Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   16 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Sunday Homily: Pope Francis & St. Peter -- Throwing Rocks at Empire Then and Now

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H4 6/29/14

Become a Fan
  (24 fans)

Stone Thrower in the West Bank
(image by jpeg

Readings for the Solemnity of Sts. Peter and Paul: Acts 12: 1-11; PS 34: 2-9; 2TM 4: 6-8, 17-18; MT 16: 13-19,

Pope Francis is at it again. He's throwing stones at the U.S. Empire. (Details to follow.) Today's liturgy of the word tells us that in doing so Francis is following in the footsteps of St. Peter, the" rock-thrower" of whom tradition tells us Pope Francis the successor.

Selections in today's lectionary promise that joining Francis and Peter in their resistance to empire, while accepting the mysterious keys to God's kingdom can release us from even the most impregnable imperial prison. This should give all of us encouragement as we struggle against the powerful "beast" whose policies would rather see behind bars people like Francis, Peter and many reading this homily.

To begin with, think about our prophet-pope. Three weeks ago, he reaffirmed what has become a theme of his papacy. Without mentioning the United States by name, he condemned the economic system "America" and its European partners champion.

He also condemned the wars the U.S. prosecutes and weaponizes. According to the pope, far from advancing freedom or democracy, the purpose of such war is to maintain a system of greed based on the worship of money. As such, that system is the cause of scandalous inequalities and unemployment across the globe -- even as exposed by French economist, Thomas Picketty in his best-selling Capitalism in the Twenty-first Century.

Here are the pope's actual words:

"We discard a whole generation to maintain an economic system that no longer endures -- a system that to survive has to make war, as the big empires have always done. But since we cannot wage the Third World War, we make regional wars. And what does that mean? That we make and sell arms. And with that the balance sheets of the idolatrous economies -- the big world economies that sacrifice man at the feet of the idol of money -- are obviously cleaned up."

As indicated earlier, those words can be understood as following the anti-imperial rock-throwing tradition of Simon the apostle. After all the nom de guerre of that particular insurgent was "Peter," a name some say meant "rock-thrower" -- probably a reference to his prowess at hurling stones at Roman soldiers who occupied his homeland of Galilee. Peter was an insurgent not unlike those who have plagued U.S. misadventures in Iraq and Afghanistan. In today's gospel, Matthew turns rock-throwing into an anti-imperial metaphor describing the foundation of the Jesus Movement.

The evangelist does so by having Jesus raise three Socratic questions about God's reign contrasted with Caesar's -- always the focus of Jesus' teaching.

Jesus' first question sets an "apocalyptic" tone for the other two. The question represents a marker telling us that what follows will be highly political -- a criticism of the imperial order Jesus and his friends found it so painful to live under. (The literary form "apocalypse" always entailed critique of empire.)

So the carpenter-rabbi asks, "Who do people say the 'Son of Man' is?" The question refers us, not to Jesus, but to a revolutionary character introduced in the Book of Daniel -- written during the occupation of Palestine under the Greek emperor, Antiochus IV Epiphanes. Daniel's character was "the Human One." The book's author sets that figure in sharp contrast to "the Beasts" (including a lion, a leopard and an iron-toothed dragon) who represent the imperial oppressors of Israel from the Egyptians through the Assyrians, Babylonians, Medes, Persians, and Greeks. In Jesus' context, the Roman occupiers were the latest bestial incarnation. Everyone knew that.

According to Daniel's author, the Human One would establish God's compassionate (humanistic) order destined to replace all savage imperial arrangements. The resulting Kingdom would be friendly not to the royalty, the generals, "our troops," or the 1%, but to those the biblical tradition identifies as God's favorites -- the widows, orphans, and undocumented foreigners. (This Sunday's responsorial psalm calls such people the poor, the lowly, fearful, ashamed and distressed. They are the ones, the responsorial says, whom God can be counted on to rescue.)

In answer to Jesus' question about the Son of Man's identity, his disciples answer, "Some say he was John the Baptist, others Elijah, still others Jeremiah or one of the prophets."

Then Jesus asks, "what about me? Who do you think I am in the apocalyptic context I've just set.

Not surprisingly, Peter takes the bait. "You are the messiah," he responds, "the Son of God." With these words, the Jewish fisherman is not making a scholar's metaphysical statement about Jesus' "consubstantiality" with "the Father." Rather, he's distinguishing Jesus from the Roman emperor -- the most prominent claimant to the titles, "Messiah" and "Son of God." Yes, both "Messiah" and "Son of God" were imperial titles. Everyone knew that too.

This makes Peter's statement highly political. It identifies Jesus as the true head of the New Order which prophets like John the Baptist, Elijah and Jeremiah painted as the Dream of God. In words more relevant to our own time, Peter's "confession of faith" is like saying "You, Jesus, are the real President, and your order has nothing to do with the United States or 'America.' In fact, it turns the values of empires -- be they Rome or the United States -- completely on their heads."

Next Page  1  |  2


Mike Rivage-Seul is a liberation theologian and former Roman Catholic priest. Recently retired, he taught at Berea College in Kentucky for 36 years where he directed Berea's Peace and Social Justice Studies Program.Mike blogs (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Sunday Homily: Pope Francis to Women: The Next Pope Should Be One of You!

"Cloud Atlas": A Film for the Ages (But perhaps not for ours)

The Case for and Intimate Relationship between Jesus and Mary Magdalene

What You Don't Know About Cuba Tells You About YOUR Future

Sunday Homily: Pope Francis' New Song -- Seven Things You May Have Missed in 'The Joy of the Gospel'

The Advent Project of Pope Francis (and Jesus): A World without War by Christmas! (Sunday Homily)


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

For almost 2000 years, the familiar words, "Thou ... by Mike Rivage-Seul on Sunday, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:00:03 AM
What Francis says is nice, but the same article yo... by Michael David Morrissey on Sunday, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:59:31 AM
Michael: I'm not sure I would refer to the present... by Mike Rivage-Seul on Sunday, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:04:38 AM
Mike: Just to take one of the people you mention, ... by Michael David Morrissey on Monday, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:36:59 AM
Dear Michael, I was just trying to make the point ... by Mike Rivage-Seul on Sunday, Jul 6, 2014 at 12:18:20 PM
I have always been perplexed by the two terms or t... by Charles Roll on Sunday, Jun 29, 2014 at 3:48:01 AM
Charles: Two things: (1) I consider the terms "Son... by Mike Rivage-Seul on Sunday, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:21:33 AM
One of the things that has kept me from reading "... by Michael David Morrissey on Monday, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:06:58 AM
Charles, please excuse me for apparently ignoring ... by Mike Rivage-Seul on Sunday, Jul 6, 2014 at 12:08:43 PM
Thanks, Mike. I am going to read your 8-page homil... by Michael David Morrissey on Monday, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:00:19 AM
Thanks for linking to PCH's response to your artic... by Charles Roll on Wednesday, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:13:12 PM
Thanks, Charles. PCR came through with flying colo... by Michael David Morrissey on Thursday, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:26:50 AM
Mike,You seem to be mixing me up with Micheal Davi... by Charles Roll on Wednesday, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:07:35 PM
Wow: "distinguished writer." Self-published is mor... by Michael David Morrissey on Thursday, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:48:50 AM
And the Catholic Church, headed by Francis, is a s... by Michael David Morrissey on Monday, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:39:04 AM
I agree with you that God is on our side. I agree ... by E. J. N. on Wednesday, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:06:38 PM