Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 3 Share on Facebook 4 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (7 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment, 3 series

General News

Supreme Court Rally to Protect Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act

By       Message Marta Steele     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 2   Must Read 1   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 2/27/13

Author 8481
Become a Fan
  (13 fans)
- Advertisement -

(Article changed on February 28, 2013 at 10:24)

(Article changed on February 28, 2013 at 08:11)

"stripes and stars" by Marta Steele

Hundreds of demonstrators showed up early this morning in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building to participate in a rally protesting the likely Supreme Court decision to overturn Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.  

Sponsored by some sixty-two civil rights organizations, including NAACP, the Brennan Center for Justice, the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights under Law, SEIU, the League of Women Voters, and Rainbow Push, the all-day event began with a Congressional press conference from 8:30 to 9 that included Reps. Maxine Waters (D-CA) and civil rights icon John Lewis (D-GA), who were among those who attending the historic hearing.

Section 5 of the VRA requires preclearance from a federal court or the U.S. Department of Justice for new election laws in all or parts of 16 states with a history of minority voter suppression . Many of those covered states are in the South , as the VRA was initially passed in 1965 as a response to Jim Crow era suppression, and as part of the Congressional mandate of the 15 th Amendment, ratified 95 years earlier in 1870, to "enforce [the amendment] by appropriate legislation."

The majority of participants in yesterday's rally were African Americans, along with Latinos, Asian Americans, LGBTQs, and whites. Many had traveled from as far away as the deep South, including Mississippi and Alabama, said by one speaker to be the two states that had delivered the fewest votes for Obama in 2012 [fewest, with such large black populations?].

The rally itself, hosted by Joe Madison of Sirius XM Radio, lasted from 9am well into

- Advertisement -

the early afternoon . A post- hearing conference call with NAACP , LDF, ACLU, and the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under the Law was followed by a bus trip to Richmond by the Freedom Riders for Voting Rights, who had come all the way from Selma, Alabama, part of Shelby County, the now-infamous plaintiff in the case argued today, Shelby County v Holder.

A " post-argument analysis blog with legal experts and Alliance for Justice " will be held at 5:30 this afternoon at .

After three hours of speeches (more on these below), activists, including the Rev. Al Sharpton and Martin Luther King III, who had attended the SCOTUS hearing as well , emerged with their reports: the " ladies " (Sotomayor, Ginsberg, and Kagan) fought like hell , they reported , while one of the plaintiff attorneys argued that Shelby County should not be subject to Section 5 of the VRA because other municipalities have records " just as bad or worse ," Sharpton told the spirited crowd.

[An oft -quoted argument has been that Section 5 is no longer needed because of Obama's two consecutive victories; other speakers referred to this monumental event as a stepping stone in a long process rather than achievement of " the dream " itself, in a national climate that remains hugely discriminatory .]

Sharpton continued that Sotomayor, Ginsberg, and Kagan questioned why no statewide officials in Alabama, the " Heart of Dixie state " were black, with a population that was one-quarter African-American. In response, the proponents in the Shelby case noted during the hearing that, the state had indeed elected blacks to state office, if not state wide office, in a proportion reflective of the population over all .

- Advertisement -

Justice Scalia offered his brainstorm, calling Section 5 " racial entitlement ." But even worse, continued Sharpton, he " loses his soul " when he sees Clarence (" er, Justice Thomas ," he quickly added).

Sharpton offered no conclusive predictions on the final outcome of the case, to be published this summer,  suggesting he couldn't predict in which direction the almost certain 5-4 decision would fall either way. Justice Kennedy is believed to be the lone swing vote in the case .

And if Section 5 is struck down, Sharpton continued, "we'll go back to the streets ," the way we first got the VRA. Our forebears suffered and died -- we won't lose that , he said .

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


- Advertisement -

Well Said 2   Must Read 1   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Marta Steele is an author/editor/blogger who has been writing for since 2006. She is also author of the 2012 book "Grassroots, Geeks, Pros, and Pols: The Election Integrity Movement's Nonstop Battle to Win Back the People's Vote, (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Heads Up! Bernie to Be Interviewed on MSNBC 9 pm Tonight with "Exciting" News

Review: Andrew Kreig, "Presidential Puppetry: Obama, Romney, and Their Masters"

Ohio Heroes On Path To Deposing Rove

Smart Security or Dumb Dollar$?

There Is Life on Mars, Not Just Water

Shall the Truth Set Us Free? (with a surprise afterword by Greg Palast)