Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
2 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Stupid Public Policies and Other Political Myths: Ideas that President Obama should Avoid

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

"Stupid is as stupid does." So said Forrest Gump in referring to how stupid individuals do stupid things. Yet governments also do stupid things. President elect Barack Obama’s $800 billion+ plan to stimulate the American economy raises a host of interesting questions about how to achieve the "biggest bang for the biggest buck." Are some types of projects better than others to stimulating the economy?

Governments often adopt many ideas that social science evidence tells us that don’t work. Like bad meals that forever repeat, or a vampire who never dies, these ideas too are recycled and never seem to go away.

As Congress and the Obama administration contemplate spending billions on economic development, here are four ideas that should be avoided.

Tax incentives are needed to encourage business relocation decisions. At the top of any list of political myths is the idea that businesses make decisions about where to locate based primarily or perhaps even exclusively upon taxes.

The economic literature is clear—tax breaks to encourage economic relocation are economically inefficient and wasteful. Hundreds of studies reach this conclusion. When businesses are surveyed regarding factors important to their economic [re]location, taxes often come in way behind proximity to markets, suppliers, and the quality of the labor force. These other factors occupy a larger percentage of a business’s budget than do taxes, and all of them are far more critical to long term success than are taxes. Businesses occasionally admit this. Nearly 62% of those interviewed in a California study on hiring tax credits indicated that they had never or rarely affected their decision to employ individuals. In the same study, nearly half stated that tax incentives for relocation did not affect their decisions. Tax incentives reward businesses for decisions they were already going to make. Bottom line: Tax incentives are inefficient and wasteful.

Enterprise zones are an efficient means to encourage economic development. Enterprise zones were developed to revitalize depressed areas that were lacking in investment or job production. Much of the logic of enterprise zones relies upon the same assumptions of using tax incentives for business relocations. But in the case of enterprise zones, there is an identified geographic region which is deemed to be economically disadvantaged or needing special help.

Tax incentives, along with perhaps infrastructure assistance, are supposed to induce businesses to relocate into the enterprise zone, thereby bringing with jobs and all the benefits associated with their move. While elegant in theory, how have enterprise zones really worked? Bottom line: They are generally a cost ineffective failure in encouraging economic development and in producing meaningful employment opportunities. At best, they move jobs from one community to another, robbing Peter to pay Paul.

Public subsidies for sports stadia are a good economic development strategy. Should a city or community fund the construction of a new sports stadium in order to stimulate economic development? The overwhelming evidence is that the public use of tax dollars for a sports stadium is economically inefficient and a bad investment that produces no real net economic benefit to a community. Bottom line: Professional sports actually are a small portion of a local economy compared to the arts, and the jobs produced, except for the overpaid athletes, are low wage and few when compared to how the same money invested elsewhere can produce better results.

The building of convention and other entertainment centers are successful tools for economic development. The 1989 baseball movie Field of Dreams is famously known for a voice echoing "If you build it they will come." This line captures a theory of urban economic development that places an emphasis upon the building of convention and entertainment centers as a spur to economic development. Does the building of these facilities to promote tourism alone revitalize an urban core or area economy? The simple answer is no. There are many reasons why the convention-entertainment center/tourism strategy has been unsuccessful. First, so many communities built these types of centers that they cancelled one another out. A second and more fundamental reason behind the failure of the "if you build it" philosophy is premised in the belief that a single factor makes an urban center economically viable. Bottom line: There is no quick fix to development, and convention centers are a poor way to revitalize economies.

Overall, spent well, $850 billion can help the economy. Yet any spending should be guided not by stupidity and myth but by social science evidence that informs policy makers what does and does not work.

 

http://davidschultz.efoliomn2.com/

David Schultz is Hamline University professor in the Graduate School of Management where he teaches classes in government ethics, public policy, and public administration. He also holds appointments in the Hamline University Department of Criminal (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Marx, Globalization, and the Death of Neo-Liberalism

Death and Dying on Wall Street:: The End of the Reagan Era

The Moral Crisis of the Republican Party

Stupid Public Policies and Other Political Myths: Ideas that President Obama should Avoid

What is Orthodox Republicanism?

Miranda Warnings and the Boston Marathon Bomber: Why Obama is Wrong

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

David Schultz makes points that fit with my unders... by Jim Pivonka on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 9:00:40 AM
What's right is right, what's wrong is wro... by STEVE RISK on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 1:32:44 PM