program

Attorney General Holder under investigation on perjury suspicions

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The central bankers have bought our Judiciary, the... by Robert James on Monday, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:19:22 PM
Does 'support personnel' include slaves? ... by Charles Roll on Sunday, Jan 19, 2014 at 12:47:30 PM
This does not surprise me in the least.  Firs... by Sara Cope on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:20:14 AM
Maybe tons more constructive to acknowledge the p... by Otay on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:33:14 AM
So true Sara.  Congress has given Monsanto mo... by Suzana Megles on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:07:18 PM
Didn't you mean to say 'rise' up? ... by Mike Farris on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:14:01 PM
I just read the title and it sickened me.  I ... by Suzana Megles on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:00:14 PM
And how many of us realize the ex-Monsanto person... by Theodora B Crawford on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:32:44 PM
It is a sad day in America when crap like this hap... by Bill Johnson on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:02:36 PM
Now then, now then! We cannot have the World Ord... by Greg Greg on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:08:59 PM
Good reporting.  I liked "Monsanto has effec... by Ernie Messerschmidt on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:04:03 PM
  Good reporting.  I agree with "... by Ernie Messerschmidt on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:05:43 PM