Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Stealing The Election 2.0

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Group(s): , Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 2/4/13

I spent a lot Jan 21 with tears of joy and pride in my eyes, watching the second inauguration of President Barack Obama, surprised by the depth of my own emotion.   I was proud of our President, and prouder of our country, once again demonstrating the overarching exercise of democracy in the peaceful transition (or in this case continuation) of power.   What a country!  

But even as I watched today, I was aware that this may be the last fair election of my lifetime -- and the last time a Democrat wins the Presidency.   Because one thing you have to admire about Republicans -- they do not give up.   They have a new plan for permanently assuring their supremacy despite the wishes of the great majority of Americans -- and this one looks pretty foolproof.   They aim to rig the Electoral College.   This post is long -- but it is urgent.   Please keep reading, because if they succeed -- game over.

My last column addressed the question of "what do Republicans teach their children?"   I questioned whether Republican children are being taught about sportsmanship, fair play and honesty, in light of the behavior of their candidates in this last election.   I ask the question again, in light of the Republicans' new strategies for winning the Presidency.   Put simply, if you can't win by following the rules -- change the rules.   And, make sure the new rules permanently tilt the playing field as steeply as possible in your favor.   Fairness?   Sportsmanship? Having better policies?   Winnng the majority of the population? Bah, humbug.

In this past election, it became clear that Republicans are a shrinking party due to their exclusionary view of the world.   They have actively rejected minorities, women, gays, students, seniors, and immigrants.   There isn't much left -- certainly not a national majority.   So, if you don't have the numbers to win, and you won't change your positions -- then you have to reduce the other guy's numbers. Therefore, we saw many and varied plans crop up for voter suppression.   Here in PA, Republicans attempted to limit the democratic vote through their oppressive Voter ID law, which targeted traditionally democratic constituencies.   Thankfully, we still have a court system that understands what democracy means, and the Voter ID law was temporarily blocked in PA.

So, now we have Steal the Presidency, 2.0.

The new plan is actually breath-takingly ingenious.   Republicans started by using the Tea Party to take over many state legislatures, like ours, in 2010.   That wasn't just a happy accident -- they targeted 2010, because every ten years, the state legislatures redraw the Congressional districts. Republicans care about local politics more than Democrats do and here is the consequence.   The census determines whether a state gains or loses congressional districts, but the party in power gets to design those districts any way they please.   In 2010, the Republicans executed a national plan called "Redmap" to redraw congressional districts in a way that clumps all the Democrats into just a few districts, and makes the others "safe" for their Republican representatives.   Our 8 th District was one of the least affected, because it was already incredibly challenging for a Democratic candidate -- but none-the-less, we lost the couple of areas of Montgomery and Bucks that had given Patrick Murphy his margin of victory in 2008, in return for some more northern Montgomery County areas that are reliably Republican.   This all but assures this district for a Republican going forward forever, or until the population changes dramatically.

So, what is the result of all this redistricting?   Well, in this last election, 1.1 Million more Democrats than Republicans nationally voted for their party's Congressperson.   But the Republicans still have a 25 seat majority in the House of Representatives.   In PA, 83,000 more Democrats than Republicans voted for their congressional candidate, but Pennsylvania sent 13 Republicans and 5 Democrats to congress.   In Michigan, 240,000 more D's voted than R's, but their congressional delegation is 9 R's/5 D's.   In Ohio, 52% of the voters voted R, so you would think the delegation would be slightly more Republican -- but it is 12 R's, 4/D's.   52% of the vote got the Republicans 75% of the delegation.   Pretty good plan, huh?   Does it have anything at all to do with fairness, with playing by the rules?   Does it even have anything to do with democracy or the will of the people? Hard to see how.

Long Voting Line by edenpictures

And here's the punchline.   Now, the Republicans are preparing for Redmap 2.0.   They want to apply this same principle to Presidential elections, by apportioning electoral college votes by these gerrymandered congressional districts, and Pennsylvania is the testing ground.   If all of the swing states operated this way in this past election, we would have just celebrated President Romney's inauguration.   Despite President Obama winning Pennsylvania by 52.1%, and winning nationwide by 3 Million votes, he would have lost the electoral college 258 to 280. So, think your vote will count?   Think again.

And this new system is closer to becoming law than you think.   Seven Republican state representatives, (Godshall, Grove, Kauffman, A. Harris, Barrar, Emrick and Moul) have introduced House Bill 94.   Our Governor and Republican Senate Leader have already indicated they support the bill.   The Constitution gives state legislatures complete control over how electoral college votes are apportioned.   Checkmate?   Only if you stay silent.   You MUST ACT NOW, or this will be another bill pushed through in the dead of night, and our democracy will be gone.

There is a reasonable argument that our winner-take-all electoral college system is unfair.   And four times in our history (including Bush v. Gore), we have seen the untenable consequence in which one candidate can win the popular vote while the other wins the electoral vote -- and the Presidency.   That feels unfair -- un-democratic -- un-American -- and so it is.   Changing the electoral voting system is actually a good idea -- but only if you change it in a way that will truly represent the will of the people by accurately representing the popular vote.   There is clearly no correlation between the popular vote and apportionment by congressional district.   If there was, Nancy Pelosi would be Speaker of the House now.

The President should be elected by a straight majority of votes nationwide, and there is a movement underway to make that change.   It is a very popular proposal here in PA.   A survey of Pennsylvania voters showed 78% overall support for a national popular vote for President.   That support was bipartisan, with 87% among Democrats, 68% among Republicans, and 76% among independents.   Support was equally strong across all age ranges and genders.   Maybe because it is so common sense.

The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).   One person, one vote would actually have some meaning, and there would no longer be a few battleground states that get all the attention and power.   And it has the added virtue of upholding those universal values of fairness, sportsmanship, and guaranteeing that the peoples' idea of the better candidate wins.

When the bill is enacted by states with a majority of the electoral votes-- enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538), all the electoral votes from the enacting states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and DC.   The bill has passed 31 state legislative chambers in 21 states with 243 electoral votes. The bill has actually been enacted by 9 jurisdictions with 132 electoral votes -- 49% of the 270 necessary to go into effect.   (National Popular Vote, Inc.)  

So, if our legislature wants to tinker with the electoral college, let it tinker this way -- get rid of it, in favor of a national popular vote system, and really level the playing field.   For more information, check out .   There is a page on activities in PA, including information about HB 1270, the National Popular Vote bill introduced in 2012. If PA passed this bill, its 20 electoral votes would put the initiative well over 50%.  

DON'T SIT ON YOUR HANDS ON THIS ONE -- share this information; call your representatives and tell them to vote NO on HB 94 -- our democracy truly is at stake.

Attorney, former local candidate, animal rescue advocate, proud progressive

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Stealing The Election 2.0

What Do Republicans Teach Their Children?

Obama's Chinese Finger Trap--- Setting Us Free By Pushing Us Closer Together

Resistance is Not Futile


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Republicans have no scruples when it comes to acqu... by Howard Schneider on Sunday, Feb 10, 2013 at 8:27:42 AM
CBS News is reporting that Pileggi's spokesperson ... by Mardi Harrison on Sunday, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:23:09 AM