OpEdNews Op Eds

String 'em up

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (1 fan)
- Advertisement -
BODY {font-family="Arial"} TT {font-family="Courier New"} BLOCKQUOTE.CITE {padding-left:0.5em; margin-left:0; margin-right:0; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; border-left:"solid 2";}


by Jerry Lobdill
6/3/2009

Beginning when Bill Clinton lied in his campaign promise to veto NAFTA, this nation has gone down a primrose path to certain destruction.  I'm no Nobel Prize winning economist, but I recognized the peril when we started off down the steep path to our doom, and I screamed about it then (1992).  I sent my concerns to Robert Reich, then Clinton's Labor Secretary. I was criticizing his book, "The Work of Nations", which was the work of a traitor, as it turns out. I got back a personally signed letter typical of those sent by politicians who are hell bent on doing the opposite of whatever the constituent thinks is right. But, hey, he was joined in his deliberate scuttling of the US by Paul Krugman, who did receive the Nobel Prize last year.  And the NYT bought into the pitch on globalization as well.

Now, in an editorial titled "The Peril of Buy American", (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/03/opinion/03weds1.html?th&emc=th) the New York Times is bringing up the reasons why we can't save ourselves, pointing out that we no longer are sovereign in our ability to make choices that are necessary to save this nation. Guess what? They have discovered that we no longer can produce steel or make other materials such as vinyl pipe since we have gone down the road to dependence on other countries for our national security while chanting the mantra that "protectionism" is evil. Yes sir, the
New York Times says we are in peril if we decide to make our own materials.

Yesterday, Reich had the temerity to resurrect his idiotic theory that the US is going to be fine, because we are all going to prosper by becoming "symbolic analysts" and will no longer have to depend on producing anything at all for our daily bread.  Let the peons in the third world furnish us all the goods we must buy with that high dollar income we're going to make as symbolic analysts. I went to his blog to register my disgust and found that 133 others had beat me to it. In a quick scan I didn't find a single message supporting his nonsense. The b*!@#$d ought to be hung, drawn, and quartered as a traitor. (And that goes for all his co-conspirators as well).

The fallacy lies in the deliberate misapplication of David Riccardo's 18th century unrealistic theory of comparative advantage, in which sovereign nations decide to become interdependent by using the different labor costs in the nations as a criterion for deciding who will produce what for all the nations while importing all other needs from the other members of the consortium. In theory, each country specializes in production according to the ranking of the production costs of different products in different nations, and all nations benefit because they get all their needs met at the cheapest price. As a theory it was great, but it was totally at odds with other small considerations such as national security, the reality of shifting alliances among nations, human nature...you know, little details like those.
- Advertisement -


I have pointed out this fallacy to Krugman, and he has totally ignored me while continuing to support this patently disastrous theory. String him up too.

As Stan Rogers so aptly put it in his "Barrett's Privateers",

"God damn them all! I was told
We'd cruise the seas for American gold.
We'd fire no shots, shed no tears.
Now I'm a broken man on a Halifax pier,
The last of Barrett's privateers."
- Advertisement -

 

http://www.LastTrain2ElPaso.com

I am a retired physicist and hold a B.S. in Ch. E. as well. I have been an environmental activist since the early 1970s. I have been a writer of opinion pieces and other essays since about 1995 and am a published author of history. I have (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

"Small is Beautiful-Economics as if People Mattered"

The looming crisis of the death of Windows XP

Currency in Fiat Monetary Systems in General and the US Federal Reserve System in Particular

The Trouble With Cash--a World Awash in $100 Federal Reserve Notes

We have been transformed into a pathocracy--Political Ponerology, a must read

Dear PayPal

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
In what was has globalization failed? Seeing it is... by john riggs on Friday, Jun 5, 2009 at 8:56:50 PM